On Wed, 24 May 2006 18:36:07 -0400
Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you have any corrections, suggestions or improvements please
> contact the editors. Large portions of the handbook were originally
> written by Ciaran McCreesh along with our contributors.
Sorry, but did you have a point her
José Costa wrote:
> The Gentoo Council/Gentoo Infra only needs to release one API for all
> package managers, with all the procedures, how to do stuff standards,
> quality assurance stuff, blabla...
I don't see any reason why the Infrastructure Team should be affiliated
with the decision :).
Bles
| > Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| >> Your treatment of the Authors list that used to be on the main
| >> page is at best highly dubious...
On Wed, 24 May 2006 18:35:25 -0400 Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| This page lists contributors to the Gentoo Development Guide:
Er, yes, that page is the one u
On Wed, 24 May 2006 23:51:06 +0200, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Wed, 24 May 2006 15:48:00 -0400 Mark Loeser
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> | At long last the devmanual is official. You can find it at
>> | http://devmanual.gentoo.org. [...]
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Your tre
On Wed, 24 May 2006 23:51:06 +0200, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Wed, 24 May 2006 15:48:00 -0400 Mark Loeser
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> | At long last the devmanual is official. You can find it at
>> | http://devmanual.gentoo.org. [...]
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Your tre
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2006 15:48:00 -0400 Mark Loeser
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | At long last the devmanual is official. You can find it at
> | http://devmanual.gentoo.org. [...]
>
> [...]
>
> Your treatment of the Authors list that used to be on the main
> page is at best
Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> How was the conversion done? Do we now have a tool to convert rst to
> guidexml, or was the conversion all done by hand (which would be a truly
> frightening thought), or something else entirely?
Be prepared to be frightened then, because it was all done
Mark Loeser wrote:
> At long last the devmanual is official. You can find it at
> http://devmanual.gentoo.org. I would like to thank plasmaroo for helping
> me with converting it to XML (since he did all of the XSL work to add in
> the features we needed to make it easy to write and expand upon).
On Wed, 24 May 2006 15:48:00 -0400 Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| At long last the devmanual is official. You can find it at
| http://devmanual.gentoo.org. I would like to thank plasmaroo for
| helping me with converting it to XML (since he did all of the XSL
| work to add in the featur
Mark Loeser wrote:
> At long last the devmanual is official. You can find it at
> http://devmanual.gentoo.org. I would like to thank plasmaroo for helping
> me with converting it to XML (since he did all of the XSL work to add in
> the features we needed to make it easy to write and expand upon).
Jeffrey Forman wrote:
> To all,
>
> Recently there have been reports of exceedingly long comments being
> posted on bugzilla bugs, such as kernel configs or long error messages.
>
> I had instituted a comment restriction in our test environment that will
> be shortly implemented, but with the rep
At long last the devmanual is official. You can find it at
http://devmanual.gentoo.org. I would like to thank plasmaroo for helping
me with converting it to XML (since he did all of the XSL work to add in
the features we needed to make it easy to write and expand upon).
If anyone finds any error
Hello,
That's right.
I've added need-cmake function which add >=dev-util/cmake-VERSION depend.
need-cmake() {
debug-print-function $FUNCNAME $*
CMAKEVER="$1"
# from need-kde
if [ "${RDEPEND-unset}" != "unset" ] ; then
x_DEPEND="${RDEPEND}"
else
x_DEPEND="${DEP
On Wed, 24 May 2006 13:42:37 +0200
Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please, make portage spit out the errors in English by *default* to
> not waste people's time. If someone insists on overriding it, then
> let them do it in make.conf, but the default should be English and
> English should b
On Wed, 24 May 2006 13:17:54 +0200
Harald van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> LINGUAS is not Gentoo-specific at all. Gentoo didn't even come up with
> it. It's a gettext variable, which is re-used (with an annoyingly
> slightly different meaning) by Gentoo.
Thanks for the clarification - I only
Rumi Szabolcs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to set up dynamic routing on a Gentoo box. What I found is that
> the netkit-routed from ebuild (w/gcc 3.3.6) is segfaulting and gated is
> not in portage at all. Any comments?
>
> Thanks,
> Sab
USE quagga
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
To all,
Recently there have been reports of exceedingly long comments being
posted on bugzilla bugs, such as kernel configs or long error messages.
I had instituted a comment restriction in our test environment that will
be shortly implemented, but with the reports as of late, have made this
chan
Can I suggest including a function for setting a minumum cmake
version, similar to the need-kde function in kde-functions.eclass.
For some apps, cmake 2.2 is a requirement, and giving the option to
require =dev-util/cmake-2.2* will prevent breakage on architectures
for which 2.2 is still ~. With
Hi,
I wanted to set up dynamic routing on a Gentoo box. What I found is that
the netkit-routed from ebuild (w/gcc 3.3.6) is segfaulting and gated is
not in portage at all. Any comments?
Thanks,
Sab
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 00:11 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> My opinion is "snap, crackle, and pop"... let the tree break. But better
> yet... figure out what depends on package X <=1.0 and p.mask it.
Umm... anything that depends on the package in question *should* be
getting masked. There's no opi
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 22:09 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 May 2006 21:18, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Thursday 18 May 2006 06:41, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > >> The package sys-apps/paludis is in the wrong category. It is a package
> > >> manager on par wi
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 15:36 -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 06:24:31PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 15:05 -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 05:46:09PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > > I completely understand this. Howe
Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> On Fri, 19 May 2006 11:38:06 +0200
> Stefan Schweizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> there are at least two problems with how portage currently handles
>> locales:
>>
>> - Firstly some packages fail to build with obscure LC_* settings
>
> Anything that expects o
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 12:36:17PM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> On Fri, 19 May 2006 11:38:06 +0200
> Stefan Schweizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One problem could be that packages depend on LC_* to install the
> > correct language. But that is a real bug then in my opinion, because
> > ebuild
Hi,
Thanks for your comments.
Here is my updated cmake.eclass :
http://backzone.net/~panard/patches/gentoo-overlay/eclass/cmake.eclass
Beers,
Panard
Le Mercredi 24 Mai 2006 02:52, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
> On Thursday 18 May 2006 07:44, Panard wrote:
> > OPTION=${OPTION:-"WITH_${USEF
On Fri, 19 May 2006 11:38:06 +0200
Stefan Schweizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there are at least two problems with how portage currently handles
> locales:
>
> - Firstly some packages fail to build with obscure LC_* settings
Anything that expects ordering etc from a particular locale
26 matches
Mail list logo
