Paul de Vrieze wrote:
I agree here. If you don't want packages to be pulled in because of header
files, you need support for that (perhaps in the form of subpackages, or
a useflag). But IF the header files of a package are installed one should
be able to assume that they keep on working. Even
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:43:39AM +0600, Norguhtar wrote:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110171
How obtain USE flags from emerged apps? But when i'm changed flags end
emerge -vp package, emerge report about change in flags and highlited
flag at green.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:43:39AM +0600, Norguhtar wrote:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110171
>
> How obtain USE flags from emerged apps? But when i'm changed flags end
> emerge -vp package, emerge report about change in flags and highlited
> flag at green.
inherit eutils
...
if !
Please forget my earlier email. After having a closer look almost all of those
ebuilds get the hompage set via the eclass they inherit, so Simons statement
is pretty much void.
Carsten
pgpc6tkeiU21V.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 18:55, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> > Maybe for some people compiling is included in runtime, but I'm not
> > one of them.
>
> I am. I frequently compile software against installed libraries in my
> day job. I don't run into this problem solely because I don't install
> bina
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 22:38, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:05:00 -0400 solar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | You two are the ones trying to distort the meaning of RDEPEND=
> | simply because the depclean is broken for the cases you make.
>
> Not at all. The 'R' in RDEPEND mean
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 07:18, Ned Ludd wrote:
> > Now, the other side of the story. It's not true runtime dependence
> > because it's not required for programs to run, only to compile. And
> > the way I see it, things required for programs to compile are by
> > definition DEPEND rather than RD
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 08:01, Spider (D.m.D. Lj.) wrote:
>
> actually, I'm not in agreement here. If I install libfoo, be it from
> binaries or source, I certainly expect to be able to use libfoo, and
> that includes being able to build software against it, things I work
> on myself, other sou
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 15:41 -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 11:03 -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> >
> >>>What would be your recommendation on how to handle this for mips, then?
> >>>Make the virtual alsa-driver?
> >>
> >>This wouldn't work, as
