Mike Frysinger wrote:
> as a reminder, NEVER utilize USE=pic in your package unless you know
> exactly what it's for and you're sure you need it
I figured this use flag should be used to ensure libraries are built as PIC
(i.e. conform to the relevant ABI). This is a common problem on the media
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Blue all,
Please welcome Flameeyes, Diego Pettenò, from italy to the team.
He's been a busy boy in the linux world so i'll let him talk for
himself here:
"I'm a KDE (extragear) devel so I know how to handle KDE-related
stuff such as installation pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yellow all,
Last week i've added vgarg to the Java team, He's from india but lives
in the US. (bad choice imho :-) ).
He's a yoga-meditating Java monkey what seems to me an excellent mix.
I'm sure some off u guys/gals will suck this up by stating t
Hi everybody,
As some of you may already know Nicholas Jones (carpaski), the portage
lead till now, stepped down of that job recently for various reasons.
This mail is intended to let people know how things will be handled in
the future in portage-land.
First, there will be no single replacement
On Sunday 17 April 2005 08:07 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> Now what? I'm going to ask here what to do with this. I think the right way
> should be adding v4l to base/use.mask and then -v4l on
> default-linux/use.mask, as it's strictly-linux thing.
this probably falls along side the USE r
Hi,
I don't remember why I started looking at avifile this night, but while I was
at it, I found something which uncovers a bit of troubles with v4l useflag.
Summarizing:
v4l useflag enables Video4Linux support (usually webcams and tv cards) on many
multimedia softwares (like avifile, but not o
Okay, thanks to testing the patch has been improved to a point where it
works for everyone, on integrated video, PCI and AGP cards. It is now
unmasked.
~x86 and ~amd64 can have fun with this.
Could the early adopters please make sure they remerge the package so
they have the latest patch.
Thanks,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 17 April 2005 09:50 am, Philipp Hasse wrote:
>
>>This way it can be used to set the -mcpu and -mtune flags correctly.
>
>
> not worth the added crap imho
> -mike
Better to have it fail and have the users fix their
On Sunday 17 April 2005 09:50 am, Philipp Hasse wrote:
> This way it can be used to set the -mcpu and -mtune flags correctly.
not worth the added crap imho
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 12:33 +0100, Tony Vroon wrote:
> The code in question has been replaced with a sysfs tree-walker that
> should find the AGP video card in any system. If anyone out there has a
> PCI-Express adapter, I'd like to know if this code finds it or not.
Alright, I found the regressio
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 19:18:46 +
Alex Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You German developers ... Someone has to stop you, and that project
> falls to the British! :D
Oh no, not again!
--
Rgds
Peter Humphrey
Linux Counter 5290, Aug 93.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Works here without problem
On Sun, 2005-17-04 at 12:33 +0100, Tony Vroon wrote:
> Could any xchat-xsys users that are not afraid of using an experimental
> patch unmask version 1.9.3 with /etc/portage/package.unmask and see if
> the /video output gives you the right information.
> If I get 10 repo
On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 12:33 +0100, Tony Vroon wrote:
> Could any xchat-xsys users that are not afraid of using an experimental
> patch unmask version 1.9.3 with /etc/portage/package.unmask and see if
> the /video output gives you the right information.
> If I get 10 reports that it works, I'll unma
Jason Wever wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Reply-to-All is evil. You should be using Reply-to-List. I know that I
sure don't need to get the same email both on and off-list. Off-list
emails should be reserved only for when you ex
On Sunday 17 April 2005 03:03 CET Daniel Drake wrote:
> Robert Paskowitz wrote:
>[...]
> > Having portage take your own tree from a particular user's
> > home directory on the other hand seems like a bit of a stretch, and no
> > necessarily all that useful.
>
> I would find this useful, but perhaps
Jeffrey Forman posted
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below,
on Sat, 16 Apr 2005 11:26:45 -0400:
> On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 16:17 +0100, Tom Martin wrote:
>> Herbie is proficient in C and Bash, and has made a number of patches for
>> various projects already. He's from Essex, England, and he's finish
Hi,
I recently noticed that portage executes the file bashrc located in
/etc/portage before every ebuild.
This way it can be used to set the -mcpu and -mtune flags correctly.
If you add the following to this file everything goes automatically:
<--- SNIP --->
# Automatically replace -mtune= with -
Could any xchat-xsys users that are not afraid of using an experimental
patch unmask version 1.9.3 with /etc/portage/package.unmask and see if
the /video output gives you the right information.
If I get 10 reports that it works, I'll unmask it and unleash it on ~x86
and ~amd64.
(Any other arches wi
18 matches
Mail list logo
