net-mail/mailman is without an ebuild maintainer and has an open security bug
#129136
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129136
Anyone willing to take care of this package in the future, please update
metadata.xml and CC yourself on the bug.
--
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
Gentoo Linux Secu
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 09:48 -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> > didn't he ask for people who know a particular application very well?
>
> If you actually read the GLEP, you will note that there is a provision
> to expand the idea to include herd testers.
someone might like to help with testing o
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 12:55, foser wrote:
> Adding workarounds like preserve_old_lib* should only be a temporary
> measure.
right ... i dont even like mentioning their existence, but i shudder to think
what ebuild writers would code in the place of using these functions ...
-mike
--
gentoo-
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 17:27 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> While this also does not stand any chance to win a beauty contest, this
> would also be acceptable to me. The only thing I want is things not
> starting to fail without a good reason. A new version of a library is on
> itself not a good
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 15:54, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > While I agree that SLOT's are not perfect, they were created to solve
> > this problem too. If another working solution is found, that is ok
> > for me too. But I don't want to just find my binary stops working
> > because some of its libr
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 09:56, Duncan wrote:
> Maybe make him the documentation and help section icon? Or the icon for
> contact information (Gentoo developer listing, etc)? Something.
by explaining his presence, we hurt him
just leave him be !
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Curtis Napier posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on
Tue, 11 Apr 2006 18:50:42 -0400:
> Jan Kundrát wrote:
>>
>> 17:33 <@jkt|> drobbins: actually, it has been mentioned in the recent
>> thread on -dev ML that you own the copyright or something of the flying
>> saucer on w.g.o
>> [...]
>
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 03:38, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 April 2006 19:13, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 April 2006 10:52, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > > Please remember, this is the reason we have SLOTS
> >
> > no it isnt
> >
> > you're complaining about lack of a portage fea
didn't he ask for people who know a particular application very well?
If you actually read the GLEP, you will note that there is a provision
to expand the idea to include herd testers.
i think there is a big difference between agreeing to test one
particular package since they know it very w
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 19:13, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 April 2006 10:52, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > Please remember, this is the reason we have SLOTS
>
> no it isnt
>
> you're complaining about lack of a portage feature to track ABI's and
> urging the use of hacks in ebuilds to work a
10 matches
Mail list logo
