2007/8/29, Lorenzo Milesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> seems ok now:
> # hdparm -i /dev/sda
yep it looks ok now try also a hdparm -i /dev/sr0 to see if also the dvd
has ata enabled
> > after that, the disk's spin may be due to the high load (thw swap
> filling -
> > try setting the swap t
Hello,
This post is not specially amd64 specific but as some last post where also on
the i810 subject, i hope you could help me.
I own a gigabyte motherboard ( G33-DS3 ) with intel G33 chipset and i 'm
unable to made drm working. The problem is (as far as i have understood it)
that due to havi
Duncan wrote:
> Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> excerpted below, on Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:18:57 -0400:
>
>> Also, when compiling X.org/mesa/drm from source, it builds the kernel
>> modules drm.ko and i915.ko. What package does that in gentoo?
>
> That's the kernel, AFAIK. U
On 8/16/07, Beso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> did you removed all the hda stack (you should then use the /dev/sda instead
> of /dev/hda for hd ad /dev/sr0 instead of /dev/hdb for the dvd)?
sda doesn't accept dma from hdparm.
> with the new pata stack hdparm doesn't really function anymore.
here
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Humphrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 4:50 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Disk boot order in grub
On Tuesday 28 Aug 2007, Drake Donahue wrote:
You have selected:
first page; sata first disk to boot from;
second pag
Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:18:57 -0400:
> Also, when compiling X.org/mesa/drm from source, it builds the kernel
> modules drm.ko and i915.ko. What package does that in gentoo?
That's the kernel, AFAIK. Under Device Drivers > Char
Peter Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 29 Aug
2007 09:50:03 +0100:
> That's a bit sophisticated if so, and I'm a bit wary of some of the
> logic design decisions here. Wouldn't it be good if BIOS makers told us
> how their systems operate? I never th
Marc Joliet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:54:35 +0200:
> Sorry for taking so long for a response. First I was cleaning up my
> world file[1] on Sunday/Monday (inspired by a recent thread here). Then
> I couldn't boot[2] _AND_ lastly had had
Hi, Jason.
Try to run:
revdep-rebuild
> All,
> I'd like to unmask xf86-video-i810 to grab v2.1.1, however, when I do,
> my compiz-fusion/kde setup gets borked. (I have to resize terminals to
> get the screen to update, etc)
> Is there a handy way to determine what needs to be re-merged/unmaske
"Wil Reichert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Wed, 29 Aug 2007 07:49:23 -0400:
> I often have long running cpu-intensive tasks running on my dual core
> machines. Will maintaining cpu / core affinity result in noticeably
> better performance? Or was that answe
All,
I'd like to unmask xf86-video-i810 to grab v2.1.1, however, when I do,
my compiz-fusion/kde setup gets borked. (I have to resize terminals to
get the screen to update, etc)
Is there a handy way to determine what needs to be re-merged/unmasked
after upgrading xf86-video-i810? I'd prefer to
lol that worked great, turns out i have a /samba directory and thats were it
all was XD thanks all for the help!
On 8/28/07, Bernhard Auzinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am Dienstag 28 August 2007 schrieb Daemon Xavier:
> > my emerge is giving me the error saying my root partition is full, so
On 8/28/07, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some weeks ago, there was a thread mentioning taskset, then part of
> schedutils. Someone mentioned that schedutils was being merged into
> util-linux, but the then-current util-linux versions (thru 2.12.x) in the
> tree didn't have it.
>
> Well, uti
Sorry for taking so long for a response. First I was cleaning up my
world file[1] on Sunday/Monday (inspired by a recent thread here). Then
I couldn't boot[2] _AND_ lastly had had some really weird networking
problems[3]. Hot damn!
Am Samstag, den 25.08.2007, 23:53 + schrieb Duncan:
> Marc Jo
On Tuesday 28 Aug 2007, Drake Donahue wrote:
> You have selected:
> first page; sata first disk to boot from;
> second page; disk order 'raid sata 1', 'raid sata 2', 'old sata', ide; ?
Correct.
> Currently, after a boot/reboot to BIOS setup, does the third page still
> show the hard disk is 'ra
15 matches
Mail list logo
