>
> >
> >
> > $ CBUILD=i586-pc-winnt PREFIX=/opt/gentoo.winnt emerge -v parity
> >
Small update: no CHOST/CBUILD stuff has to be set on the command line. It is
enough to set EPREFIX only, the rest is done from the
profiles.
Cheers, Markus
>
> I have one big problem left, where I need some he
>
> oups... :)
>
> thanks for the hint: fairly easy to match with the 12 within brackets
> from the gmail interface :D
So any more questions? :)
Cheers, Markus
>
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Jeremy Olexa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > alessandro salvatori wrote:
> >>
> >> hi guys,
> >>
oups... :)
thanks for the hint: fairly easy to match with the 12 within brackets
from the gmail interface :D
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Jeremy Olexa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> alessandro salvatori wrote:
>>
>> hi guys,
>>
>> did I miss something?
>>
>>i586-pc-interix*)
>
alessandro salvatori wrote:
hi guys,
did I miss something?
i586-pc-interix*)
profile="${PORTDIR}/profiles/default-prefix/windows/interix/${CHOST#i586-pc-interix}/x86"
- keywords="~x86-interix x86-interix"
+ ;;
+ i586-
hi guys,
did I miss something?
i586-pc-interix*)
profile="${PORTDIR}/profiles/default-prefix/windows/interix/${CHOST#i586-pc-interix}/x86"
- keywords="~x86-interix x86-interix"
+ ;;
+ i586-pc-winnt*)
+
profile="${PORTDI
havent used my prefix on osx.4.11, ppc in a while and went to update
and didnt get far, any ideas ?
thanks
matt
/bin/sh ../subst-install --installcmd='/Users/matt/gentoo/usr/bin/
install -c -o matt -g matt -m 644' ./sets.conf /Users/matt/gentoo/var/
tmp/portage/sys-apps/portage-2.2.00.9894/
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 12:32 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 15-05-2008 11:58:50 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > While 'ia64-hpux' is a multilib platform, and the compilers (HP-cc, gcc)
> > support this, their default output still is 32bit.
> >
> > This is the reason why cur
On 14-05-2008 18:02:32 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 14-05-2008 17:54:23 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
> > Argg, they wan't my death at gnu.
> > While compiling m4 :
> >
> > strtod.c: In function `rpl_strtod':
> > strtod.c:155: error: incompatible types in assignment
> >
> > sed -n '155 p' s
Am 15.05.2008 um 09:48 schrieb Fabian Groffen:
Hmmm, can you check if the configure argument includes --disable-nls?
I edit bootstrap-prefix.sh at line 445:
#[[ $CHOST == *-aix* ]] || myconf="${myconf} --disable-nls"
and grep bootstraped without problems.
But for bootstraping gawk I
On 15-05-2008 15:25:02 +0200, Markus Duft wrote:
> > Thanks for the in depth explanation. I'd not be surprised if Solaris
> > actually has the same problem.
>
> If solaris supports ssp, yes, i think so too.
I think it does support stack smashing protector stuff ;)
> > I've no idea of it in the
>
> On 15-05-2008 22:46:13 +1000, Matt Michalowski wrote:
> > This is what I get with openssh-5.0_p1-r1 on amd64-linux:
> > x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -o ssh ssh.o readconf.o clientloop.o sshtty.o
> > sshconnect.o sshconnect1.o sshconnect2.o -L. -Lopenbsd-compat/
> > -fstack-protector -lssh -lopenbsd
On 15-05-2008 22:46:13 +1000, Matt Michalowski wrote:
> This is what I get with openssh-5.0_p1-r1 on amd64-linux:
> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -o ssh ssh.o readconf.o clientloop.o sshtty.o
> sshconnect.o sshconnect1.o sshconnect2.o -L. -Lopenbsd-compat/
> -fstack-protector -lssh -lopenbsd-compat -L
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 15-05-2008 10:45:56 +0200, Markus Duft wrote:
Fabian,
what about the openssh 5.0 mask? Could you check that again, please?
It even compiles on interix ;) so shouldn't be too much of a problem.
Also I get the impression that it's not much different from v4.7,
since ne
Markus Duft wrote:
Any thoughts about this? What about openrc? I must admit, that I right now have
just a very shallow knowledge of all this... still I
feel that sooner or later we'll need _some_ facility to run init.d scripts -
even if it's manual only.
I feel that openrc is the way to go p
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 15-05-2008 12:05:23 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
For the ia64-linux I can see some future, as HP pushes the Itanium
platform in general, running either HP-UX, Linux or Windows (and even
OpenVMS).
