Re: [gentoo-dev] Why arch-specific make.conf files?

2005-11-15 Thread Marius Mauch
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 14:52:28 -0500 Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 20:19 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Was just about to finally commit the elog related config stuff into > > make.conf just to notice (again) that there are 14 (in words: > > fourtee

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why arch-specific make.conf files?

2005-11-15 Thread Marius Mauch
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 14:54:01 -0500 Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 20:26 +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > > On Tuesday 15 November 2005 20:19, Marius Mauch wrote: > > > From my POV those vars should be set in the profiles instead, and > > > a quick scan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why arch-specific make.conf files?

2005-11-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 04:01:07PM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 20:01 +, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 02:52:28PM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > > On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 20:19 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: > > > > Was just about to finally commit th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why arch-specific make.conf files?

2005-11-15 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 20:01 +, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 02:52:28PM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 20:19 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: > > > Was just about to finally commit the elog related config stuff into > > > make.conf just to notice (again) th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why arch-specific make.conf files?

2005-11-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 02:52:28PM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 20:19 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: > > Was just about to finally commit the elog related config stuff into > > make.conf just to notice (again) that there are 14 (in words: fourteen) > > different make.conf file

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why arch-specific make.conf files?

2005-11-15 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 20:19 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: > From my POV those vars should be set in the profiles instead, and a > quick scan shows that indeed most (maybe all? didn't count them) > profiles set them already, so there isn't really a point in having them > in make.conf too, except to mak

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why arch-specific make.conf files?

2005-11-15 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 20:26 +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > On Tuesday 15 November 2005 20:19, Marius Mauch wrote: > > From my POV those vars should be set in the profiles instead, and a > > quick scan shows that indeed most (maybe all? didn't count them) > > profiles set them already, so

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why arch-specific make.conf files?

2005-11-15 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 20:19 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: > Hi, > > Was just about to finally commit the elog related config stuff into > make.conf just to notice (again) that there are 14 (in words: fourteen) > different make.conf files there, with almost all of them just differing > in CFLAGS and C

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why arch-specific make.conf files?

2005-11-15 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Tuesday 15 November 2005 20:19, Marius Mauch wrote: > From my POV those vars should be set in the profiles instead, and a > quick scan shows that indeed most (maybe all? didn't count them) > profiles set them already, so there isn't really a point in having them > in make.conf too, except to mak

[gentoo-dev] Why arch-specific make.conf files?

2005-11-15 Thread Marius Mauch
Hi, Was just about to finally commit the elog related config stuff into make.conf just to notice (again) that there are 14 (in words: fourteen) different make.conf files there, with almost all of them just differing in CFLAGS and CHOST (only exception is make.conf.mac which isn't used anymore in a