felix posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on
Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:48:37 -0800:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 04:14:03PM -0500, Mark Haney wrote:
>> What's the best way to update config files? I am a big fan of RH's
>> method of dealing with them, and can't stand the way Debian does it, so
Richard Fish wrote:
On 1/9/06, Michael Ulm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When I do an emerge --update --deep world the
packages hal and dbus get downgraded to versions
hal-0.4.8 and dbus-0.23.4-r1 only to be upgraded to
the newest versions in the same update. When I just
do the update without the
On Monday 09 January 2006 23:54, Richard Fish wrote:
> Why? Just copy-n-paste the relevant lines from
> /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask.
Because I prefer to specify the version of the package to unmask.
Ciao
Francesco
--
Linux Version 2.6.15-gentoo, Compiled #1 PREEMPT Wed Jan 4 20:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 04:14:03PM -0500, Mark Haney wrote:
> What's the best way to update config files? I am a big fan of RH's
> method of dealing with them, and can't stand the way Debian does it, so
> how do the majority of Gentoo users manage their config files?
Don't know how RedHat or De
On 1/9/06, Peter Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why is HTTP traffic going the wrong way? It's taking the default route
> instead of the specific one it should know about. Bizarrely, Win XP on the
> same box has no trouble so I know the hardware is fine.
Do you by chance have any firewallin
On 1/9/06, Sebastian Redl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Francesco Talamona wrote:
>
> >I also made a little script to help unmask all the packages needed,
> >anyway it is a process quite tedious :-)
> >
> >
> Care to share? It is indeed quite tedious.
Why? Just copy-n-paste the relevant lines from
If you don't want to use the modular version, you can always use this overlay:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-396898-start-0.html
I prefer not to use the modular version until it gets unmasked (or at least
not hardmasked)
hope it helps!
Chema
El Lunes, 9 de Enero de 2006 23:30, Francesco
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:23:11PM +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> No, it's just a WAP. I already have a network with a broadband link. AFAICS
> the WAP doesn't have a firewall, but certainly nothing's passing through it.
Ah, I missed the last line that said it all works fine in that other
virO
On Monday 09 January 2006 22:09, Sebastian Redl wrote:
> Francesco Talamona wrote:
> >I also made a little script to help unmask all the packages needed,
> >anyway it is a process quite tedious :-)
>
> Care to share? It is indeed quite tedious.
#!/bin/bash
echo -e "=$1\t\t\t~amd64\n" >> /etc/porta
Brett Johnson wrote:
Is the netgear device a WAP only or are you using a broadband router
with wireless access? If it's the latter, and you connect the "WAN"
interface of the netgear to eth1, than you are hitting the firewall of
the netgear. If this is the case, then just connect eth1 to one of
Mark Haney wrote:
Nuitari wrote:
What's the best way to update config files? I am a big fan of RH's
method of dealing with them, and can't stand the way Debian does it,
so how do the majority of Gentoo users manage their config files?
with etc-update
I know that, but is there a 'bet p
Nuitari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skribis:
> >What's the best way to update config files? I am a big fan of RH's method
> >of dealing with them, and can't stand the way
> >Debian does it, so how do the majority of Gentoo users manage their config
> >files?
>
> with etc-update
I'm using cfg-update (
I'm partial to the dispatch-conf method in conjunction with rcs and
colordiff. Here are some links:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_dispatch-conf
http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_Colorized_Config_Management
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 04:14:03PM -0500, Mark Haney wrote:
> What's the best way to update config f
Nuitari wrote:
What's the best way to update config files? I am a big fan of RH's
method of dealing with them, and can't stand the way Debian does it,
so how do the majority of Gentoo users manage their config files?
with etc-update
I know that, but is there a 'bet practices' to use wi
What's the best way to update config files? I am a big fan of RH's method of
dealing with them, and can't stand the way Debian does it, so how do the
majority of Gentoo users manage their config files?
with etc-update
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
What's the best way to update config files? I am a big fan of RH's
method of dealing with them, and can't stand the way Debian does it, so
how do the majority of Gentoo users manage their config files?
--
Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org m
Francesco Talamona wrote:
I also made a little script to help unmask all the packages needed,
anyway it is a process quite tedious :-)
Care to share? It is indeed quite tedious.
Sebastian Redl
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
On Monday 09 January 2006 14:28, Hamie wrote:
> is there a timetable for 7.0 (The reaosn I ask is so I can get the
> r300 support working, which was fine on the CVS version I was
> running, but I'd like to update...
