that's all i got, i'm sure the other guys that were there can chime
in with
their experiences (i almost got rajiv to ride piggy back ... maybe
next year)
key word is _almost_ ...
several (but unfortunately not all) of the devs verified gpg key
fingerprints. those of you who did should now
wwwredesign.gentoo.org already has been converted and is going live on
www.gentoo.org shortly (we just have a few last minute things to do).
can we add a robots.txt on wwwredesign.gentoo.org that disallows /
from * ? if the site is just for testing a new layout or code, we do
not want (any m
On Saturday 01 April 2006 04:22, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the
> 2nd Thursday once a month), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
> irc.freenode.net) !
due to LWE we're pushing it back to the 21st
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org maili
Vapier wrote: [Fri Apr 07 2006, 07:00:22PM EDT]
> On Tuesday 04 April 2006 13:54, Aron Griffis wrote:
> > Vapier wrote: [Tue Apr 04 2006, 01:12:28AM EDT]
> > > the idea is that it's common sense and to need to vote on something
> > > like this seems asinine
> >
> > It might seem that way, but som
On Monday 10 April 2006 20:38, Curtis Napier wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 10 April 2006 18:38, Curtis Napier wrote:
> >> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> On Monday 10 April 2006 15:37, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When
> >>>
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 10 April 2006 14:08, Curtis Napier wrote:
>> I honestly think we can make it happen if we all pitch in.
>
> a simple news item on the front page + GWN request could prob gather a lot of
> attention
>
>> other WM's/desktops can also be done if someone is willing
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 10 April 2006 18:38, Curtis Napier wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Monday 10 April 2006 15:37, Grant Goodyear wrote:
In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When
drobbins left and turned over the Gentoo IP to us, one thing t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olivier Crete wrote:
>>i'll miss him :(
>
>
> Yea we have to keep him, he is one of the most important members of our
> community.
Agreed! I like the lil' alien. (In some obscure way, he reminds me of Earthbound
. . .)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
On Mon, 2006-10-04 at 18:25 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 10 April 2006 15:37, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> > In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When
> > drobbins left and turned over the Gentoo IP to us, one thing that he
> > kept was the flying saucer guy. I be
On Monday 10 April 2006 18:38, Curtis Napier wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 10 April 2006 15:37, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> >> In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When
> >> drobbins left and turned over the Gentoo IP to us, one thing that he
> >> kept was the
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 10 April 2006 15:37, Grant Goodyear wrote:
>> In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When
>> drobbins left and turned over the Gentoo IP to us, one thing that he
>> kept was the flying saucer guy. I believe that he was allowing us to
>> us
On Monday 10 April 2006 14:08, Curtis Napier wrote:
> I honestly think we can make it happen if we all pitch in.
a simple news item on the front page + GWN request could prob gather a lot of
attention
> other WM's/desktops can also be done if someone is willing to do it.
> Like E17 or XFCE, etc.
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:21:14 -0400
Curtis Napier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Instead, I'm now the "Web Coordinator". I proposed this new role to
> the Infra Leads and met no resistance or objections so I have taken
> the initiative and created the role. Also, neysx and I together were
> approache
Vapier wrote: [Mon Apr 10 2006, 05:25:23PM CDT]
> On Monday 10 April 2006 15:37, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> > In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When
> > drobbins left and turned over the Gentoo IP to us, one thing that he
> > kept was the flying saucer guy. I believe tha
On Monday 10 April 2006 15:37, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When
> drobbins left and turned over the Gentoo IP to us, one thing that he
> kept was the flying saucer guy. I believe that he was allowing us to
> use it while we got the redesi
Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Curtis Napier wrote: [Mon Apr 10 2006, 11:21:14AM CDT]
>> The redesign as it was known up until this point is no more. There were
>> things the winner of the contest had to do and he failed to do them
>> (after almost 2 years of trying to get him too). I discussed it with
>>
Curtis Napier wrote: [Mon Apr 10 2006, 11:21:14AM CDT]
> The redesign as it was known up until this point is no more. There were
> things the winner of the contest had to do and he failed to do them
> (after almost 2 years of trying to get him too). I discussed it with
> klieber a little and after
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 14:08 -0400, Curtis Napier wrote:
> Wolf31o2, what about you and the other CD maintainers, are you guys
> willing to use this if we can get it done?
