[gentoo-dev] Unmasking of gentoolkit-0.2.1_pre3

2005-06-23 Thread Paul Varner
Unless there are objections, I am planning on unmasking gentoolkit-0.2.1_pre3 this weekend. This build of gentoolkit contains the new version of revdep-rebuild. This version has been in the tree and package masked since 12 June. During that time, I have not received any bug reports and the feedba

Re: [gentoo-dev] New AT

2005-06-23 Thread Joseph Jezak
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Homer Parker wrote: > It is with great please I announce the newest Arch Tester, and the > first non-AMD64 AT. Johannes Traub (_bambam on IRC), has become the > first PPC AT. Please give him a warm welcome to the team. > Congrats Johannes! Now

Re: [gentoo-dev] lcars gets his commit bit

2005-06-23 Thread Danny van Dyk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Grant Goodyear schrieb: > Dear all, > After quite some time "merely" being an infra dev, lcars has > finally taken the leap and gained commit access to the tree. He's > going to be officially taking over sendmail and supporting other > packages tha

Re: [gentoo-dev] lcars gets his commit bit

2005-06-23 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Thursday 23 June 2005 20:32, Grant Goodyear wrote: > After quite some time "merely" being an infra dev, lcars has > finally taken the leap and gained commit access to the tree. Ok new meat for the italian conspirancy... Oh well for Gentoo/FreeBSD I don't think I have other net-mail bugs :P -

Re: [gentoo-dev] lcars gets his commit bit

2005-06-23 Thread Andrej Kacian
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:32:53 -0500 Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear all, > After quite some time "merely" being an infra dev, lcars has > finally taken the leap and gained commit access to the tree. He's > going to be officially taking over sendmail and supporting other > packa

[gentoo-dev] lcars gets his commit bit

2005-06-23 Thread Grant Goodyear
Dear all, After quite some time "merely" being an infra dev, lcars has finally taken the leap and gained commit access to the tree. He's going to be officially taking over sendmail and supporting other packages that infra uses, so please feel free to start shoveling bugs his way! *Grin* -g2bo

[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo Documentation Licensing (CC Attribution/Share Alike)

2005-06-23 Thread Duncan
Xavier Neys posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:10:31 +0200: > The license you noticed has been hardcoded in the XSL that transforms > the glsa into the text version. It sould be updated. Thanks. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Documentation Licensing (CC Attribution/Share Alike)

2005-06-23 Thread Xavier Neys
Duncan wrote: I was just reading a GLSA on the announce list, and noticed the Creative-Commons Attribution/Share-alike license at the bottom. Why I clicked the link this time in particular I don't know, but I did... It seems the 2.0 version that Gentoo is currently using is now an older version

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Documentation Licensing (CC Attribution/Share Alike)

2005-06-23 Thread Jonathan Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Duncan wrote: > I was just reading a GLSA on the announce list, and noticed the > Creative-Commons Attribution/Share-alike license at the bottom. Why I > clicked the link this time in particular I don't know, but I did... > > It seems the 2.0 version

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Documentation Licensing (CC Attribution/Share Alike)

2005-06-23 Thread Duncan
I was just reading a GLSA on the announce list, and noticed the Creative-Commons Attribution/Share-alike license at the bottom. Why I clicked the link this time in particular I don't know, but I did... It seems the 2.0 version that Gentoo is currently using is now an older version. There's a 2.5