It is already useable, I made (ehm, copied) an ebuild for x11-7.0 in
virtual/x11
Hello,
On Monday 09 January 2006 14:28, Hamie wrote:
> WOuld it be impolite of me to ask if XOrg 6.9 is ever going to be
> available for amd64? I see that 7.0 (Modularised) version is hard
> masked, but it doesn't compile anyway when I unmask it (XServer
> fails to copmile. I think I've seen it me
On 1/9/06, Michael Ulm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I do an emerge --update --deep world the
> packages hal and dbus get downgraded to versions
> hal-0.4.8 and dbus-0.23.4-r1 only to be upgraded to
> the newest versions in the same update. When I just
> do the update without the --deep option
On 1/9/06, Hamie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> WOuld it be impolite of me to ask if XOrg 6.9 is ever going to be
> available for amd64? I see that 7.0 (Modularised) version is hard
> masked, but it doesn't compile anyway when I unmask it (XServer
> fails to copmile. I think I've seen it mentioned he
I recently tried using the 2005.1 installer on an Athlon 3200 Venice
running on a GIGABYTE GA-K8N51PVMT-9, which has an Nvidia 430 chipset (I
believe it is referred to as either C51 or MCP51 in the kernel).
I ran into two problems.
1) The boot process hangs on loading the sata_nv module. Using
>
> (netgear is the WAP and spirit is a laptop the other side of it.)
Is the netgear device a WAP only or are you using a broadband router
with wireless access? If it's the latter, and you connect the "WAN"
interface of the netgear to eth1, than you are hitting the firewall of
the netgear. If thi
WOuld it be impolite of me to ask if XOrg 6.9 is ever going to be
available for amd64? I see that 7.0 (Modularised) version is hard
masked, but it doesn't compile anyway when I unmask it (XServer
fails to copmile. I think I've seen it mentioned here before), but
6.9 doesn't appear to be avail at
This may not be amd64-specific, in which case I apologise, but I'm having
problems commissioning a wireless network. I've connected a wireless access
point to a second NIC on this box and given them both new network addresses.
Both eth0 and eth1 are up and I can ping the WAP, but I cannot connec
2006/1/9, Daiajo Tibdixious <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 1/9/06, Daiajo Tibdixious <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> On 1/9/06, Harm Geerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > On Monday 09 January 2006 10:51, Daiajo Tibdixious wrote:
> > > # emerge --ask --verbose gcc> > >> > > These are the packages that I would m
On Monday 09 January 2006 13:26, Daiajo Tibdixious wrote:
> On 1/9/06, Daiajo Tibdixious <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 1/9/06, Harm Geerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Monday 09 January 2006 10:51, Daiajo Tibdixious wrote:
> > > > # emerge --ask --verbose gcc
> > > >
> > > > These are th
On 1/9/06, Daiajo Tibdixious <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/9/06, Harm Geerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 09 January 2006 10:51, Daiajo Tibdixious wrote:
> > > # emerge --ask --verbose gcc
> > >
> > > These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
> > >
> > > Calculating depen
On 1/9/06, Harm Geerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 09 January 2006 10:51, Daiajo Tibdixious wrote:
> > # emerge --ask --verbose gcc
> >
> > These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
> >
> > Calculating dependencies ...done!
> > [ebuild N] sys-devel/gcc-3.4.4-r1 (-altivec
On Monday 09 January 2006 10:51, Daiajo Tibdixious wrote:
> # emerge --ask --verbose gcc
>
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies ...done!
> [ebuild N] sys-devel/gcc-3.4.4-r1 (-altivec) -bootstrap
> -boundschecking -build +fortran -gcj +gtk -harden
On Пнд, 2006-01-09 at 20:51 +1100, Daiajo Tibdixious wrote:
> # emerge --ask --verbose gcc
> fails with this error
> /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: cannot find /emul/linux/x86/lib/libc.so.6
Try this thread:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-387931-highlight-gcc+libc+6
+emul.html
Peter.
2006/1/9, Jamie Dobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Jamie Dobbs wrote:> Richard Fish wrote:>>> On 1/8/06, Jamie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>>> I'm still having the same error and cannot work out any way to fix it
>>> without removing gnome - which I do not want to do if I can avoid it.>>> Can anyone sugg
# emerge --ask --verbose gcc
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild N] sys-devel/gcc-3.4.4-r1 (-altivec) -bootstrap
-boundschecking -build +fortran -gcj +gtk -hardened -ip28 -mudflap
(-multilib) +multislot (-n32) (-n64) +nls -nocxx -no
On Monday 09 January 2006 08:34, Michael Ulm wrote:
> I played with equery depends, but found no dependency
> on the old versions. Any ideas how to find and remove
> those dependencies?
Probably not the nicest way but you "could" use this:
find /var/db/pkg/ -name "*.ebuild" -exec grep sys-apps/dbus
34 matches
Mail list logo
