Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC-3.4 will be marked stable in ~1 hour on x86

2005-12-04 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 02/12/2005-16:55:23(-0500): Mark Loeser types > > [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/x86/gcc-upgrading-guide.xml Re: the guide above. It says to run # revdep-rebuild --library libstdc++.so.5 -- -pv # revdep-rebuild --library libstdc++.so.5 However, revdep-rebuild only recognizes

Re: [gentoo-dev] eclass mozconfig-2 restrictions

2005-12-04 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Sunday 04 December 2005 20:47, Ned Ludd wrote: > that sounds like it would solve the problems ferringb has > pointed out in the past. That works fine, a part an "Eclass blabla inherited illegally" errors on unmerge of older ebuilds. The main problem is that what was proposed for shadow deps req

Re: [gentoo-dev] eclass mozconfig-2 restrictions

2005-12-04 Thread Ned Ludd
On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 20:14 +0100, Luca Barbato wrote: > Ned Ludd wrote: > > > > You should talk to ferringb about why it's evil to remove functions from > > an eclass ever. > > > > eclasses can't inherit from other eclasses? > > Just splitting functionality on another eclass and keep the forme

Re: [gentoo-dev] eclass mozconfig-2 restrictions

2005-12-04 Thread Luca Barbato
Ned Ludd wrote: You should talk to ferringb about why it's evil to remove functions from an eclass ever. eclasses can't inherit from other eclasses? Just splitting functionality on another eclass and keep the former eclass providing everything by inheriting the new one doesn't work? lu -

[gentoo-dev] Re: gcc-3.4 migration guide

2005-12-04 Thread Jeff Grossman
Jan Kundr?t <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, charset: utf-8, 14 lines --] > > On Saturday 03 of December 2005 21:26 Matthias Langer wrote: >> 1.) If you remove gcc-3.3* before emerge -e system you will be left >> behind with a broken python and therefore emer

Re: [gentoo-dev] eclass mozconfig-2 restrictions

2005-12-04 Thread Ned Ludd
On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 08:26 -0600, Jory A. Pratt wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > I have found a restrictions in out mozconfig-2 eclass. Splitting the > eclass core configuration out to a seprate eclass will fix the > restrictions. I have placed the eclasses at >

[gentoo-dev] eclass mozconfig-2 restrictions

2005-12-04 Thread Jory A. Pratt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have found a restrictions in out mozconfig-2 eclass. Splitting the eclass core configuration out to a seprate eclass will fix the restrictions. I have placed the eclasses at http://dev.gentoo.org/~anarchy/eclass for view. With the new mozcore

[gentoo-dev] Re: emerge -e question Was: GCC-3.4 will be marked stable in ~1 hour on x86

2005-12-04 Thread Duncan
Jason Stubbs posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:13:54 +0900: >> Reading this reminds me of a question I've had since I tried emerge -eav >> world last time: >> >> When portage merges, it stops the emerge process, updates its metadata or >> whatever, then restarts