On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 01:05 +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> Am Montag, 5. Juni 2006 18:03 schrieb Stefan Schweizer:
> > today I would like to propose a few default keywords for removal.
> keywords?
>
> > They are outdated and no longer needed on current systems:
> >
> > -fortran - Do we really need
Am Montag, 5. Juni 2006 18:03 schrieb Stefan Schweizer:
> today I would like to propose a few default keywords for removal.
keywords?
> They are outdated and no longer needed on current systems:
>
> -fortran - Do we really need this outdated language as a default in
> gcc?
Remove this and you'll b
Uhm, what is this all about? If you have suggestions, make them, but
don't come out of the gate in a huff talking about unsubstantiated
breakage. That's about the least constructive way to get heard.
The wrapper provided in gcc-config-2.0 provides the exact same
interface to the user as g
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:05:00AM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> The udev/nss_ldap thing has been brewing for a while, and we're still trying
> to
> get upstream udev to fix the issue.
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99564#c44
>
> In that comment I list the proper solution that upstre
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 10:48:51AM +0100, J?rgen Schinker wrote:
> actually my x86 maschine makes at boot when it starts udev
> an ldap request and waits 6 ... 8 ...16 sec
> so at this time ldap is not running
>
> so what wants udev at this early stage ?
>
> my nsswitch.conf
>
> hosts fi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
-xmms - xmms depends on gtk-1 and has been superseeded by audacious/bmpx
At least on SPARC (and possibly other arches, but I'll let them speak for
themselves), there has yet to be an XMMS compatible rep
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 12:13 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> -mikmod - This came from wolf31o2 and I do not like it. mikmod is used in
> many games and I think it gives people less hassle to have it as default.
> The intention of this request is to make use-setting easier, not harder.
> Please do n
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 08:40 +0200, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 21:23:58 -0400,
> Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There are *many* applications in the tree that do not use ALSA, but
> > work only via the OSS emulation. Removing this is a bad idea and
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 00:07 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > There are *many* applications in the tree that do not use ALSA, but work
> > only via the OSS emulation. Removing this is a bad idea and it would
> > definitely be blocked by the games team. Probably half of the packages
> > that I main
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[snip]
Lets keep this friendly. Obviously genstef was mistaken about the oss
use flag. He's not trying to break any of your packages.
- --
===
Mike Doty kingtaco -at- gentoo.or
Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
On Втр, 2006-06-06 at 00:17 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
That's why we use a SCM for managing the ebuilds: the removed ebuilds
are still found via cvs commands and on sources.gentoo.org
But how can I search for removed ebuild in cvs? Is there any quick w
Why are you hijacking tools not written by you, declaring
them as 2.0 and breaking the expected behaviors of them?
Please don't do that ever again.
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 21:24 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> I finally had a few free cycles, so I fixed up the eselect-compiler
> ebuild to bet
Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
> But how can I search for removed ebuild in cvs? Is there any quick way
> for such things?
Use "site:sources.gentoo.org " as query, e.g.
http://www.google.ch/search?q=site%3Asources.gentoo.org+sonar&btnG=Suche&meta=
--
Kind Regards,
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 Develo
On Втр, 2006-06-06 at 00:17 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> That's why we use a SCM for managing the ebuilds: the removed ebuilds
> are still found via cvs commands and on sources.gentoo.org
But how can I search for removed ebuild in cvs? Is there any quick way
for such things?
Peter.
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 12:13, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> If you want to help
> with this effort, we need to create a tracker bug and check [1]
> 71 packages :)
Add to fix and mark stable, _stable_, them before 2006.1 release.
Oh and of course you'll have to take the pieces if something breaks :P
Hi,
so the thread is getting a bit long, I will just summarize the status
-apm -foomaticdb -imlib -motif -xmms
Those are more or less without objections
-fortran - I am dropping this request, seems fortran is meant to be default
-oss - apparently people are fighting this one. Flameeyes also br
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 11:25, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> SDL based games requires mikmod quite often. I suppose Mike knows what he's
> saying.
It's a difference to know that, compared to share ones thoughts, which Mike
missed to do.
Carsten
pgp1iJ8Y6QlGG.pgp
Description: PGP signatur
actually my x86 maschine makes at boot when it starts udev
an ldap request and waits 6 ... 8 ...16 sec
so at this time ldap is not running
so what wants udev at this early stage ?
my nsswitch.conf
hosts files dns ldap
and all users,groups,DNS,DHCP are stored in ldap
--
gentoo-dev
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 08:34, John Myers wrote:
> I use alsa-driver with 2.6 kernels. I forget exactly why (this was almost
> two years ago), but I actually switched _away_ from the in-kernel-tree
> drivers to alsa-driver for some particular reason.
There are a few issues with in-kernel driver whe
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 11:17, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> I'd say 99,9% don't want mikmod. Arguments please, not vague assertions. :)
SDL based games requires mikmod quite often. I suppose Mike knows what he's
saying.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/
Gentoo/Al
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 04:11, Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote:
> Some games fail in pkg_setup if sdl-mixer isn't built
> with mikmod but I'm not sure if we've added the built_with_use check to
> all of the games that need it yet.
Time to fix this. And removing the flag would help, as bugs wou
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 06:07, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> mikmod is the only one i'd keep ... people generally want mikmod whether or
> not they know it ;)
I'd say 99,9% don't want mikmod. Arguments please, not vague assertions. :)
Carsten
pgpMnmHuAbjLA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 04:45, Andrew Muraco wrote:
> Sorry for the offtopic of this, but what would a user set as the
> useflags to have GTK-2 used by default, and GTK-1 for apps that only
> support it? (but not build GTK-2-capable apps with GTK-1)
Just the gtk use flag.
Carsten
pgp2dKgmdERfv
23 matches
Mail list logo
