Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting

2005-09-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 26 September 2005 12:01 am, Andrew Muraco wrote: > 1) would ?arch become the old ~arch, if it was implemented? > 2) would people actually try to run a full ?arch system? > 3) #2, would it be possible without breakage? if we went with a testing mask it'd mean that users would be forced to

Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting

2005-09-25 Thread Andrew Muraco
In response to all replies Thus far, I as a User, I expect that arch works (no matter what) - no arguments there I assume that ~arch will work 95% of the time. I never ever touch anything in p.mask. Now, where do we put packages that could work for most users, but they might not work for the oth

[gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

2005-09-25 Thread Daniel Ahlberg
Hi, This is an automatically created email message. http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 12116 ebuilds. The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds. The tests are: * if a version has been masked for 30 days or more. * if an arch was in KE

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of new-style Apache

2005-09-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 25 September 2005 04:30 am, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Carsten Lohrke wrote: > > On Thursday 08 September 2005 03:48, Michael Stewart (vericgar) wrote: > >> - A new gentoo-webroot that will eventually provide a gentoo-themed > >> icon-set, error documents, and default website. This has bee

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization of new-style Apache

2005-09-25 Thread Thierry Carrez
Carsten Lohrke wrote: > On Thursday 08 September 2005 03:48, Michael Stewart (vericgar) wrote: > >> - A new gentoo-webroot that will eventually provide a gentoo-themed >> icon-set, error documents, and default website. This has been put in >> it's own package, and includes a USE-flag to not in