CD creation has nothing to do with it, really. We simply make stuff
based on the defaults. If there were a "branding" USE fla
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Curtis Napier wrote:
>>> Spyderous already has a new logo started that we can build on. We can
>>> easily take it and build an entire theme around it. We also have the
>>> lila theme and the Gentoo Icon Set we can use as raw material. Both of
>>> them could easily be rework
On Monday 10 April 2006 16:53, Curtis Napier wrote:
> We also have the
> lila theme and the Gentoo Icon Set we can use as raw material. Both of
> them could easily be reworked into something we can use if we need to.
I suggest you to not consider the gentoo icon set. As it is is a _really_ bad
cop
Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Curtis Napier wrote: [Mon Apr 10 2006, 09:53:04AM CDT]
>> I'm willing to theme *.gentoo.org to match [...].
>
> Speaking of which, what is the current status of the web redesign?
>
> Thanks,
> g2boojum
Well, I was planning on announcing this later on but I guess now is as
Curtis Napier wrote:
> I think we should have a unified Gentoo Theme that cuts across all
> projects. I'm willing to theme *.gentoo.org to match and I'm also
> willing to help out with theming other things or actually creating the
> artwork if we really need help on that front (I'm not an artist bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Curtis Napier wrote:
> Spyderous already has a new logo started that we can build on. We can
> easily take it and build an entire theme around it. We also have the
> lila theme and the Gentoo Icon Set we can use as raw material. Both of
> them could ea
Curtis Napier wrote: [Mon Apr 10 2006, 09:53:04AM CDT]
> I'm willing to theme *.gentoo.org to match [...].
Speaking of which, what is the current status of the web redesign?
Thanks,
g2boojum
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 19:15 +, Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote:
>> Carsten Lohrke gentoo.org> writes:
>>
>>> How do you want not to enforce it?
>> Have you actually read the proposal? It's quite sensible and is entitled:
>>
>> "Proposal: Integrated boot themes on LiveCDs a
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 08:44:49 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 10 April 2006 04:19, Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > > On Monday 10 April 2006 05:26, Daniel Ahlberg wrote:
> > >> * if ebuild has $PN in SRC_URI (cosmet
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 19:15 +, Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote:
> Carsten Lohrke gentoo.org> writes:
>
> > How do you want not to enforce it?
> Have you actually read the proposal? It's quite sensible and is entitled:
>
> "Proposal: Integrated boot themes on LiveCDs and installations"
>
> I supp
On Monday 10 April 2006 04:19, Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > On Monday 10 April 2006 05:26, Daniel Ahlberg wrote:
> >> * if ebuild has $PN in SRC_URI (cosmetic).
> >
> > Why is this one bad? It creates some flexibility, and has the name of the
On Monday 10 April 2006 08:09, Caleb Tennis wrote:
> I've been working on an ebuild that, ideally, would use the subversion
> eclass to checkout a snapshot of the ebuild (this is for local program).
> I plan to just put the repository version in the ebuild PV - ie:
> myprogram-224.ebuild.
doesnt t
I've been working on an ebuild that, ideally, would use the subversion
eclass to checkout a snapshot of the ebuild (this is for local program).
I plan to just put the repository version in the ebuild PV - ie:
myprogram-224.ebuild.
The problem is that portage always want to re-emerge this package
Because you can't cut-n-paste the url when editing the ebuild.
Michael Sterrett
-Mr. Bones.-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Monday 10 April 2006 05:26, Daniel Ahlberg wrote:
* if ebuild has $PN in SRC_URI (cosmetic).
Why is this one bad? It creates some fl
On Monday 10 April 2006 05:26, Daniel Ahlberg wrote:
> * if ebuild has $PN in SRC_URI (cosmetic).
Why is this one bad? It creates some flexibility, and has the name of the
package in one place only.
Paul
--
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.n
32 matches
Mail list logo
