-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
Just thought I'd remind everyone that with the coming of a new month
comes a bugday on Saturday the 3rd. As usual you can check out our
todo list, if you will, on http://bugday.gentoo.org . The homebase
for all bugday activities is #gentoo
maillog: 02/12/2005-03:57:20(+): Stephen Bennett types
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:45:00 +0900
> Georgi Georgiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I don't need a fully populated /dev to get a working shell with
> > init=/bin/bash on the kernel cmdline. And at that point it is easy to
> > run /dev/M
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 14:49 -0600, lnxg33k wrote:
> USE=doc emerge catalyst
>
> That gives the definitive spec file templates which are well documented.
> The online documentation is still for catalyst 1.x, which will be phased
> out over the next couple weeks for cataly
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:45:00PM +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> maillog: 02/12/2005-02:47:55(+): Stephen Bennett types
> > On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:35:23 +0100
> > Matthias Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > revealed that there are in fact hundrets of premade device nodes in
> > > th
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:45:00 +0900
Georgi Georgiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't need a fully populated /dev to get a working shell with
> init=/bin/bash on the kernel cmdline. And at that point it is easy to
> run /dev/MAKEDEV and get whatever devices are needed for
> troubleshooting.
Stil
maillog: 02/12/2005-02:47:55(+): Stephen Bennett types
> On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:35:23 +0100
> Matthias Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > revealed that there are in fact hundrets of premade device nodes in
> > the /dev directory. And this is not only true for the box where i
> > discovere
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:35:23 +0100
Matthias Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> revealed that there are in fact hundrets of premade device nodes in
> the /dev directory. And this is not only true for the box where i
> discovered this, which was brought up from a 2004.x cd, but also true
> for the
I'm just a more or less simple user of gentoo who somtimes tries to look
a bit behind the curtain, so if you think this posting doesn't belong to
gentoo-dev let me know.
However, maybe this is interesting to you:
Recently i've got serious trouble with one of my hard drives, so that i
was forced t
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 03:03 +0100, Matthias Langer wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 01:30 +0100, Marien Zwart wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:50:02 -0500
> > Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > > > 1.12.2005, 0:29:48, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> >
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 01:30 +0100, Marien Zwart wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:50:02 -0500
> Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > > 1.12.2005, 0:29:48, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > revdep-rebuild --library=libstdc++.so.5 is all that's needed here t
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 18:37 +0100, Andreas Proschofsky wrote:
> It's not that easy for every package. For instance openoffice and
> openoffice-bin need to got to the same location, cause OOo does a user
> install and this will break when changing between them (and all the
> settings / paths and so
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 23:17 -0600, R Hill wrote:
> All arches other than x86 have made the switch to 3.4 stable already. They
> did
> so without problem and without extra docs. Why does x86, the last to switch,
> need to be special-cased?
From what I understand, most other archs have done the s
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 23:17 -0600, R Hill wrote:
> > That makes me feel a bit more comfortable. I still think that something
> > more then an einfo warning should be provided, as its easy to overlook
> > those.
>
> All arches other than x86 have made the switch to 3.4 stable already. They
> did
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 23:17:31 -0600
R Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All arches other than x86 have made the switch to 3.4 stable
> already. They did so without problem and without extra docs. Why
> does x86, the last to switch, need to be special-cased?
Actually, SPARC isn't even onto gcc-3.
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 17:34 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
>
>
> Technically, you don't need to rebuild world. You only need to rebuild
> stuff that uses C++ and links to libstdc++.
>
>
How about giving the following as an alternative:
revdep-rebuild --library=libstdc++.s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lina Pezzella wrote:
| I would want to know exactly how many keywords would be dropped with
| this solution. I would hate to see something that is working perfectly
| fine having support dropped due to syntax troubles in an ebuild...
Portage's lack
16 matches
Mail list logo
