n guide is available at [4]. The KEYS file is
available at [5]
Thanks for taking your time for validating this release!
Best
Tim
[1]
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/streampipes/0.70.0/rc1/
[2]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestreampipes-1019
your time to review our release
candidate!
We will proceed with publishing the approved artifacts and sending out
the announcements in the coming days.
On behalf of the Apache StreamPipes Community,
Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
ttp://www.apache.org/licenses/.
Tim O'Brien
> -Original Message-
> From: Marinschek Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 6:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Anyone wants to incubate MyFaces?
>
> Hi there,
>
> Our project w
x27;d
recommend taking some time to read:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html. This will go a long way
to demystify the ASF and the Incubator.
Tim O'Brien
-Original Message-
From: Marinschek Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 11:32 AM
To: [EMAIL
BEA has a very public marketing campaign around Apache Beehive, and I'm
not saying this is a bad thing per se. It is good to see BEA is so
involved with Beehive, and I hope it takes off, but it seems a little
presumptious to advertise for "Apache Beehive" when the project is not
yet incubated.
I
Alright just to close this one out.
The word from the PRC: call it "Apache " but include a qualifier,
like "Apache Beehive, currently in incubation" or "Derby, currently in
the Apache Incubator".
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday,
x archive complete?
Tell me if I'm just being dumb -- otherwise I'll raise a JIRA issue on
infra.
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200507.mbox/index.html
[2] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=incubator-general&m=112286923903658
Regards,
Tim Ellison
Davi
e' link on that page appears to do the wrong thing by
displaying the mark-up.
Consider replacing it with
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED
ut please, add a feature in Forrest to show a list of
> files it found that it won't process. I think that really help users.
>
> geir
>
> --
> Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Forrest project uses a tool called JIRA [1] s
mmunity members because of your own laziness?I think all of the
folks on Forrest openly admit to its blemishes (and it has plenty),
more so than other projects I think. But it's unfortunate to hear
fellow community members spou
Found a few small typos on the incubator site:
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ApacheIncubatorProjectPages/Err
ata
Nothing major, I'm just a nit picking proofreader.
----
Tim O'Brien
-
To unsu
> Could you check out the incubator-site module from cvs
> and send in your fixes in patch format?
Here's the patch.
----
Tim
? patchfile.txt
Index: src/documentation/content/xdocs/rules-for-revolutionaries.xml
=
Would you please provide me with additional informaiton
regards
Tim Dawson
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
my skills to the project in whatever capacity possible.
--
Tim Pokorny
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.littlebluefrog.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
The core developers of the OpenEJB team and I sent in CLA's, but we're
not an official committers (David Blevins asked us to so, probably
because of our work on OpenEJB). We're not sure what that means, but
we've done it. :)
Tim Urberg (speaking for the OpenEJB team)
Greg
Will Geronimo integrate existing OS,
or is it intended to have a standalone codebase?
-Tim
Committer, OpenJMS (http://openjms.sf.net), JMS CTS (http://jmscts.sf.net)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
in
one's spare time always takes awhile, especially trying to do
them as they should be done, thus the delay...
When we have a stronger community then we can look at making
a proposal...
It's been exciting to see things go forward in the incubator in the mean time.
Tim
eared
> towards EJB & MDBs.
I have a question about this. What parts of JBoss, OpenEJB, and MX4J did you
use? I curious about this because I'm an OpenEJB committer.
Thanks,
Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC
I'm willing to help integrate OpenJMS -
I'm not in a position to donate the OpenJMS
codebase, and I'm not particularly interested
in forking it.
-Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Boynes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 August 2003 12:19 P
file nowadays vs. copying that over
periodically to KEYS?
Thanks,
--tim
[1] - http://people.apache.org/keys/group/spark.asc
[2] -
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#distribution-signing
-
To unsubscribe, e
+1
--tim
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 4:07 AM, Nathan Marz wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to propose Storm to be an Apache Incubator project. After much
> thought I believe this is the right next step for the project, and I look
> forward to hearing everyone's thoughts a
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:18 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 4 September 2013 02:31, Tim Williams wrote:
>> I notice that Chris just pointed[1] spark to the nifty keys
>> listing[1]. Our docs still imply manual maintenance of the typical
>> KEYS file[2]. Honestly, I didn't eve
Moving this[1] to general@
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 2:55 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Saturday, September 14, 2013, Tim Williams wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>> I've included references inline for your convenience. I'll once again
>> [strongly] suggest you guys remove that a
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 5:19 AM, ant elder wrote:
> Tim, one of the things we're trying to teach podlings is how to handle
> disputes and resolve problems in a happy respectful manner. You've out
> of the blue come on to their dev list without introducing yourself
> demandi
Looks like you are a member, are you getting permission denied on
something specific?
