[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14731 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

[gentoo-dev] Re: [Last Rites] NVU

Jory A. Pratt gentoo.org> writes: > As most are aware nvu has not had any activity in almost a year. Unless > someone steps up or has any valid reason we should continue to patch nvu > to keep it in the tree please speak up. One is that nvu is the only reasonably full featured free WYSIWYG

[gentoo-dev] Reminder: Security Project meeting tomorrow, March 20th, 2000 UTC

Small reminder, The Security project will hold an online meeting via IRC, on Freenode's #gentoo-security channel, tomorrow, March 20th, at 2000 UTC. The agenda will be the following : 1/ Project status - GLSA team status - Kernel team status - Audit team status 2/ Improvements areas

[gentoo-dev] New Developer: Karol Pasternak (reb)

Ladies and Gentoo-men, [This announcement comes a bit late, sorry :-)] It is my honour to proudly present you Karol Pasternak, also known as reb. Karol lives in Koszalin, Poland and turned 20 some days ago (I hope you had a happy birthday). Besides his interest in computer, he likes climbing and

Re: [gentoo-dev] firefox-1.5.x still in ~arch

On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 15:24 +0100, Matthias Langer wrote: > I'm just curious: What is the reason that firefox-1.5.x is still in > ~arch ? Looking at bugreports it seems that firefox 1.5 has - at least on some systems - quite serious issues. Some users report excessive memory usage, I've masked it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: firefox-1.5.x still in ~arch

On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 07:56 -0700, Duncan wrote: > Matthias Langer posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > excerpted below, on Sun, 19 Mar 2006 15:24:19 +0100: > > > I'm just curious: What is the reason that firefox-1.5.x is still in > > ~arch ? > > General policy is that an ebuild should be bug-free in ~

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Last Rites] NVU

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 19.03.2006 um 04:46 schrieb Stephen Bennett: If noone has any complaints I will p.mask Wed. March 21 and remove 30 days later. Do you mean Wednesday, or March 21st? Or were you planning on masking it next year? I think he means Tuesday, March

[gentoo-dev] Re: firefox-1.5.x still in ~arch

Matthias Langer posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Sun, 19 Mar 2006 15:24:19 +0100: > I'm just curious: What is the reason that firefox-1.5.x is still in > ~arch ? General policy is that an ebuild should be bug-free in ~arch for 30 days before it is stabilized. Individual herds and

[gentoo-dev] firefox-1.5.x still in ~arch

I'm just curious: What is the reason that firefox-1.5.x is still in ~arch ? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Savannah CVS changes and the missing GNUStep herd

On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 11:05:15PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Are they all in package.mask? No, not all of them - but Halcy0n has agreed to take a look at it. Regards, Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd pgpjpq5MVfmAS.pgp Descri

Re: [gentoo-dev] Savannah CVS changes and the missing GNUStep herd

Unless somebody else wants to do it, I am about to step in here to keep GNUstep in the tree. I already did some research on it, and it seems it needs an update, and the previous maintainer masked a few of the CVS ebuilds, so that eases things a bit. Seems many of the packages can use an upgrade,