On Thursday 09 March 2006 09:24, Mikey wrote:
> That is my point. There is nothing there to strip
file a bug
> yet during an install I
> noticed it running scanelf on the entire 248 meg source tree. Kind of a
> pointless task, not to mention extremely wasteful of resources.
yes and no
scanel
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> NOTE: Please post all replies on gentoo-desktop rather than gentoo-dev.
>
>
> It's about that time again, folks. We're going to have desktop project
> lead elections within the next month or so.
>
> Who's interested in running for lead? Feel free to post a bit on why
> y
On Thursday 09 March 2006 20:37, Grobian wrote:
> As far as I know: no. I didn't myself because I'm having a problem with
> ppc-macos and the upcoming x86-macos (they will probably have a lot in
> common) and am not completely sure whether what Diego and I proposed is
> actually flexible enough.
I
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:58:03 +0100
Patrick Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> During that discussion we realized that having utf-8 not enabled by
> default and no utf8 fonts available by default causes lots of
> recompilation and reconfiguration.
>
> Enabling the unicode useflag in the profiles
On 09-03-2006 12:30:33 -0500, Alec Warner wrote:
> Regardless, I'd like to reach a conclusion about this, was GLEP 47
> submitted to the council for the next meeting?
As far as I know: no. I didn't myself because I'm having a problem with
ppc-macos and the upcoming x86-macos (they will probably h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yup. Chalk up one more for the SoCal conspiracy. ^_^
Peter Gordon wrote:
> Another Southern Californian, it would seem. Excellent. If you're ever
> in the Anaheim/Orange County Area give me a jingle. We could go for some
> Starbucks and head to Fry's
Stephen Bennett wrote:
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 10:20:33 -0500
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Basically portage expands $ARCH into use ( so
x86-fbsd has ARCH x86, and would get "x86" in use, which IMHO, isn't
that horrible ). However, you also don't get x86-fbsd shoved into
USE, so you ha
Francesco Riosa wrote:
> Luca (chtekk) Longinotti, will also take care of MySQL, on my request,
> in a near future, then I'll stay as a backup maintainer for the time
> coming, or leave if needed for whatever reason.
Don't be so hard on yourself. Everyone thinks you did a great job with
MySQL. Onl
On Thursday 09 March 2006 16:20, Alec Warner wrote:
> Basically portage expands $ARCH into use ( so x86-fbsd has
> ARCH x86, and would get "x86" in use, which IMHO, isn't that horrible ).
Right now ARCH=x86-fbsd for G/FBSD, as spb already said, so it's not much of
the problem.
If that will change
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 15:29:23 +0100
"Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To bring ~x86-fbsd keywording in main tree, we mainly need to move a
> true profile in the tree, not a dummy one, mark it as indev and start
> the keywording. (I've already cleaned up the default-bsd/fbsd pr
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 10:20:33 -0500
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically portage expands $ARCH into use ( so
> x86-fbsd has ARCH x86, and would get "x86" in use, which IMHO, isn't
> that horrible ). However, you also don't get x86-fbsd shoved into
> USE, so you have to inject it elsew
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> Okay, solar asked me yesterday, and I think this might be the good moment to
> start this out.
> Right now the x86-fbsd keyword is not being used in the main tree, and the
> whole Gentoo/FreeBSD is handled in an overlay, sharing the ~x86 keyword with
> standard
On Thursday 09 March 2006 05:28, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Thursday 09 March 2006 04:12, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > this is kind of a pita in terms of maintenance and imo a hack ... why not
> > just have the splitelf code skip stripped binaries
>
> Because of the number of `file` calls n
Luca Longinotti wrote:
> As the title says, what would you prefer for the future of MySQL in Gentoo?
> Please take a moment to read
> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-438557.html and vote (and
> eventually comment on it).
> Thanks!
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125599
deprecation o
Okay, solar asked me yesterday, and I think this might be the good moment to
start this out.
Right now the x86-fbsd keyword is not being used in the main tree, and the
whole Gentoo/FreeBSD is handled in an overlay, sharing the ~x86 keyword with
standard Gentoo/Linux.
Unfortunately this has a ser
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 11:28 +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Thursday 09 March 2006 04:12, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > this is kind of a pita in terms of maintenance and imo a hack ... why not
> > just have the splitelf code skip stripped binaries
> Because of the number of `file` calls n
Peter, the least you could do is take your boyfriend somewhere nice... ;)On 09/03/06, Peter Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:Another Southern Californian, it would seem. Excellent. If you're ever
in the Anaheim/Orange County Area give me a jingle. We could go for someStarbucks and head to Fry's or
On Thursday 09 March 2006 04:12, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> this is kind of a pita in terms of maintenance and imo a hack ... why not
> just have the splitelf code skip stripped binaries
Because of the number of `file` calls needed to identify stripped and
non-stripped binaries, I'd say...
--
Diego
18 matches
Mail list logo