twilliams@minotaur:~$ list_unix_group.pl incubator | grep gagz
gagz
Thanks,
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apach
uided, or lack of
insight :)
Tim
On 21/06/14 00:37, Julian Hyde wrote:
> The dozen or so messages from abiola balogun on this list
> in the past month have been monosyllabic non sequiturs [1]. I think he/she/it
> is a spam bot and propose that he/she/it be removed from the list.
>
;s what
you're referring to. I'm still under that impression [as one of the
mentors] that we require 3 binding IPMC votes. If that's changed and I
missed it, let me be the first to buy you a beer at the next ApacheCon
for enlightening us:)
Thanks,
--tim
-
carry through here leaving us 1 shy of
3 binding +1 votes from IPMC members. I'm not seeing the point of
confusion here.
Thanks,
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
e canonical place for you to look up
PPMC members - I've never really cared because they're not binding.
Since you give some meaning to [1] - I've done what needs to be done
to get Chris added there, not sure how long it will take to show up.
Are you interested in helping revi
ture the PPMC is a formal part of the IPMC's internal
organization.
--tim
> On Friday, July 25, 2014, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
>> The PPMC is not, and never has been, a formally recognized part of our
>> structure. But as I said that's a technicality in this context, the
been fulfilled.
The initial query was about finding MIA mentors - I reckon changing
the mentor_tick_pattern to look for unsigned reports would help with
that?
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apach
gt; since you say it represents existing policy. Since I can find no
> place on the IPMC or ASF website where this policy is actually stated
> (and please correct me if I missed it), it might be good if we took my
> summary from above and put it into the Podling Release Guide. I kno
is there a new page that lists the reporting schedule? The old
page[1] just has a link to "next month" but I'm interested in knowing
*this* month.
Thanks,
--tim
[1] - http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
-
Drats, found it as soon as i hit send...
http://incubator.apache.org/report-groups.txt
--tim
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Tim Williams wrote:
> is there a new page that lists the reporting schedule? The old
> page[1] just has a link to "next month" but I'm interest
Hi Jukka,
You'll need to add Blur to these rotations I reckon
Thanks,
--tim
On Saturday, September 8, 2012, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With apologies for the lateness, here are the shepherd assignments for
> this month:
>
> Benson Margulies - Cordova, F
h qualified mentors." ... in hopes that the second half of that
will ultimately address the 'indefinite' concern...
Thanks,
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.or
General note: if you are a PPMC member or mentor, and you feel that
> your community is undersupplied with Mentor attention (e.g., you have
> trouble getting votes for releases), please start a thread here.
The report is meant to communicate th
fyi, Blur just finished their monthly reporting obligation. I
miscalculated where we'd end up when I set it up initially and we
should be in group 2 vs. group 3. I've updated podlings.xml, I'll
remove us from December, if anyone knows anywhere else needing updated
let me know...
; In my opinion constant nagging is not necessary - "did not report"
> does the job as well as this line is a report as well; if a project
> constantly fails report to report its more a matter to retirement than
>
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Tim Williams wrote:
>>> FWIW, I feel the same. I'd rather see 'did not report' and let the
>>>
Hmm... is that the right reporting group?
http://incubator.apache.org/report-groups.txt
Thanks,
--tim
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Looks good.
>
> btw: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2013
> On Dec 29, 2012 6:42 PM, "Benson Margulies" w
On Saturday, February 2, 2013, wrote:
> Author: grobmeier
> Date: Sat Feb 2 15:22:33 2013
> New Revision: 1441762
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1441762&view=rev
> Log:
> updated status page for onami
>
> Modified:
> incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/onami.xml
>
> Modified: i
overly burdensome (yes, even a
tiny-little-heartbeat report). Let's please not add overhead/burden
to healthy podlings for the sake of the few unhealthy.
