Alright ladies and germs^Wgentlemen, here we go, round #2 of the Mips LiveCD
attempt. This time, it works a heck of a lot better than before.
Most of theory behind this CD is made possible by Stanislaw Skowronek and his
rather revolutionary new bootloader, ARCLoad. Coming soon to a portage
On Thursday 09 June 2005 20.05, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > I still fail to see why everything done by Gentoo devs belongs on the
> > Gentoo page. The only article that belongs on the Gentoo page is the one
> > about the Enoch and how it became Gentoo.
>
> Because it's something relevant to Linux do
maillog: 09/06/2005-20:14:33(-0700): Duncan types
.. snip ..
>
>
> That said, there remains the practical issue of keeping links updated. I
> see a couple possibilities.
>
> One, there's the idea others floated -- note on the page the problem of
> keeping links updated as to why links aren
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/10/2005 08:44 AM, Duncan wrote:
> To me, that's a valid link, one that Gentoo should be proud of. In
> deleting that page, it's as if we are trying to wash away some part of our
> past, "the bad old days", that we are somehow ashamed of. To me
Donnie Berkholz posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on
Thu, 09 Jun 2005 11:05:45 -0700:
> Olivier Crete wrote:
>> I still fail to see why everything done by Gentoo devs belongs on the
>> Gentoo page. The only article that belongs on the Gentoo page is the one
>> about the Enoch and how i
On 18:59 Thu 09 Jun , Alec Warner wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> >It would still be useful to keep the titles and other info, just
> >removing the link. Otherwise, how are people supposed to even know the
> >articles exist?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Donnie
>
> I have to agree here, something
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Vermeulen wrote:
Many Gentoo developers have written articles about Linux and Gentoo on
third-party sites. The articles page [1] was originally meant to provide
links to those articles. However, it frequently occurs that
Stuart Herbert wrote: [Thu Jun 09 2005, 06:32:04PM EDT]
> > I'd like Gentoo to be a place where neat things are developed.
>
> Aren't we really a place where neat things are packaged up?
Hopefully both! :-)
Regarding the rest of your email, I don't disagree. I think that if
you read my follo
> There have been some really interesting points brought up recently
> about "where is Gentoo going?"
It feels like this topic comes up every year :)
> I have been wondering that myself.
> Some people seem to think that Gentoo has the potential to be an
> enterprise player.
Maybe, maybe not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olivier Crete wrote:
> I still fail to see why everything done by Gentoo devs belongs on the
> Gentoo page. The only article that belongs on the Gentoo page is the one
> about the Enoch and how it became Gentoo.
Because it's something relevant to Linu
On Thu, 2005-09-06 at 10:40 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 09:35:26AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> >
> >>It would still be useful to keep the titles and other info, just
> >>removing the link
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 09:35:26AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
>>It would still be useful to keep the titles and other info, just
>>removing the link. Otherwise, how are people supposed to even know the
>>articles exist?
>
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 09:34 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ferris McCormick wrote:
> >> So far as I know, sparc is fine with 6.8.99.8;
>
> OK, but this isn't the version I was asking about ... Did ya see the
> subject? =P
>
Obviously not. So
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 09:35:26AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> It would still be useful to keep the titles and other info, just
> removing the link. Otherwise, how are people supposed to even know the
> articles exist?
Google?
It's not our job to index Linux-related articles.
Wkr,
Sven
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 03:10:31PM +0200, foser wrote:
> Maintainer's arch could be ebuild/slot specific. I'm not yet convinced
> metadata is the right place.
But are you convinced the keyword order is not the right place?
In case you are, stop reading =]
In case you are not, I would argue that m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> Many Gentoo developers have written articles about Linux and Gentoo on
> third-party sites. The articles page [1] was originally meant to provide
> links to those articles. However, it frequently occurs that links change
> (most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ferris McCormick wrote:
>> So far as I know, sparc is fine with 6.8.99.8;
OK, but this isn't the version I was asking about ... Did ya see the
subject? =P
Thanks,
Donnie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCqG+NXVa
Lars Weiler posted
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Thu, 09 Jun 2005 15:37:22 +0200:
> * foser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05/06/09 15:19 +0200]:
>> The point is that with his reordering implicit information was lost for
>> no particular purpose.
>
> If you store implicit information in the key
foser wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 22:58 +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
>
>>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>Luca Barbato schrieb:
>>
>>>Stephen P. Becker wrote:
>>>
>>>
alpha++
>>>
>>>
>>>alpha++
>>>
>>
>>once again, alpha++
>
>
> It's not a vote, it's a discussion. You g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi foser,
>>>alpha++
>>once again, alpha++
> It's not a vote, it's a discussion. You guys--.
^^^Yeah, this proofs your ability to discuss very well...
> As vapier indicates he's the whole reason this ever became a problem. He
> was the one who starte
* foser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05/06/09 15:19 +0200]:
> The point is that with his reordering implicit information was lost for
> no particular purpose.
If you store implicit information in the keywords, then make
them explicit. That involves, find another way to store the
data (like in metadata),
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 10:45 +0200, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> Many Gentoo developers have written articles about Linux and Gentoo on
> third-party sites. The articles page [1] was originally meant to provide
> links to those articles. However, it frequently occurs that links change
> (most notably the
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 22:58 +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Luca Barbato schrieb:
> > Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> >
> >>alpha++
> >
> >
> > alpha++
> >
> once again, alpha++
It's not a vote, it's a discussion. You guys--.
As vapier indicates h
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 00:47 +0200, Lars Weiler wrote:
> * Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05/06/06 18:26 -0400]:
> > alpha
> > -
> > - looks nicer (subjective)
> > - easier to tell at a glance if a given keyword is in the list
>
> I'm for this. You can
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 18:43 -0400, Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote:
> The games team has been alphabetizing keywords for some time. Just an
> added datapoint.
The fact that several developers have been doing things the 'alpha way'
for no particular reason is no reason in itself to adopt this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> I'd like to remove the latest xorg revision from package.mask by the end
> of the week, so I'd appreciate testing on any ebuild regressions or
> relatively simple fixups from anyone who has a chance to try it out.
>
> If you'v
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 18:18 -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
> Ciaran would have something to say about this, along the lines of some
> packages sitting idle in ~arch state because the maintainer isn't
> really paying attention. In that case, who can really blame an arch
> team for moving ahead on their
Jim Northrup wrote:
> so if it makes a difference, I approached a dev on #gentoo-dev, and met
> with condescending and belittling treatment when i asked for voice. I
> will not be going into names or specifics.
Please specify it.
>
> undeterred, I have taken the reccomendations, and rtfm'd an
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 19:50 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'd like to remove the latest xorg revision from package.mask by the end
> of the week, so I'd appreciate testing on any ebuild regressions or
> relatively simple fixups from anyone who
Many Gentoo developers have written articles about Linux and Gentoo on
third-party sites. The articles page [1] was originally meant to provide
links to those articles. However, it frequently occurs that links change
(most notably the IBM ones).
Because it is a pain to keep these links in shape, I
On 6/9/05, Stephen P. Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Without hearing the other side of the story or seeing a transcript of
> the conversation, it is hard to say whether whoever this was reacted
> properly or not, however I would say they have a major stick up their
> ass. Don't assume everybo
31 matches
Mail list logo
