On 16-05-2008 17:41:01 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
>
> Yes !! I have finished a bootstrop for Solaris x86_64. Everything is
> fine and I think the procedure except for subversion, I used rsync
> instead.
>
> Juste one strang things :
> my scripts starts with :
> umask=
> but :
> drwxr-x
Yes !! I have finished a bootstrop for Solaris x86_64. Everything is
fine and I think the procedure except for subversion, I used rsync
instead.
Juste one strang things :
my scripts starts with :
umask=
but :
drwxr-x--x 12 root root 13 May 16 16:12 usr
drwxr-x--x 8 root root8 May
On 14-05-2008 18:02:32 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 14-05-2008 17:54:23 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
> > Argg, they wan't my death at gnu.
> > While compiling m4 :
> >
> > strtod.c: In function `rpl_strtod':
> > strtod.c:155: error: incompatible types in assignment
> >
> > sed -n '155 p' s
On 15-05-2008 11:06:14 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
> bash needs it during boot strap.
> So I added
> emerge --oneshot =sys-devel/m4-1.4.10-r3
> just before the merging of bash.
So, you're already using `emerge`. That means, I can apply the patch we
found earlier, and hope it doesn't break
bash needs it during boot strap.
So I added
emerge --oneshot =sys-devel/m4-1.4.10-r3
just before the merging of bash.
Le 15 mai 08 à 07:39, Fabian Groffen a écrit :
On 14-05-2008 18:36:46 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
Ehm? Why are you installing m4 if you don't have "emerge" availab
On 14-05-2008 18:36:46 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
>
> Le 14 mai 08 à 18:10, Fabian Groffen a écrit :
>> [hathor:solaris/5.10/sparc] % emerge -av m4
>>
>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>>
>> Calculating dependencies... done!
>> [ebuild R ] sys-devel/m4-1.4.11 USE="
Le 14 mai 08 à 18:10, Fabian Groffen a écrit :
[hathor:solaris/5.10/sparc] % emerge -av m4
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild R ] sys-devel/m4-1.4.11 USE="nls -examples" 0 kB
I'm doing the bootstrap process, so I can't run em
On 14-05-2008 18:05:55 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
>>> this one is known :
>>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-m4/2008-04/msg00084.html
>>
>> But this is using an ebuild, right?
>
> Yes, it is.
>
>> So I can apply this patch [1] if it
>> works.
>
> Thanks.
Before I get lost:
[hathor:so
Le 14 mai 08 à 18:02, Fabian Groffen a écrit :
On 14-05-2008 17:54:23 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
Argg, they wan't my death at gnu.
While compiling m4 :
strtod.c: In function `rpl_strtod':
strtod.c:155: error: incompatible types in assignment
sed -n '155 p' strtod.c
num = HUGE_V
On 14-05-2008 17:54:23 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
> Argg, they wan't my death at gnu.
> While compiling m4 :
>
> strtod.c: In function `rpl_strtod':
> strtod.c:155: error: incompatible types in assignment
>
> sed -n '155 p' strtod.c
> num = HUGE_VAL;
>
> this one is known :
> http:/
Le 14 mai 08 à 17:23, Bacchella Fabrice a écrit :
Le 14 mai 08 à 15:13, Fabian Groffen a écrit :
On 13-05-2008 20:09:02 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
believe the code compiles fine. I've added findutils3 target for
this,
installing 4.3.11 again. Please report if that works.
This ver
On 14-05-2008 17:23:32 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
>
> Le 14 mai 08 à 15:13, Fabian Groffen a écrit :
>
>> On 13-05-2008 20:09:02 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
>>> believe the code compiles fine. I've added findutils3 target for this,
>> installing 4.3.11 again. Please report if that works.
Le 14 mai 08 à 15:13, Fabian Groffen a écrit :
On 13-05-2008 20:09:02 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
believe the code compiles fine. I've added findutils3 target for
this,
installing 4.3.11 again. Please report if that works.
This version is not on ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/findutils any mo
On 13-05-2008 20:09:02 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
> I have done more test. I have the problem even with this simple programm :
> #include
> int main()
> {
> double d = -HUGE_VAL;
> }
>
> gcc -std=gnu99 test.c
> test.c: In function `main':
> test.c:4: error: wrong type argument to unary m
Le 8 mai 08 à 16:35, Bacchella Fabrice a écrit :
When I download it from gnu, do a ./configure ; make, it works
perfectly with Sun Workshop and brokes using gcc either with a 32 or
64 bits compilation.--
gentoo-alt@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
I have done more test. I have the problem ev
Le 8 mai 08 à 15:49, Fabian Groffen a écrit :
On 08-05-2008 15:46:12 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
I think that your way of bootstrapping 64-bits is causing the
trouble.
I have no problem compiling findutils using a Prefix compiler.
Please
try the bootstrap instructions, which differ sli
On 08-05-2008 15:46:12 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
>> I think that your way of bootstrapping 64-bits is causing the trouble.
>> I have no problem compiling findutils using a Prefix compiler. Please
>> try the bootstrap instructions, which differ slightly from yours. It
>> does initial bootstr
Le 7 mai 08 à 22:15, Fabian Groffen a écrit :
On 07-05-2008 22:05:48 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
Le 7 mai 08 à 20:35, Fabian Groffen a écrit :
Hehe
are you bootstrapping?
64-bits Solaris isn't in my usual testing stage. I'll see what I
encounter.
Yes, still. I'm bonehead about b
On 07-05-2008 22:05:48 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
>
> Le 7 mai 08 à 20:35, Fabian Groffen a écrit :
>>
>> Hehe
>> are you bootstrapping?
>>
>> 64-bits Solaris isn't in my usual testing stage. I'll see what I
>> encounter.
>
> Yes, still. I'm bonehead about bootstrapping 64bits without a g
Le 7 mai 08 à 20:35, Fabian Groffen a écrit :
Hehe
are you bootstrapping?
64-bits Solaris isn't in my usual testing stage. I'll see what I
encounter.
Yes, still. I'm bonehead about bootstrapping 64bits without a glitch.
It's not just for playing, but a big production environnment.--
On 07-05-2008 20:18:51 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
>
> Le 7 mai 08 à 18:53, Jeremy Olexa a écrit :
>>
>>
>> But, I don't even know if that is valid... It would be interesting to
>> know if you could compile findutils by hand, using the trusty
>> ./configure, make, make install. Hopefully someon
Le 7 mai 08 à 18:53, Jeremy Olexa a écrit :
But, I don't even know if that is valid... It would be interesting to
know if you could compile findutils by hand, using the trusty
./configure, make, make install. Hopefully someone else can chime in
here.
I got it when I build manually
my exports
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Bacchella Fabrice
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Grr, I couldn't reproduce this one either while compiling findutils by
hand. A quick google search of:
> pred.c:661: error: wrong type argument to unary minus
Leads me to trying this (in pred.c):
-return p->st_blocks
While doing
./bootstrap-prefix.sh $EPREFIX/tmp findutils
the build failed with the message :
i386-pc-solaris2.10-gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../
gnulib/lib -I../lib -I../gnulib/lib -I../intl -DLOCALEDIR=\"/data/
gentoo/tmp/usr/share/locale\"-O2 -pipe -MT pred.o -MD -MP -
24 matches
Mail list logo
