Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugday Improvements

2005-07-18 Thread Scott Shawcroft
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jonathan Smith wrote: > Scott Shawcroft wrote: > >> - Have pre-bugday and post-bugday podcasts designed to present >> information in an alternate form. > > > i like it, but also make it available as an .mp3 or a more common > format (i know nothing ab

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugday Improvements

2005-07-18 Thread Homer Parker
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 19:35 -0700, Scott Shawcroft wrote: > What bottlenecks exist in closing bugs? Testing and time.. We have found on the amd64 team (and I hope ppc has found the same) that ATs have been very helpful with testing, which allows the devs to do other things. -- Homer Park

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugday Improvements

2005-07-18 Thread Jonathan Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Scott Shawcroft wrote: > - Have pre-bugday and post-bugday podcasts designed to present > information in an alternate form. i like it, but also make it available as an .mp3 or a more common format (i know nothing about podcasting or if mplayer could p

[gentoo-dev] Bugday Improvements

2005-07-18 Thread Scott Shawcroft
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You guys may have noticed or heard about additions to the staff by kloeri. I am one of the new devs. GurliGebis has also joined gentoo. Our task is to take bugdays off of kloeri's hands. With kloeri's guidance we're brainstorming ways to increase

[gentoo-dev] Re: ebuild development (vpopmail, etc.)

2005-07-18 Thread Duncan
Casey Allen Shobe posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:13:28 +: > On Monday 18 July 2005 06:57, Donnie Berkholz wrote: >> On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 22:07 -0700, Anthony Gorecki wrote: >> > On Sunday, July 17, 2005 9:26 pm, Casey Allen Shobe wrote: >> > > I'm also a

Re: [gentoo-dev] /etc/profile.d/

2005-07-18 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: | On Monday 18 July 2005 07:47 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote: | |>Mike Frysinger wrote: |>| can we get you to actively remove the file then ? or move it into the |> |>docs |> |>| dir as like an example file, xprint.profile.d |> |>OK

Re: [gentoo-dev] /etc/profile.d/

2005-07-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 18 July 2005 07:47 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > | can we get you to actively remove the file then ? or move it into the > > docs > > | dir as like an example file, xprint.profile.d > > OK, all the ebuilds are putting them as docs now. If anyone actually > uses xpr

Re: [gentoo-dev] /etc/profile.d/

2005-07-18 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: | can we get you to actively remove the file then ? or move it into the docs | dir as like an example file, xprint.profile.d OK, all the ebuilds are putting them as docs now. If anyone actually uses xprint and it breaks, let me

Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild development (vpopmail, etc.)

2005-07-18 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 18:19 +, Casey Allen Shobe wrote: > On Monday 18 July 2005 13:19, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > If you're simply looking to submit this one ebuild, then file a > > bug on bugs.gentoo.org and attach the ebuild to it. > > I'm sure there will be more - there are a number of eb

Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild development (vpopmail, etc.)

2005-07-18 Thread Casey Allen Shobe
On Monday 18 July 2005 13:19, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > If you're simply looking to submit this one ebuild, then file a > bug on bugs.gentoo.org and attach the ebuild to it. I'm sure there will be more - there are a number of ebuilds I have small issues with that I just workaround. I'm much more

Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild development (vpopmail, etc.)

2005-07-18 Thread Jonathan Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Casey Allen Shobe wrote: > I'm sure there will be more - there are a number of ebuilds I have > small issues with that I just workaround. I'm much more inclined > to just fix the problem instead of complaining about it because of > past experiences

Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild development (vpopmail, etc.)

2005-07-18 Thread Casey Allen Shobe
On Monday 18 July 2005 06:57, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 22:07 -0700, Anthony Gorecki wrote: > > On Sunday, July 17, 2005 9:26 pm, Casey Allen Shobe wrote: > > > I'm also a bit confused about the portdir_overlay thing - If > > > there exists a -r15, do I then add a -r16 to make

Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild development (vpopmail, etc.)

2005-07-18 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 04:26 +, Casey Allen Shobe wrote: > What do I need to do to get started on this? Do I simply mail a > patch to this list, or ask somebody for a CVS account and commit > changes directly? Well, becoming a developer requires some time. If you're simply looking to submit

Re: [gentoo-dev] /etc/profile.d/

2005-07-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 18 July 2005 02:53 am, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 22:48 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > x11-base/xorg-x11 (no idea what it's trying to do with > > /etc/profile.d/xprint*) > > Don't know, don't care, don't use xprint. Pull it from your USE flags > and all will be well.

Re: [gentoo-dev] DOWNTIME/upgrade for bugs.g.o at 2000 UTC

2005-07-18 Thread Ned Ludd
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 17:27 -0400, Kumba wrote: > For kernel bugs, is it possible to be able to do something like: > <`Pikachu> cve #CAN-2005-1912 >`Pikachu: Bug #123456; "CAN-2005-1912: Kernel infested with > Pokemon"; [Gentoo Linux :: Kernels]; {RESOLVED:PIKA!}; Wil

Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild development (vpopmail, etc.)

2005-07-18 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 17/07/2005-23:57:05(-0700): Donnie Berkholz types > On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 22:07 -0700, Anthony Gorecki wrote: > > On Sunday, July 17, 2005 9:26 pm, Casey Allen Shobe wrote: > > > I'm also a bit confused about the portdir_overlay thing - If there > > > exists a -r15, do I then add a -r16 to

Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild development (vpopmail, etc.)

2005-07-18 Thread Anthony Gorecki
On Sunday, July 17, 2005 11:57 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > In other words, something very important: You miss all the potentially > critical changes contained in the new "official" revision. Yes, that's an important, /minor/ issue that I neglected to mention. At the time, I assumed that he woul