Steve Herber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skribis:
> I want to use ebuilds, versus tar, so I can easily remove the
> package when I am done with it.
Most autobuild/automake packages these days have a working 'make
uninstall' that does what you want.
--
Barry.SCHWARTZ at chemoelectric.org http://www.ch
I want to use ebuilds, versus tar, so I can easily remove the package when
I am done with it.
Your wizard script would be version 0.1 of the script I want to end up with.
Thanks,
Steve Herber[EMAIL PROTECTED] work: 206-221-7262
Security Engineer, UW Medicine, IT Services
/usr/portage/skel.ebuild - Thanks for the pointer.
Steve Herber[EMAIL PROTECTED] work: 206-221-7262
Security Engineer, UW Medicine, IT Services home: 425-454-2399
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, Richard Fish wrote:
On 4/29/06, Steve Herber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This simply
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, April 30, 2006 9:51 pm, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>
> Why not just use a more specific atom, one which includes a parital for
> full version like:
> '~gcc-4.0.1'
>
Actually, I wouldn't mind such a script. I have a ton of entries in my
pac
On Sunday 30 April 2006 14:53, Robert Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-amd64] installed packages':
> whenever a needed ~amd64 package turns to stable, i want
> that script to remove the entry from package.keywords.
Why not just use a more specific atom, one which includes a parital
Richard Fish posted
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Sun, 30 Apr 2006 10:28:23 -0700:
> What would be the difference between having a script to create an
> ebuild, vs a simple template ebuild to start from? The
> /usr/portage/skel.ebuild is all of 17 lines when you ignore comments
> and
hi everybody
are all emerged packages noticed under /var/db/pkg?
is there another place where portage stores information about installed
packages?
the reason i'm asking is that i want to write a python script that compares the
new/already emerged packages
(after an "emerge ... world") against /
On 4/29/06, Steve Herber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This simply couldn't be automated in a sane manner. There's too much
Sane? A crude script that can create an ebuild with just
the minimum fields may not work very often, but if it works
for the package YOU want, then
On 4/30/06, Christian Limberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mark Knecht schrieb:
> Hi,
> My Gentoo AMD64 machine is the only machine in the house with a
> video card capable of running a Windows game my teenage kid got for
> his birthday. I checked Cedega and unfortunately they don't support it
>
Mark Knecht schrieb:
Hi,
My Gentoo AMD64 machine is the only machine in the house with a
video card capable of running a Windows game my teenage kid got for
his birthday. I checked Cedega and unfortunately they don't support it
yet. This has raised the spectre of possibly adding Windows to this
Hi Mark,
>I assume that the Windows install would wipe out grub. Would I just
> reinstall grub from a Gentoo install CD to get it back and then modify
> my grub config file to set up the dual boot? Any grub/Windows issues
> having Windows at the end of the drive sitting in an extended
> partit
I assume that the Windows install would wipe out grub. Would I just
reinstall grub from a Gentoo install CD to get it back and then modify
my grub config file to set up the dual boot? Any grub/Windows issues
having Windows at the end of the drive sitting in an extended
partition?
I don't have
On Saturday 29 April 2006 17:32, Mark Knecht wrote:
>I assume that the Windows install would wipe out grub. Would I just
> reinstall grub from a Gentoo install CD to get it back and then modify
> my grub config file to set up the dual boot? Any grub/Windows issues
> having Windows at the end o
13 matches
Mail list logo
