On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 22:51 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Spider (D.m.D. Lj.) wrote:
> | Why? Because they just install the hard RDEPEND, so if you have a system
> | installed from binaries, you get working linking, but nothing will
> | compile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Spider (D.m.D. Lj.) wrote:
| Why? Because they just install the hard RDEPEND, so if you have a system
| installed from binaries, you get working linking, but nothing will
| compile for the system.
Right, until you actually install the build-time deps
> - - Binary packages don't require the header packages.
Theese are the main cause of pain in situations like this.
Why? Because they just install the hard RDEPEND, so if you have a system
installed from binaries, you get working linking, but nothing will
compile for the system.
Theese level
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
- - Packages requiring the headers have to DEPEND on them directly,
because DEPENDs don't cascade. (Although this brings to mind the concept
of some sort of cascadable DEPEND.)
I remember some sort of BDEPEND idea being proposed awhile back, but
that was for something d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Spider (D.m.D. Lj.) wrote:
| If your package, libFoo, installs .h files that directly require header
| files from libBar, then you have a Runtime dependency on libBar, not
| only a compile time dependency
|
|
| Why? Because libFoo should be usable
okay, this came up in a discussion today, and I figured it was time to
mention something about it here:
If your package, libFoo, installs .h files that directly require header
files from libBar, then you have a Runtime dependency on libBar, not
only a compile time dependency
Why? Because lib
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Dan Armak wrote:
On Monday 24 October 2005 19:24, Ferris McCormick wrote:
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 18:48 +0200, Dan Armak wrote:
Don't post such questions here. Go to the gentoo-user mailing list, the
forums, or irc. This list is
On Monday 24 October 2005 19:24, Ferris McCormick wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 18:48 +0200, Dan Armak wrote:
> > Don't post such questions here. Go to the gentoo-user mailing list, the
> > forums, or irc. This list is for discussion of Gentoo development.
>
> Actually, this is a discussion of X-m
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
I thought it was of big purple cows
Well yes, and no... I'm working on the Cobalt RaQ's, little 1U rack mounts that
have purple front plates.
Jeff
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Massimiliano Bellomo wrote:
a lot of blocks by a phantom package xorg-x11-7 !!
Any ideas ??
# echo "x11-base/xorg-x11-6.8.2-r6" >> /etc/portage/profile/package.provided
--de.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:41:26 -0400 "Stephen P. Becker"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Unfortunately, we don't have any member of the mips team that really
| does much with sound (where did that Indy go to anyway?)
eradicator.
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 11:03 -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
What would be your recommendation on how to handle this for mips, then?
Make the virtual alsa-driver?
This wouldn't work, as none of our alsa drivers are actually provided by
alsa-driver.
OK. How does it
> > Strange that I'm still around then...
>
> oh, you're not.. You just haven't realised it yet. I've heard that
> happens to a few zombies. *grin*
>
"RE: bad Halloween puns (WAS RE: New Developer: CHTEKK)" anyone? :D
Thanks,
Chris
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 16:12 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Monday 24 October 2005 15:03, Spider (D.m.D. Lj.) wrote:
> > (usually we only stab people, and that's mostly due to bad puns like
> > those of lu_zero ;)
> Strange that I'm still around then...
oh, you're not.. You just have
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 18:48 +0200, Dan Armak wrote:
> Don't post such questions here. Go to the gentoo-user mailing list, the
> forums, or irc. This list is for discussion of Gentoo development.
Actually, this is a discussion of X-modular, and up to now, all
X-modular posts have come here (it is
Hi,
Well, I just started to create wxMaxima ebuild, but checking if it was in
bugs.gentoo.org as a new package waiting for developer, it's created...
But I'll look what packages does gentoo need, and I'll create their ebuilds.
Thanks,
Rafael Fernández López.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing lis
Don't post such questions here. Go to the gentoo-user mailing list, the
forums, or irc. This list is for discussion of Gentoo development.
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069
Apologies. This was meant to go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
I'm not a developer considered in Gentoo project, but I have a little time
that I can give Gentoo everyday. I submitted yesterday tkgate ebuild (new
package in portage), and I am going to start wxmaxima ebuild.
I know that developers are actually busy, and they have lots of things to
do. Thos
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 11:03 -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> > What would be your recommendation on how to handle this for mips, then?
> > Make the virtual alsa-driver?
>
> This wouldn't work, as none of our alsa drivers are actually provided by
> alsa-driver.
OK. How does it work now, then?
Dave Nebinger posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Mon, 24 Oct 2005 06:47:16 -0400:
> I eventually killed it and system load dropped back to normal. Commented out
> the PORTAGE_NICENESS value and emerged boost again.
>
> This time the system pegged again, but the whole process was fi
What would be your recommendation on how to handle this for mips, then?
Make the virtual alsa-driver?
This wouldn't work, as none of our alsa drivers are actually provided by
alsa-driver.
-Steve
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 09:56 -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 09:18 -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> >
> >>>If there are no objections before Friday, I'm going to change
> >>>virtual/alsa in base to sys-kernel/gentoo-sources.
> >>>
> >>>Now, if th
Hi,
i've this problem with emerge -uD world:
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating world dependencies ...done!
