Hi,
I wanted to announce that the science herd took on its first herd tester
(Lucas Chiesa (tulku)) nearly a month ago. We also have a few others in the
pipeline. Due to the technical nature of some of the scientific packages we
felt that herd testers would be especially appropriate for the sci
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 13:06 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
> Sending it out a day before the meeting isn't exactly a good thing.
> I'd
> rather wait to look through those details instead of getting them a
> day
> before they vote on them.
I got busy and forgot to post it to the list. If it
Thierry Carrez wrote: [Mon Nov 14 2005, 10:28:23AM CST]
> v 1.3 looks like a revised version to me (on Nov 11) :
> http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/xml/htdocs/proj/en/glep/glep-0041.txt?r2=1.3&root=gentoo&r1=1.2&diff_format=u
Hmmm, I'm not sure how I missed that one, but clearly I did. D
Homer Parker wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 18:11 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:02:43 -0600 Homer Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>wrote:
>>| I uploaded it the end of last week. Looks to be updated on
>>| the web site.
>>
>>Hrm, but you didn't post it to -dev for discuss
Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thierry Carrez wrote: [Mon Nov 14 2005, 03:09:24AM CST]
> > Voting
> > - GLEP 41 (requested by Homer Parker)
>
> My recollection was that GLEP 41 was rejected at the last
> meeting, although a revised GLEP could be resubmitted for approval. As
> far as
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 18:11 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:02:43 -0600 Homer Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | I uploaded it the end of last week. Looks to be updated on
> | the web site.
>
> Hrm, but you didn't post it to -dev for discussion?
If you wish
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:02:43 -0600 Homer Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| I uploaded it the end of last week. Looks to be updated on
| the web site.
Hrm, but you didn't post it to -dev for discussion?
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!)
Mail: ciaranm
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 14:29 -0600, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Homer Parker wrote: [Fri Nov 11 2005, 08:09:11PM CST]
> > Just want to be sure that GLEP41 is on the list.
>
> GLEP 41 was rejected by the council at the last meeting, pending a
> rewrite that addressed the issues brought up at that m
Grant Goodyear wrote:
> My recollection was that GLEP 41 was rejected at the last
> meeting, although a revised GLEP could be resubmitted for approval. As
> far as I know, however, the GLEP has not yet been revised.
v 1.3 looks like a revised version to me (on Nov 11) :
http://www.gentoo.org/cgi
Marius Mauch wrote: [Mon Nov 14 2005, 08:05:44AM CST]
> > Discussion
> > - Portage Tree signing status (requested by Marius Mauch)
>
> Ehm, I didn't request anything. Grant did ;)
Yep, I did make the request, but it is genone who did all of the hard
work. I'm just pushy. *Grin*
-g2boojum-
--
Thierry Carrez wrote: [Mon Nov 14 2005, 03:09:24AM CST]
> Voting
> - GLEP 41 (requested by Homer Parker)
My recollection was that GLEP 41 was rejected at the last
meeting, although a revised GLEP could be resubmitted for approval. As
far as I know, however, the GLEP has not yet been revised.
-g2
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:09:24 +0100
Thierry Carrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The November Gentoo Council meeting will be held on #gentoo-council
> Tuesday, November 15th, 20:00 UTC, presided by Seemant Kulleen.
>
> The following items have been put on the agenda :
>
> Voting
> - GLEP 41 (reque
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:25:33 +0100
Thierry Carrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 22:37:15 + Stuart Herbert
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > | For example, there's no real reason why GLSA's couldn't been
> > delivered | via this at some point (alth
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 22:34 +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 10:26 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > If users are interested in non-critical information, there's already a
> > mechanism in place for them to get such things. They can join the
> > mailing lists. Do we not alrea
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 08:12:25 +0100 (CET)
Daniel Ahlberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is an automatically created email message.
> http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14406 ebuilds.
Just FYI, it doesn't display correctly in Opera - I can provide screenshots if
you want
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 22:37:15 + Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | For example, there's no real reason why GLSA's couldn't been delivered
> | via this at some point (although I'd prefer a "You have X amount of
> | security fixes to apply" type message adding
The November Gentoo Council meeting will be held on #gentoo-council
Tuesday, November 15th, 20:00 UTC, presided by Seemant Kulleen.
The following items have been put on the agenda :
Voting
- GLEP 41 (requested by Homer Parker)
Discussion
- Portage Tree signing status (requested by Marius Mauch)
17 matches
Mail list logo
