[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-11-13 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14406 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-13 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:43:14 -0500 Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | One usually adapts to unforseen problems, not ones that are known | going into the project. | | Your suggestion is akin to buying a car that you know has bad tires, a | bad alternator, a rusted body, and sundry other thing

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-13 Thread Dan Meltzer
One usually adapts to unforseen problems, not ones that are known going into the project. Your suggestion is akin to buying a car that you know has bad tires, a bad alternator, a rusted body, and sundry other things wrong with it for full price, and just planning on fixing when it actually breaks.

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-13 Thread Stuart Herbert
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 10:26 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > If users are interested in non-critical information, there's already a > mechanism in place for them to get such things. They can join the > mailing lists. Do we not already have a gentoo-events list? We also > have a gentoo-releng lis

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting Tuesday, November 15th, 20:00 UTC

2005-11-13 Thread Grant Goodyear
Homer Parker wrote: [Fri Nov 11 2005, 08:09:11PM CST] > Just want to be sure that GLEP41 is on the list. GLEP 41 was rejected by the council at the last meeting, pending a rewrite that addressed the issues brought up at that meeting: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20051

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting Tuesday, November 15th, 20:00 UTC

2005-11-13 Thread Grant Goodyear
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: [Tue Nov 08 2005, 12:04:51PM CST] > On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:57:54 + Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | Assuming there aren't any further comments between now and then, I'd > | like GLEP 34 (GLEP File Hosting) to be approved please. > > No, 43. Not 34. Bleh.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-13 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 01:05 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > It is my opinion that the news reading application need not be > > integrated into portage. As far as I have understood it, the only real > > thing that anyone has required portage itself to do is to > > *automatically* spit out "You have

[gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-13 Thread Duncan
Chris Gianelloni posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Sat, 12 Nov 2005 10:26:08 -0500: >> I hope that the technical solution will allow users to choose to see >> news about packages that are not installed - so that we can deliver news >> that isn't strictly package related, such as new