Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.1.903 -- /usr/X11R6 -> /usr: SPARC testing

2005-02-03 Thread Ferris McCormick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Donnie Berkholz wrote: --[PinePGP]--[begin]-- Ferris McCormick wrote: 1. (Previously noted) A couple font directories (cyrillic, ukr) were never made into symbolic links before, and rig

Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.1.903 -- /usr/X11R6 -> /usr: SPARC testing

2005-02-02 Thread Thomas de Grenier de Latour
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 12:19:01 -0800 Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Try this patch. > Here it worked as expected. No more /usr/include/GL/GL or /usr/include/X11/X11 symlinks, and the headers in /usr/include/GL are installed just fine. -- TGL. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing li

Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.1.903 -- /usr/X11R6 -> /usr: SPARC testing

2005-02-02 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ferris McCormick wrote: | 1. (Previously noted) A couple font directories (cyrillic, ukr) were |never made into symbolic links before, and right now they must be |removed by hand; | 2. (Previously noted) A couple orphan symbolic links: |a. /

Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.1.903 -- /usr/X11R6 -> /usr: SPARC testing

2005-02-02 Thread Thomas de Grenier de Latour
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 18:11:37 + (UTC) Ferris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2. (Previously noted) A couple orphan symbolic links: > a. /usr/include/X11/X11 --> ../X11R6/include/X11 > b. /usr/include/GL/GL --> ../X11R6/include/GL I can see this two ones too (on a ~x86 system, u

Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.1.903 -- /usr/X11R6 -> /usr: SPARC testing

2005-02-02 Thread Ferris McCormick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Donnie Berkholz wrote: --[PinePGP]--[begin]-- Donnie Berkholz wrote: I just committed it with KEYWORDS="-*" because I need some brave testers. I already tested every possibility of whic

Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.1.903 -- /usr/X11R6 -> /usr

2005-02-02 Thread Roman Gaufman
Well, apart from that reported problem, compiles and works just fine so far (I removed fle manually though, not tested your patch). Will report if there's any further problems. Thanks! Roman On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 14:20:57 -0800, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MES

Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.1.903 -- /usr/X11R6 -> /usr

2005-02-01 Thread Peter Gordon
I'm compiling it now (full ~x86 system). I'll let you know how it goes in about two hours. Then again, I may be asleep by then, so let's hope this world upgrade (including the 20050131 GCC 4.0.0 alpha snapshot just for kicks) doesn't damage my system too much while I'm asleep. =) -- gentoo-dev@

Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.1.903 -- /usr/X11R6 -> /usr

2005-02-01 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Gregorio Guidi wrote: (seriously, though, there was even a bit of discussion in the freedesktop mailing lists about the possibility to have multiple X installed, but I guess that FHS compliance kills this possibility, or at least an easy implementation of it.) You're free to install multiple X v

Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.1.903 -- /usr/X11R6 -> /usr

2005-02-01 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Roman Gaufman wrote: * //usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/fonts.cache-1 not a symlink, moving to /usr/share/fonts !!! ERROR: x11-base/xorg-x11-6.8.1.903 failed. !!! Function remove_font_dirs, Line 1666, Exitcode 1 !!! /usr/share/fonts/fonts.cache-1 exists. Remove it and try again. !!! If you need support,

Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.1.903 -- /usr/X11R6 -> /usr

2005-02-01 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 01/02/2005-14:20:57(-0800): Donnie Berkholz types > I just committed it with KEYWORDS="-*" because I need some brave > testers. I already tested every possibility of which I could think of > version changes resulting in an upgrade to 6.8.1.903 and things seem to > be working fine now. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.1.903 -- /usr/X11R6 -> /usr

2005-02-01 Thread Roman Gaufman
Hmm, any ideas about the following? removed `//usr/share/fonts/Type1/encodings.dir' removed `//usr/share/fonts/75dpi/encodings.dir' removed `//usr/share/fonts/100dpi/encodings.dir' * Removing //usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi symlink removed `//usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi' * Removing //usr/X11

Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.1.903 -- /usr/X11R6 -> /usr

2005-02-01 Thread Caleb Tennis
Mike Frysinger wrote: three cheers for donnie i say ! now if only KDE/QT would take the hint ... ;) -mike I'm please to report that the Qt4 ebuild is FHS compliant. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.1.903 -- /usr/X11R6 -> /usr

2005-02-01 Thread Gregorio Guidi
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 00:08, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 01 February 2005 06:05 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > We're eliminating a historical FHS exception for /usr/X11R6. > > three cheers for donnie i say ! > > now if only KDE/QT would take the hint ... ;) > -mike ...if only the FH

Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.1.903 -- /usr/X11R6 -> /usr

2005-02-01 Thread Roman Gaufman
Great work. Emerging now. On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 15:05:52 -0800, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > | I just committed it with KEYWORDS="-*" because I need some brave > | testers. I already tested every possibilit

Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.1.903 -- /usr/X11R6 -> /usr

2005-02-01 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 01 February 2005 06:05 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > We're eliminating a historical FHS exception for /usr/X11R6. three cheers for donnie i say ! now if only KDE/QT would take the hint ... ;) -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.1.903 -- /usr/X11R6 -> /usr

2005-02-01 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: | I just committed it with KEYWORDS="-*" because I need some brave | testers. I already tested every possibility of which I could think of | version changes resulting in an upgrade to 6.8.1.903 and things seem to | be working fine

[gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.1.903 -- /usr/X11R6 -> /usr

2005-02-01 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I just committed it with KEYWORDS="-*" because I need some brave testers. I already tested every possibility of which I could think of version changes resulting in an upgrade to 6.8.1.903 and things seem to be working fine now. The most significant chan