On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 03:33:46 +0200 Christian Parpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Finally, just don't use svn if you feel that uncomfortable with it. No
| one said that cvs will go away. I'm tired of reading your 'svn is
| hard to merge because it *is* hard to merge' posts :(
Eh? Dude, I'm one o
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 19:37 +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Harald,
>
> Welcome aboard!
> > The name's van DÄk, without a C!
> Nono, you're mistaken. It's "van Dyk" :-P
Nonono, we can only handle one!! ;)
--
Homer Parker
Gentoo/AMD64
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 8:57 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 20:50:36 +0200 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> | On Monday 11 April 2005 22:42, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> | > Well, surprisingly enough, one of the main reasons we use these
> | > version control things is
Harald van DÄk wrote:
>
> Yep, that's UTF8. Just spell it van Dijk if you have problems with Ä; I
> have to most of the time anyway :)
>
Welcome, keep in mind that nano won't like utf8 (so spyderous will hate
you) yet and I have no clue how to type Ä so you'll be truedfx or Harald
but not expect
> I doubt this is the right place to ask, but I got no
> reply from the trustees, so...
Just out of curiousity... When did you ask the trustees,
and to whom/where did you post the question?
I have no emails from you in my mboxes.
--NJ
pgp45ypCvXLsQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:10:25PM -0400, Daniel Ostrow wrote:
> Take a look at dev-libs/glib/files/glib-2.6.3-testglib-ssp.patch to see
> how solar and I dealt with a similar issue with tests and ssp. See if
> you can adapt it, we just forced -fno-stack-protector after the CFLAGS
> pulled in from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
Actually not as for example an index.html could override my index.php. Even
worse, the index html file does not need to be called index.html either but
the name might be configured in either the apache config f
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 02:20 pm, Maurice van der Pot wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 01:52:05PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 12 April 2005 11:59 am, Maurice van der Pot wrote:
> > > I have the following situation:
> > > - a package (valgrind) that can be compiled with PIE and uses
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 20:50:36 +0200 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| On Monday 11 April 2005 22:42, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > Well, surprisingly enough, one of the main reasons we use these
| > version control things is so that we can see *what changed*. It's a
| > hell of a lot easier t
On Monday 11 April 2005 22:42, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Well, surprisingly enough, one of the main reasons we use these version
> control things is so that we can see *what changed*. It's a hell of a
> lot easier to do this when you can just say "show me everything that
> changed in the foo project
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 20:28:05 +0200 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| On Monday 11 April 2005 20:07, Jason Wever wrote:
| > That could be handled via some CONFIG_PROTECT foo (unless someone
| > has a more suitable method in mind)
|
| Actually not as for example an index.html could overrid
Maurice van der Pot wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:32:58PM +0200, Harald van DÄk wrote:
>
>>Jochen Maes wrote:
>>
>>>Ok we have a new labrat in the team, his name is Harald van Dijck and
>>>nick is truedfx.
>>
>>The name's van DÄk, without a C!
>
>
> Van what? Is that UTF8? Oh, I see, my fo
On Sunday 10 April 2005 18:39, Aaron Walker wrote:
> Regarding GLEP 36[1], solar has asked me to try and figure out a way to
> provide both CVS and Subversion for one repository and keep them sync'd
> somehow.
>
> Although this was not the intention of my glep, it would be nice to get
> this implem
On Monday 11 April 2005 20:07, Jason Wever wrote:
> That could be handled via some CONFIG_PROTECT foo (unless someone has a
> more suitable method in mind)
Actually not as for example an index.html could override my index.php. Even
worse, the index html file does not need to be called index.html
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 01:52:05PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 April 2005 11:59 am, Maurice van der Pot wrote:
> > I have the following situation:
> > - a package (valgrind) that can be compiled with PIE and uses PIE
> > for some purpose or other if it is supported
> > - tests (m
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:32:58PM +0200, Harald van DÄk wrote:
> Jochen Maes wrote:
> > Ok we have a new labrat in the team, his name is Harald van Dijck and
> > nick is truedfx.
>
> The name's van DÄk, without a C!
Van what? Is that UTF8? Oh, I see, my font just sucks.
> Hi all.
Welcome fello
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 11:59 am, Maurice van der Pot wrote:
> I have the following situation:
> - a package (valgrind) that can be compiled with PIE and uses PIE
> for some purpose or other if it is supported
> - tests (make check) that cannot be compiled with PIE
allowing user specified tests
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Harald,
Welcome aboard!
> The name's van DÄk, without a C!
Nono, you're mistaken. It's "van Dyk" :-P
Danny
- --
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 17:59 +0200, Maurice van der Pot wrote:
*snip*
> If compiled with the hardened gcc profile, -fno-pie has to be specified
> when compiling the tests or it will fail. Specifying -fno-pie always
> will force me to disable any PIE support through configure as well.
>
> I tried to
I have the following situation:
- a package (valgrind) that can be compiled with PIE and uses PIE
for some purpose or other if it is supported
- tests (make check) that cannot be compiled with PIE
In the upstream release CFLAGS is reset to "-Wno-long-long", but I would
prefer to allow customised
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 23:42, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 23:19:02 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> | Care to fight it out?
>
> What's wrong with 75936?
BTW, my intention in bringing it to the list was so that the requirements
could all be hashed out and a so
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 23:42, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 23:19:02 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> | Care to fight it out?
>
> What's wrong with 75936?
Nothing wrong with it. It was just has a lower number and I was going through
the bugs high to low for a c
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 23:19:02 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Care to fight it out?
What's wrong with 75936?
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, shell tools)
Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
pgpwQVd7TreFO.
Care to fight it out?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hey all,
With the recent mails about trustee elections coming up I thought I'd give you
guys an official status of why the trustee mailing list hasn't been updated on
archives.gentoo.org. Its not a conspiracy as some of you may think infra pwns
you all ;)
We've been in the process of getting our
Jochen Maes wrote:
> Ok we have a new labrat in the team, his name is Harald van Dijck and
> nick is truedfx.
The name's van DÄk, without a C!
Hi all.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 14:22 +0200, Jochen Maes wrote:
> Btw he has no social life at all, and has only his little brother and
> Gentoo to live for. He did say something about genone and their mutual
> perl love been shown like the way jforman used to show to his goats
> (and now to his llamas). But
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
chaps and gals,
I'm a tad late, but things seem to be b0rked out every day here :-).
Perhaps i should stop drinking alcohol from the minute i wake up :-).
Ok we have a new labrat in the team, his name is Harald van Dijck and
nick is truedfx.
He's
28 matches
Mail list logo
