-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As a further note on this:
We will be dropping all patches that are not upstream and are not
obviously Gentoo-specific configuration changes.
If you want your patch back in, you will _need_ to file it upstream and
have it committed before we will re
On 2/8/2005 16:30:45, Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
> > I'm still awaiting any solid arguments against x11-proto, and they had
> > best be expedited (read below for why).
>
> Well, I kind of mentioned it on irc, but I'll th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:
| If I understand correctly, all of the packages in x11-proto will only
| install header files. Are these header files ever useful on their own
| though? Would it make more sense to include the header files
| in various
If I understand correctly, all of the packages in x11-proto will only
install header files. Are these header files ever useful on their own
though? Would it make more sense to include the header files
in various library packages?
--
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 10:52:44 -0700 Donnie Berkholz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| | Files in /etc are expensive in terms of sysadmin time. The only
| | things in /etc should be things that are both necessary and likely
| | to be modified by a sysadmin.
|
| So we should stop
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 13:48:17 -0400 Alec Joseph Warner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > Files in /etc are expensive in terms of sysadmin time. The only
| > things in /etc should be things that are both necessary and likely
| > to be modified by a sysadmin.
| >
| And who makes that call, shouldn't the
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Tom Martin wrote:
> | Hi list,
> |
> | Bug 97447 wants a logrotate USE flag, which is used by about five
> | packages locally. Unless there are any objections, I'll globalify it
> | later today.
>
> I think this flag is a bad idea. Why should I have to recompile a
> packag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| Files in /etc are expensive in terms of sysadmin time. The only things
| in /etc should be things that are both necessary and likely to be
| modified by a sysadmin.
So we should stop installing example files, too?
-BEGIN
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 09:48:25 -0700 Donnie Berkholz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Tom Martin wrote:
| | Hi list,
| |
| | Bug 97447 wants a logrotate USE flag, which is used by about five
| | packages locally. Unless there are any objections, I'll globalify it
| | later today.
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 09:48:25 -0700 Donnie Berkholz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Tom Martin wrote:
| | Hi list,
| |
| | Bug 97447 wants a logrotate USE flag, which is used by about five
| | packages locally. Unless there are any objections, I'll globalify it
| | later today.
|
| I think this flag i
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 18:04 +0100, Tom Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 08:17:08AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you make the flag global, can you make sure that all of the packages
> > that use this flag exhibit the same behavior when using it. If they all
>
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 08:17:08AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> If you make the flag global, can you make sure that all of the packages
> that use this flag exhibit the same behavior when using it. If they all
> do their own thing, then I would suggest leaving it local.
>
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 02:23:06PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Your suggestion of adding a few new virtuals is a good idea, but I think
> the metabuilds for libraries, drivers, etc. can substitute for it. It's
> not clear to me that there are many common configurations that could be
> dealt wit
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Martin wrote:
| Hi list,
|
| Bug 97447 wants a logrotate USE flag, which is used by about five
| packages locally. Unless there are any objections, I'll globalify it
| later today.
I think this flag is a bad idea. Why sho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Martin wrote:
| Hi list,
|
| Bug 97447 wants a logrotate USE flag, which is used by about five
| packages locally. Unless there are any objections, I'll globalify it
| later today.
I think this flag is a bad idea. Why should I have to recompile a
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 01 August 2005 09:22 pm, Alec Warner wrote:
Many people do not like the fact that a USE flag changes CFLAGS.
Although there are other USE flags that do this too ( pic comes to mind
in a couple ebuilds, checkpassword fex ) they are a minority compared to
debug.
On Monday 01 August 2005 10:43 pm, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger schrieb:
> |>your USE=pic example is wrong, it does not change CFLAGS (and if your
> |>package does, it is broken)
>
> chillispot at least is not wrong. If USE="pic" is set, it compiles _only
> with_ -fPIC, ommiting to compile
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I'm still awaiting any solid arguments against x11-proto, and they had
best be expedited (read below for why).
Well, I kind of mentioned it on irc, but I'll throw it out here too.
I think the name "proto" is pretty vague and would prefer
to see header
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 10:22:01AM +0100, Tom Martin wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Bug 97447 wants a logrotate USE flag, which is used by about five
> packages locally. Unless there are any objections, I'll globalify it
> later today.
>
You may want to read over this thread from April when the logrotate
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 10:22 +0100, Tom Martin wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Bug 97447 wants a logrotate USE flag, which is used by about five
> packages locally. Unless there are any objections, I'll globalify it
> later today.
If you make the flag global, can you make sure that all of the packages
that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger schrieb:
| On Monday 01 August 2005 10:43 pm, Danny van Dyk wrote:
|
|>chillispot at least is not wrong. If USE="pic" is set, it compiles _only
|>with_ -fPIC, ommiting to compile files twice and effectivly telling
|>libtool not to produ
On Tuesday, August 02, 2005 2:22 am, Tom Martin wrote:
> Bug 97447 wants a logrotate USE flag, which is used by about five
> packages locally. Unless there are any objections, I'll globalify it
> later today.
I'd welcome this, almost as much as a global do_not_install_cron_tasks flag.
--
Anthon
Hi list,
Bug 97447 wants a logrotate USE flag, which is used by about five
packages locally. Unless there are any objections, I'll globalify it
later today.
Tom
--
Tom Martin, http://dev.gentoo.org/~slarti
AMD64, net-mail, shell-tools, vim, recruiters
Gentoo Linux
pgpBtgHxX9V5k.pgp
Descriptio
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:45:05AM -0600, Keziah W wrote:
> I got this idea and I'm not sure if it would be feasible, but if it is,
> it could lead to many Cool Things:
> Is there any reason not to have dynamic libraries for most of the
> changes made by USE flags, that are used only if present, an
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
| The new categories are x11-apps, x11-proto and x11-drivers. Of these,
| the name for x11-proto (the protocol headers) is debatable. The upstream
| module they're all in is called "proto," and their pkg-
25 matches
Mail list logo
