splite-gentoo posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
excerpted below, on Fri, 02 Sep 2005 14:33:22 -0500:
> Actually, what I want is a 32-bit x86 userland with a 64-bit kernel and
> multilib'd gcc, bintools, and glibc. In other words, a 32-bit userland
> that my users can still compile and run their 64-bit
'Ello,
On Friday 02 Sep 2005 19:30, Tom Martin wrote:
> Hi again list,
>
> One more new developer is on board. Edgar is going to be reviving the
> Xbox port of Gentoo. I must apologise for this email being slightly
> late: I must apologise for this email being slightly late. Some of you
> may reco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2005-09-02 15:46:23 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 02 September 2005 02:12 pm, Armando Di Cianno wrote:
=gcc-3.4.3-r1 and
lemme rephrase
what needs to happen in the gcc ebuilds so that we can punt the
libffi packag
Thanks for let me being a part of gentoo.
cu
gimli
Tom Martin wrote:
Hi again list,
One more new developer is on board. Edgar is going to be reviving the
Xbox port of Gentoo. I must apologise for this email being slightly
late: I must apologise for this email being slightly late. Some of you
On Friday 02 September 2005 21:45, Tom Martin wrote:
> What I *meant* to say was 'I must apologise for this email being
> slightly late: Edgar has already made a couple of commits.' Sorry for my
> raving lunacy.
There is no problem, everybody can There is no problem everybody can say
something wro
On Friday 02 September 2005 02:12 pm, Armando Di Cianno wrote:
> > =gcc-3.4.3-r1 and > 'objc' is used (regardless of 'gcj', which always installs it); i.e.
> > the patch is already in there for that stated range of versions.
lemme rephrase
what needs to happen in the gcc ebuilds so that we can p
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 08:30:37PM +0100, Tom Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One more new developer is on board. Edgar is going to be reviving the
> Xbox port of Gentoo. I must apologise for this email being slightly
> late: I must apologise for this email being slightly late. Some of you
> ma
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 07:42:46PM +0200, Simon Stelling wrote:
>
> Also, you can't compare sparc32/sparc64 to x86/amd64: sparc64 is just a
> 64bit kernel with a 32bit userland. For users who want that, there is
> already a keyword: x86.
Actually, what I want is a 32-bit x86 userland with a 64-b
Hi again list,
One more new developer is on board. Edgar is going to be reviving the
Xbox port of Gentoo. I must apologise for this email being slightly
late: I must apologise for this email being slightly late. Some of you
may recognise gimli_xbox from IRC -- it's the same chap.
Edgar works as a
Ok...
Linux oneill 2.6.13-gentoo-hugemem #3 Fri Sep 2 11:41:01 PDT 2005 i686
AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2800+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
Linux version 2.6.13-gentoo-hugemem ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
3.3.5-20050130 (Gentoo 3.3.5.20050130-r1, ssp-3.3.5.20050130-1,
pie-8.7.7.1)) #3 Fri Sep 2 11:41:01
'Ello List,
On Friday 02 Sep 2005 18:12, Chris White wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With mcummings recently leaving the team and many of the perl herd
> members
> currently inactive, the perl herd could really use some help. The two main
> areas are working on core perl, and working on perl supporte
Hi all,
With mcummings recently leaving the team and many of the perl herd
members
currently inactive, the perl herd could really use some help. The two main
areas are working on core perl, and working on perl supported ebuilds. Perl
supported ebuild devs should have a perl developme
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2005-09-02 13:07:23 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been trying to phase out dev-libs/libffi for a long while...if
someone can figure out a patch for gcc-3.3 series that compiles and
installs libffi w/o building the entirety o
On Friday 02 September 2005 01:00 pm, Armando Di Cianno wrote:
> On 2005-09-02 12:05:38 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 02 September 2005 11:50 am, Gustavo Zacarias wrote:
> >> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> any known/standing issues people wish to get out before we move
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2005-09-02 12:05:38 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 02 September 2005 11:50 am, Gustavo Zacarias wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
any known/standing issues people wish to get out before we move
gcc-3.3.6
to x86 stable ?
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005 12:05:38 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| On Friday 02 September 2005 11:50 am, Gustavo Zacarias wrote:
| > Mike Frysinger wrote:
| > > any known/standing issues people wish to get out before we move
| > > gcc-3.3.6 to x86 stable ?
| >
| > You'll also need a matc
On Friday 02 September 2005 11:50 am, Gustavo Zacarias wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > any known/standing issues people wish to get out before we move gcc-3.3.6
> > to x86 stable ?
>
> You'll also need a matching dev-libs/libffi, otherwise it'll go all
> circular for people using GNUstep.
toolc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> any known/standing issues people wish to get out before we move gcc-3.3.6 to
> x86 stable ?
You'll also need a matching dev-libs/libffi, otherwise it'll go all
circular for people using GNUstep.
- --
Gustavo Zacarias
Gentoo/
This driver has been stagnant for a *long* time. It was assigned to me
as the maintainer, but I have never owned this hardware. Anyway, the
current driver version in the Linux Aironet Configuration Utilities
tarball, which is version 2.1, does not work under 2.6 kernels and needs
to be ported. W
On Friday 02 September 2005 08:40 am, Mike Doty wrote:
> I've had issues compiling 3.3.6 with the hardened toolchain(cc1 dies
> with a try_split error), but I hear that this is specific to hardened.
that, unfortunately, is both specific to hardened and unspecific to
gcc-3.3.6 ... 3.3.5 and 3.4.x
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
| any known/standing issues people wish to get out before we move
gcc-3.3.6 to
| x86 stable ?
|
| for those brave, please emerge gcc-3.3.6 on your stable x86 box and
give it a
| twirl
| -mike
I've had issues compiling 3.3.6 with
On Fri, 2005-02-09 at 18:32 +0900, Chris White wrote:
> Ok, that should sum it up, and currently there's another thread about x86
> arch
> team creation which seems to be going well.
On top of that.. We are abusing bug #104525 as a discussion board on the
new x86 team.
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Grant Goodyear wrote:
| Christian Parpart wrote: [Thu Sep 01 2005, 05:45:43PM CDT]
|
|>This just leads me to assume you're not really a coder (wrt native
|>programming languages like C/C++), are you?
|
|
| *Grin* This sort of condescending attitude i
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 09:25 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 22:21 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 30 August 2005 10:15 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 21:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 30 August 2005 09:41 pm, Sven Köhle
Ok, say yah, this thread is to long, so I decided, "Hey, let's make a
summary of the main important points". That way everyone doesn't have to
read threads that are longer than the combined code of portage.
So, let's get started
First off, this great guy named Grant decided it was a good i
25 matches
Mail list logo
