Dan Meltzer wrote:
Forever.
How about, "as long as relevant"? ;)
--de.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Jason Stubbs wrote:
To be honest, this is the part that I don't like the most. Integrating code
into portage to copy files here and there based on some predefined rules and
news readers reading and renaming files based on some predefined rules...
A filesystem based API just doesn't seem very ro
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 21:33 +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
Hence emerge --news.
Why?
There's no "emerge --etc" or "emerge --etc-update" functionality. Why
must it be "emerge --news" at all?
# emerge --help config
probably an emerge --help news that explains the basic
Hi,
Thanks to all of you who participated in the survey on open source.
Those who didnt still can. It is now available online at:
http://www.surveyconsole.com/console/TakeSurvey?id=136086
Thanks in advance!
Hania Sabbidin
- Forwarded message from Hania Sabbidin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
On Sunday 13 November 2005 00:34, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 13:39 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > On Saturday 12 November 2005 07:19, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> > > When we have emerge --news done,
> >
> > I keep seeing references to "emerge --news" but at the same time am
> > see
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 04:32 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> I agree to some extent with both viewpoints, here. I think the viewpoint
> of the "portage first" side is that we already have the "traditional"
> stuff, the announce and dev list, the GWN, the forums, and "system
> changing" announcements general
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 13:39 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Saturday 12 November 2005 07:19, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> > When we have emerge --news done,
>
> I keep seeing references to "emerge --news" but at the same time am seeing
> that news readers are external. What exactly is `emerge --news`
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 00:57 +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 18:22 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > It seems to be your own quest to have the news *only*
> > delivered by portage.
>
> I thought I'd been very clear in the email that you've replied to that I
> support making
On Saturday 12 November 2005 22:11, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> I've had a go at creating a generic plugin framework for portage. The
> attached patch contains:
Gah! Apologies again.
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
I've had a go at creating a generic plugin framework for portage. The attached
patch contains:
* plugins/__init__.py that does plugin searching and loading.
* plugins/cache/__init__.py which specifies what class cache plugins must
derive from.
* cache/{anydbm,flat_hash,flat_list,metadata,sqlite
Grobian posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Sat, 12
Nov 2005 09:49:11 +0100:
> Stuart Herbert wrote:
>> I thought I'd been very clear in the email that you've replied to that I
>> support making the news available via other ways. It's the timing that
>> I'm a bit worried about.
>
>
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 10:01:33PM -0600, Edward Muller wrote:
> Anyone know how safe/unsafe dev-python/setuptools-0.6_alpha5 is? I am
> building
> an ebuild for Turbogears and a current version of setuptools is required.
Just in case you haven't seen it, you should take a look at
http://eggs.ge
Stuart Herbert wrote:
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 18:22 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
It seems to be your own quest to have the news *only*
delivered by portage.
I thought I'd been very clear in the email that you've replied to that I
support making the news available via other ways. It's the ti
13 matches
Mail list logo
