On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 10:53:03PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 07:37:07AM +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
> > I know only one mirror network who could worth the hassle: cpan.
> > Perl has a nice geographically distributed network of mirrors. Too bad
> > portage can't automati
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 07:37:07AM +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
> I know only one mirror network who could worth the hassle: cpan.
> Perl has a nice geographically distributed network of mirrors. Too bad
> portage can't automatically select the closest cpan mirror. :(
You can already put in specific m
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:01:05PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 5 May 2005 03:48:49 -0500 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | > Ok, here's the main issue. Simply changing prefix isn't enough to
> | > automatically make every package in the tree work. A heck of a lot
> | > of t
Corey Shields wrote:
>At one point in time someone suggested that we may as well utilize other
>people's mirror networks that are already out there, rather than our own.
>This then got implemented for stuff like sourceforge packages.
>
>Unfortunately this plays hell for lots of people. If you
R Hill posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Thu, 05
May 2005 21:00:47 -0600:
> Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
>> emerge gnome-2.8.3-r1.ebuild digest
>
> s/emerge/ebuild
Well, as long as we're correcting things...
s/ebuild/ebuild\//
(The closing delimiter was missing.)
=8^)
--
Duncan -
Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
emerge gnome-2.8.3-r1.ebuild digest
s/emerge/ebuild
;)
--de.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Dulmandakh Sukhbaatar posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
excerpted below, on Fri, 06 May 2005 10:31:19 +0900:
> I have Gnome installed Gentoo 2005.0, recently newer version of gnome
> marked as stable, so available to update. I don't need epiphany and
> gnome games, formerly I could just edit .ebuild fi
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 10:31 +0900, Dulmandakh Sukhbaatar wrote:
> I have Gnome installed Gentoo 2005.0, recently newer version of gnome
> marked as stable, so available to update. I don't need epiphany and
> gnome games, formerly I could just edit .ebuild file and remove lines,
> but at this time i
Donnie Berkholz posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on
Thu, 05 May 2005 08:20:16 -0700:
> We already know about it and are working on it, so there's no need to
> file a bug from our perspective, unless you've got patches to post on it.
OK, what I needed to know. Unfortunately, patches
I have Gnome installed Gentoo 2005.0, recently newer version of gnome
marked as stable, so available to update. I don't need epiphany and
gnome games, formerly I could just edit .ebuild file and remove lines,
but at this time it shows me:
Calculating world dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge (1 of 6)
Corey Shields wrote:
> On Thursday 05 May 2005 03:06 pm, Lance Albertson wrote:
>
>>We could make a couple of bugs for each category and get those folks to
>>fixing them. But then that would require a lot of work and I know we're all
>>just a bunch of lazy bums anyways ;)
>
>
> I smell a new dev
On Thursday 05 May 2005 03:06 pm, Lance Albertson wrote:
> We could make a couple of bugs for each category and get those folks to
> fixing them. But then that would require a lot of work and I know we're all
> just a bunch of lazy bums anyways ;)
I smell a new dev requirement.. "Fix 10 nomirror
Mike Frysinger wrote:
[snip]
>>RESTRICT=[no]mirror
>>---
>>- Files too large for the mirrors? (What is the size limit?)
>
>
> yes ...
We should probably have a hard definition for this or expectations to the rule
too. Let me look through our current distfiles and see how big we
On Thursday 05 May 2005 05:04 pm, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> RESTRICT=[no]fetch
> --
> Should be used if the license prohibits unattended/automated download
> (eg click-through licenses), or the upstream author wants all downloads
> to be manually done from their site (I know of at l
On Thursday 05 May 2005 02:04 pm, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Unless there is something I've missed, why do we have ebuilds with
> RESTRICT=nomirror, having a GPL-2 license, and distributed via
> sourceforge? Wouldn't RESTRICT=primaryuri be much better? Most fetches
> would go to SF first, and we'd s
On Thu, 5 May 2005 14:04:20 -0700 "Robin H. Johnson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I've tried to dig through our policy documents, to find the policy
| regarding RESTRICT=mirror/fetch. I don't find anything in the htdocs
| tree from CVS, beyond a few brief mentions in the handbook.
Some of it's in
Hi,
I've tried to dig through our policy documents, to find the policy
regarding RESTRICT=mirror/fetch. I don't find anything in the htdocs
tree from CVS, beyond a few brief mentions in the handbook.
RESTRICT=[no]fetch
--
Should be used if the license prohibits unattended/automate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello All,
I am retiring the Netra that we have been using for development. I have
a better box that we are now using.
Most people who had access to the Netra were not actually using it. Thus, I am
not going to just copy the users over. Any developer
On Wed, 04 May 2005 08:34:34 +0100
John Mylchreest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought about this, but not wanting to depend on gentoolkit
> makes using equery for example a little awkward.
> This, I'm sure isn't fully feature-rich yet - and something
> like this will be the next addition to go
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
> Umm... does that mean file the (gcc4+amd64+xorg) bugs, and he'll work with
> them, or don't file them, because it's already got known issues that need
> fixed before bug reports on that particular combo will be anything but
> additional
On Thu, 5 May 2005 03:28:06 +0200 Michiel de Bruijne
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Thursday 05 May 2005 01:14, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > For us to support LSB:
| >
| > * We'd have to use RPM instead of portage
|
| That's not correct, quote from LSB:
| "The distribution itself may use a differen
On Thu, 5 May 2005 03:48:49 -0500 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| > Ok, here's the main issue. Simply changing prefix isn't enough to
| > automatically make every package in the tree work. A heck of a lot
| > of them will need manual modification, and there's no easy way to
| > figure ou
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 09:14 +, Casey Allen Shobe - SeattleServer
Mailing Lists wrote:
> But I would like to know if the ebuild could be maintained or how else a
> multilog-based system could be created?
Probably filing a bug with a new ebuild is the best route to get it
updated.
--
Chris Gi
Hi all.
Just a quick reminder that saturday holds the monthly Bugday event.
Interested people should join the #gentoo-bugs channel on
irc.freenode.net and might also wish to take a peek at
http://bugday.gentoo.org :)
Regards,
Bryan Ãstergaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing l
Donnie Berkholz posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on
Wed, 04 May 2005 12:03:29 -0700:
> mjc is working on gcc4+amd64+xorg. It seems to work fine on x86.
Cool! =8^)
Umm... does that mean file the (gcc4+amd64+xorg) bugs, and he'll work with
them, or don't file them, because it's alread
On Thursday 05 May 2005 09:14, Casey Allen Shobe - SeattleServer Mailing Lists
wrote:
> So, I typed in "emerge gluelog" and realized quickly that this package is
> not maintained and should probably be masked, as it creates /etc/rc.d, and
> puts init scripts in /etc/rc.d/init.d, which does not exi
I was browsing about the web when I stumbed across this:
http://64.233.179.104/search?q=cache:QHsFgaiiddIJ:www.geocrawler.com/mail/msg.php3%3Fmsg_id%3D5589243+dcron+multilog&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
...which seems to hint that in Gentoo's younger days, a supported logging
configuration was supported using
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:48:49AM -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> default being use or use/local or whatever the hell
Wow.
no more posting at 3:50 am...
meant usr for above, pardon.
~brian
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 03:12:20PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 2 May 2005 19:02:29 -0500 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | State said problem for the general community. Guessing you're
> | referencing the issue/request that being able to manage home, and
> | 'global' ins
29 matches
Mail list logo