Although we do not run Linux on ia64 yet, because it is 64bit only
>
>
> $ CBUILD=i586-pc-winnt PREFIX=/opt/gentoo.winnt emerge -v parity
>
I have one big problem left, where I need some help thinking about it: inside
the windows prefix I can only emerge some special
stuff (so no coreutils or such things), so I really have a dependency to the
interix prefix
Fabian,
it just came to my head, that since you're using interix, you have to deal with
some problems, I have solved for our company
already. I though you may be interested in the bash profile I attached. Create
a .profile.user for your user supplied stuff (for
example set EPREFIX there, otherwi
On 15-05-2008 11:58:50 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While 'ia64-hpux' is a multilib platform, and the compilers (HP-cc, gcc)
> support this, their default output still is 32bit.
>
> This is the reason why currently the 'ia64-hpux' keyword in prefix
> stands for 32bit, but IMO thi
On 15-05-2008 12:05:23 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> For the ia64-linux I can see some future, as HP pushes the Itanium
> platform in general, running either HP-UX, Linux or Windows (and even
> OpenVMS).
>
> Although we do not run Linux on ia64 yet, because it is 64bit only
> (unlike hpux,
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 10:02 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> Another candidate is ia64-linux, which I used to use/have access to, but
> I do not use any more, since it's simply not really adding anything for
> me. If noone needs it, I'd like to drop it as well. So also here,
> speak up if you nee
Hi,
While 'ia64-hpux' is a multilib platform, and the compilers (HP-cc, gcc)
support this, their default output still is 32bit.
This is the reason why currently the 'ia64-hpux' keyword in prefix
stands for 32bit, but IMO this is just wrong.
What I could think of is something like this:
1) For "
> >
> > Now the child-prefix can be set-up with bootstrap-prefix.sh like this:
> >
> > $ CHOST=i586-pc-winnt6.0 EPREFIX=/opt/gentoo.winnt
> > /opt/gentoo.system/usr/portage/scripts/bootstrap-prefix.sh tree
> > $ CHOST=i586-pc-winnt6.0 EPREFIX=/opt/gentoo.winnt
> > /opt/gentoo.system/usr/portage/scr
On 15-05-2008 11:06:14 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
> bash needs it during boot strap.
> So I added
> emerge --oneshot =sys-devel/m4-1.4.10-r3
> just before the merging of bash.
So, you're already using `emerge`. That means, I can apply the patch we
found earlier, and hope it doesn't break
bash needs it during boot strap.
So I added
emerge --oneshot =sys-devel/m4-1.4.10-r3
just before the merging of bash.
Le 15 mai 08 à 07:39, Fabian Groffen a écrit :
On 14-05-2008 18:36:46 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
Ehm? Why are you installing m4 if you don't have "emerge" availab
On 15-05-2008 10:45:56 +0200, Markus Duft wrote:
> Fabian,
>
> what about the openssh 5.0 mask? Could you check that again, please?
> It even compiles on interix ;) so shouldn't be too much of a problem.
> Also I get the impression that it's not much different from v4.7,
> since nearly all patches
Fabian,
what about the openssh 5.0 mask? Could you check that again, please? It even
compiles on interix ;) so shouldn't be too much of a
problem. Also I get the impression that it's not much different from v4.7,
since nearly all patches/hunks applied unmodified. Which
symbols where undefined wh
On 15-05-2008 10:12:01 +0200, Markus Duft wrote:
> Hi
>
> I just fixed the openssh server for interix (yeehaa), and for the
> purpose of starting this whole thing without worrying about keys and
> such, I would have really liked to use the init.d script to fire it
> up. The init script still would
Hi
I just fixed the openssh server for interix (yeehaa), and for the purpose of
starting this whole thing without worrying about keys
and such, I would have really liked to use the init.d script to fire it up. The
init script still would require some
eprefixification, but the bigger problem is,
Currently we "inherit" many *-linux keywords from the main tree. The
~mips-linux keyword is one of them. However, since nobody on the team
has such machine, and I also don't know of any active users of a Prefix
on such machine, we decided to drop the keyword. If you're using it,
speak up now bef
On 15-05-2008 08:50:59 +0200, krischan wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm trying to install the gentoo prefix portage on my Mac OS X (10.4.11).
>
> But after "./bootstrap-prefix.sh $EPREFIX/tmp grep" I get this error:
>
> [...]
> gcc -O2 -pipe -o grep grep.o dfa.o kwset.o search.o grepmat.o
> ../l
On 15-05-2008 08:52:16 +0200, Markus Duft wrote:
> > That feels like an awfully ugly hack. Sorry to say so. Gives me an
> > idea on where/why/how though...
>
> I know it's an ugly hack, yes, and I feel it's really a bug in the
> binutils build mechanism, since that should set the rpath correctly
31 matches
Mail list logo
