Re: [gentoo-dev] automatically killing invalid CFLAGS/warning about bad CFLAGS

2006-04-13 Thread Harald van D??k
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 10:49:24PM -0400, Patrick McLean wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Alec Warner wrote: > > > > Except you need a way for them to turn it off, and you do not currently > > provide one. We can set default flags all we want, but I don't see > > filt

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: automatically killing invalid CFLAGS/warning about bad CFLAGS

2006-04-13 Thread Harald van D??k
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 09:39:28PM -0600, R Hill wrote: > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > >R Hill wrote: > >>There's an endless number of CFLAGS that could be warned about, and just > >>as many situations where they're actually useful. Aside, I've yet to > >>hear of _anything_ that's broken because of -f

[gentoo-dev] Re: automatically killing invalid CFLAGS/warning about bad CFLAGS

2006-04-13 Thread R Hill
Donnie Berkholz wrote: R Hill wrote: There's an endless number of CFLAGS that could be warned about, and just as many situations where they're actually useful. Aside, I've yet to hear of _anything_ that's broken because of -fvisibility-inlines-hidden. (course someone will undoubtedly point one

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: automatically killing invalid CFLAGS/warning about bad CFLAGS

2006-04-13 Thread Donnie Berkholz
R Hill wrote: > There's an endless number of CFLAGS that could be warned about, and just > as many situations where they're actually useful. Aside, I've yet to > hear of _anything_ that's broken because of -fvisibility-inlines-hidden. > (course someone will undoubtedly point one out now ;)) How a

[gentoo-dev] Re: automatically killing invalid CFLAGS/warning about bad CFLAGS

2006-04-13 Thread R Hill
Patrick McLean wrote: For about a month now, we (amd64) have had some code in our profile.bashrc that filters CFLAGS that are unrecognized by gcc, and warnings the user about bad CFLAGS. The broken flags part is useful. So far it has worked fairly well, and it has really cut down on the numbe

Re: [gentoo-dev] automatically killing invalid CFLAGS/warning about bad CFLAGS

2006-04-13 Thread Patrick McLean
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alec Warner wrote: > > Except you need a way for them to turn it off, and you do not currently > provide one. We can set default flags all we want, but I don't see > filtering 'bad' flags as necessarily our problem. If you want to say: > > "Hey we

Re: [gentoo-dev] automatically killing invalid CFLAGS/warning about bad CFLAGS

2006-04-13 Thread Alec Warner
Patrick McLean wrote: > For about a month now, we (amd64) have had some code in our > profile.bashrc that filters CFLAGS that are unrecognized by gcc, and > warnings the user about bad CFLAGS. > > So far it has worked fairly well, and it has really cut down on the > number of bugs that filed by pe

[gentoo-dev] Re: automatically killing invalid CFLAGS/warning about bad CFLAGS

2006-04-13 Thread Duncan
Patrick McLean posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:50:11 -0400: > For about a month now, we (amd64) have had some code in our > profile.bashrc that filters CFLAGS that are unrecognized by gcc, and > warnings the user about bad CFLAGS. > > So far it has worked fair

[gentoo-dev] last rites for app-mobilephone/openobex-apps

2006-04-13 Thread Alin Nastac
Unless someone has a really good reason not to, app-mobilephone/openobex-apps will be removed from the tree on April 20th. Most programs found in this package were included in >=dev-libs/openobex-1.2. The only exception, obexserver, have a better replacement in app-mobilephone/sobexsrv. signatur

[gentoo-dev] automatically killing invalid CFLAGS/warning about bad CFLAGS

2006-04-13 Thread Patrick McLean
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 For about a month now, we (amd64) have had some code in our profile.bashrc that filters CFLAGS that are unrecognized by gcc, and warnings the user about bad CFLAGS. So far it has worked fairly well, and it has really cut down on the number of bugs tha

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-mail/mailman needs a new maintainer

2006-04-13 Thread Hanno Böck
Am Donnerstag, 13. April 2006 07:07 schrieb Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen: > net-mail/mailman is without an ebuild maintainer and has an open security > bug #129136 > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129136 > > Anyone willing to take care of this package in the future, please update > metadata