[blocks B ] http://insue.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-sony
Linux-Sony Documentation: http://insue.com/linux/phpwiki
IRC: freenode.net, #linux-sony
--
gent
On Monday 24 October 2005 15:03, Spider (D.m.D. Lj.) wrote:
> (usually we only stab people, and that's mostly due to bad puns like
> those of lu_zero ;)
Strange that I'm still around then...
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, A
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 09:18 -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
If there are no objections before Friday, I'm going to change
virtual/alsa in base to sys-kernel/gentoo-sources.
Now, if there are any arch-specific sources (sparc? mips?) that don't
provide ALSA, please let me
Spider (D.m.D. Lj.) wrote:
>Welcome aboard, We don't bite.. Much.
>(usually we only stab people, and that's mostly due to bad puns like
>those of lu_zero ;)
>
>//Spider
>
>
>
Heh ;)
Thanks to all of you for the warm welcome! :)
--
Best regards,
Luca Longinotti aka CHTEKK
LongiTEKK Networks
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 09:18 -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> > If there are no objections before Friday, I'm going to change
> > virtual/alsa in base to sys-kernel/gentoo-sources.
> >
> > Now, if there are any arch-specific sources (sparc? mips?) that don't
> > provide ALSA, please let me know be
If there are no objections before Friday, I'm going to change
virtual/alsa in base to sys-kernel/gentoo-sources.
Now, if there are any arch-specific sources (sparc? mips?) that don't
provide ALSA, please let me know before then, so I will know to add the
virtual to those architectures for media-s
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 16:20 +0530, Shyam Mani wrote:
> Jan Kundrát wrote:
> > For more details about why we've chosen to recommend the in-kernel way
> > please
> > see bug 92622 [1].
> >
> > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92622
>
> Also https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98772
Welcome aboard, We don't bite.. Much.
(usually we only stab people, and that's mostly due to bad puns like
those of lu_zero ;)
//Spider
--
begin .signature
Tortured users / Laughing in pain
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end
signature.asc
Description: This is a digi
Mike Doty wrote:
I like fantasy books & stuff, as well as science-fiction and animes, I
generally read a lot.
Welcome! Have a lot of fun and beware of weredevs, they could byte you =)
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Developer Gentoo/PPC Operational Leader
http://dev.gentoo.org/~l
On Sunday 23 October 2005 19:16, Jeff Walter wrote:
> From the land of little purple boxes, welcome.
I thought it was of big purple cows
Btw, welcome Luca.. now we really start having problems when using just the
first names :P
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flam
I *think* it should go to user mailing list, forums, or somewhere else
where it's not [OT].
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 06:47 -0400, Dave Nebinger wrote:
> So I set PORTAGE_NICENESS to 19 in /etc/make.conf on my primary gentoo
> desktop so I could do emerges in the background and still use my box...
>
Jan Kundrát wrote:
> For more details about why we've chosen to recommend the in-kernel way please
> see bug 92622 [1].
>
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92622
Also https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98772
Regards,
--
Shyam Mani | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
docs-team | http://gdp
So I set PORTAGE_NICENESS to 19 in /etc/make.conf on my primary gentoo
desktop so I could do emerges in the background and still use my box...
Well tonight I emerged boost... The system maxed out and ran that way for an
hour without looking like it was going to complete anytime soon. Which
woul
21.10.2005, 13:51:17, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 04:37:16 -0700 Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Also consider the case of media-libs/libsdl. It uses novideo,
> | noaudio, and nojoystick, for the simple reason that for the vast
> | majority of folks who'd have reason to me
From the land of little purple boxes, welcome.
--
Jeff Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo/Cobalt x86 http://dev.gentoo.org/~jeffw/
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Thanks to the dedicated work of Joshua Baergen and me, you've got just
what you asked for -- newer X than even money can buy. Pound on it, test
it, break it, and file bugs. Let us know how it works.
You probably already know of it, but when following your modular-X HOWTO
Also if Luca said 25 days at 15 october, I'd like to push for a quicker death
to quicktime4linux.
1.x version is unmainatined and had its bug, 2.0 had quite a bit of screwups
(was marked ~sparc, but required nasm!), it can be built only on Linux x86
and Linux AMD64 (and I don't trust the code e
Yay! Another member of the Swiss conspiracy!
Welcome to Gentoo, Luca
--
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Co-Lead
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 13694 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Welcome CHTEKK :)
- --
Krzysiek 'Nelchael' Pawlik
GPG:0xBC51
Lottery: A tax on people who are bad at math.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDW86Tgo/w9rxVVVERAhrFAJ4jdPekY6chR7HFQW4kyz/5C1excACdHjX+
Wdfa5AJ5a
Mike Doty schrieb:
> Take a moment to welcome the newest developer, Luca Longinotti.
Mae govannen, Luca!
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/
GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6867 C514 B85B 5D69
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP di
On Sunday 23 October 2005 15:45, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> One question; is the waitpid(x,0) necessary in the case where SIGKILL
> wasn't sent? Is waitpid(x,os.NOHANG) enough to clean up the zombie when
> SIGTERM succeeds? If so, the waitpid(x,0) could be indented into the "if
> not timeout:" block.
I
45 matches
Mail list logo
