Peter Cech wrote:
What leads you to believe the license texts distributed in portage tree
are legaly binding with respect to the packages? Each packgage carries
(or at least should carry) its license embeded inside. In my
understanding, licanse pointers in ebuilds are purely informative and
all
On Monday 23 January 2006 10:06, Francesco Riosa wrote:
> Here there is a guide on howto switch to the slotted versions of MySQL.
> It's a first draft and to be totally usable some repoman commit are needed.
You're probably better of putting this in bugzilla and assigning to the docs
team. Please
Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:45:34 -0500
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Saturday 21 January 2006 23:12, Marius Mauch wrote:
>>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 15 January 2006 01:11, Mike Frysinger wrote:
- we add an emerge flag (say '--debug-bui
Here there is a guide on howto switch to the slotted versions of MySQL.
It's a first draft and to be totally usable some repoman commit are needed.
After the mentioned commits and the needed corrections to the guide
4.1.16 , 5.0.17 and 5.0.18 (all marked unstable) will be removed.
At the same tim
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 02:59:39PM -0700, Joshua Baergen wrote:
> Joshua Baergen wrote:
> >The reasons that this system was chosen were correctness and
> >maintainability. Many of these essentially use the good old MIT
> >license with various companies' and/or individuals' copyrights at the
> >
Joshua Baergen wrote:
The reasons that this system was chosen were correctness and
maintainability. Many of these essentially use the good old MIT
license with various companies' and/or individuals' copyrights at the
top, as you have stated. However, the MIT license does refer to the
copyrig
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 08:32:20AM +0100, sanchan wrote:
>> And it is easier to add in rsync_exclude if you don't want it...
>> But it seems that there is no much consensus for the new category.
>> Tomorrow I've planned the final tests on tos-1.1.15 and nesc-1.2.1 that
On Sunday 22 January 2006 16:30, Marius Mauch wrote:
> I meant the option is redundant if it just triggers a feature setting,
> as it's the same as `FEATURES=debug-build emerge foo`
as noted in earlier proposal:
> - no easy way for users/developers to quickly emerge a package and have it
> contain
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:54:49 +0100
Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So unless there are any objections to this I'll make the change this
> weekend.
Done.
--
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
Light.' And
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:45:34 -0500
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 21 January 2006 23:12, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Sunday 15 January 2006 01:11, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > >
> > > - we add an emerge flag (say '--debug-build') which adds
> > > "d
On 1/22/06, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i have no scripts
> -mike
Sorry, I was tripping. The scripts are spyderous's.
Marcelo
--
Marcelo Góes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Saturday 21 January 2006 23:12, Marius Mauch wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 January 2006 01:11, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >
> > - we add an emerge flag (say '--debug-build') which adds "debug-build" to
> > FEATURES
>
> IMO this is pointless and redundant.
its purpose is to handle
On Sunday 22 January 2006 12:31, Marcelo Góes wrote:
> On 1/22/06, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sunday 22 January 2006 09:48, Marcelo Góes wrote:
> > > media-libs/xpm is currently just a dummy ebuild that depends on
> > > virtual/x11. All ebuilds in the tree have already been ad
On 1/22/06, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 22 January 2006 09:48, Marcelo Góes wrote:
> > media-libs/xpm is currently just a dummy ebuild that depends on
> > virtual/x11. All ebuilds in the tree have already been adapted to
> > depend directly on virtual/x11 and/or modular X
On Sunday 22 January 2006 09:48, Marcelo Góes wrote:
> media-libs/xpm is currently just a dummy ebuild that depends on
> virtual/x11. All ebuilds in the tree have already been adapted to
> depend directly on virtual/x11 and/or modular X equivalents. Thus I'm
> scheduling it for removal within a wee
Hi,
x11-libs/docklib is old, unmaintained and not used. All dockaps that use
such library use x11-libs/libdockap already (last was ported today).
There's no ebuild that depends on docklib. I've scheduled it for removal
on Friday 27/01 if nobody complains (currently p.masked).
--
Krzysiek 'Nelcha
Hello,
media-libs/xpm is currently just a dummy ebuild that depends on
virtual/x11. All ebuilds in the tree have already been adapted to
depend directly on virtual/x11 and/or modular X equivalents. Thus I'm
scheduling it for removal within a week or so if nobody complains.
Cheers,
Marcelo
--
Mar
Hi,
I'm planning on removing app-office/openoffice-ximian from the tree in a
week or so. The package has been superseded by
app-office/openoffice-2.0, which has every bonus stuff openoffice-ximian
ever had. All archs have now moved over to app-office/openoffice-2.0, so
this is the right time to sa
18 matches
Mail list logo