Thanks,
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...
ed to solve, in
that way, we are afforded the opportunity to propose an alternative
solution - for example, by focusing on highlighting the problem
mentors/podlings.
Thanks,
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
it all. A lot. It's an attempt to solve the real problem.
But how do you define "inactive" and how do you identify them and on
what periodicity? And, if they're a Member how long must such a
person wait before re-signin
+1
--tim
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> OK discussion has died down, time to VOTE to accept Spark into the
> Apache Incubator. I'll let the VOTE run for at least a week.
>
> So far I've heard +1s from the following fol
Stratos project as an incubating project
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> because... (provide reason)
+1 (check-my-binding-status-and-dont-rely-on-the-"caller-asserts"-model)
Thanks,
--tim
ocial norms can
be overridden/bullied occasionally by headstrong, salty old-timers as
they see fit...
Thanks,
--tim
> Sent from a mobile device, please excuse mistakes and brevity
> On 18 Jun 2013 03:18, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Ross G
Why not take it from the number Clutch reports?
On Monday, July 8, 2013, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Greets,
>
> For our report, I'd like to supply an official count of podlings under
> incubation. Here's one way of doing it from the incubator svn checkout:
>
> grep . content/report_due_* | wc -l
x27;t care
> [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason:
+1
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> We would like to propose Mesos as an incubator proposal.
+1, best wishes...
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additio
embarrassing chapter.
--tim
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
>
> As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
> down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffi
eft for incubation
>
> Vote will be running for 72 hours.
+1, best wishes...
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
cept Accumulo for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to Accumulo incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject Accumulo for incubation
+1, welcome!
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
s:
- the proposal doesn't have a champion, wouldn't that be you?
- are the core developers listed actively committing code to the project?
I like it, happy to help mentor if needed...
Thanks,
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e
eful that one person would step forth and
claim to be the champion of bringing a certain project to the ASF and
[implicitly] agree to pushing down any artificial process hurdles. It
seems like we've had such hurdles and brave champions in the past but
I'm too lazy to dig right now...
--
Accept S4 for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to S4 incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject S4 for incubation
+1
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Discussion seems to have waned and with an overall positive vibe - are
we ready to call the vote?
Thanks,
--tim
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> I would like to propose DirectMemory, a Java OpenSource multi-layered
> cache implementation featuring
+1
--tim
On Sunday, October 2, 2011, Ashish wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>>
>> I'm now calling a formal VOTE on the DirectMemory proposal located here:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incuba
ide more helpful.
Thanks,
--tim
[1] - http://incubator.apache.org/guides/pmc.html
[2] - http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Set+Up+Repository
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For ad
ore eyes are better, but then it would not be the
Incubator PMC specifically that could catch such problems.
Regards,
Tim
> 2. If there is no additional 'community', for instance a single
> developer contributing the work into a project, and if the TLP PMC is
> comfortable to take on
ne knows who sent this fax, please contact them to resend it.
Maybe worth pointing out it is an ICLA dated 7/30/09, in case that helps
anyone.
Regards,
Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For a
a small team now and sort of a catch-22. The
blogging is good, btw, it's what reminded me of you:) Oddly enough,
I suspect these things would be more likely to generate developer
interest than a release would. Anyway, just an opinion...
--tim
[1] - Example: http://couchdb.apa
Hudson build machine accounts are created upon request for members of
(P)PMCs.
Does the Cassandra project have a PPMC? I don't see one in the
asf-authorization file, and have a request from Eric for an account [1].
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2362
Thanks
at list that need
> to be sifted through.
May I suggest that membership of incubator PPMCs is recorded publicly
since it is a pain having to search for individual's membership vote
results.
Regards,
Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
me
technology, and we are always looking for new ways to improve them
across a variety of platforms.
Regards,
Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
fully considered the implications of
being a part of Apache. Just curious...
Thanks,
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
roject?" (or somesuch) In the
answer, we'd hope to learn if they "get" it. We'd also be sure that,
to a certain extent, they'd researched and come to terms with its
elusive nature. So, yeah, it was a sincere question...
--tim
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
>
> Thanks for your patience and consideration.
+1, happy e
really. This thread, like Joe's
thread, makes me wonder how such a pioneering group got such an
obeying/mother-may-i culture - it's nearly embarrassing.
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
that it could be slightly more
complicated than the two parties you mention above.
Thanks,
--tim
[1] -
http://sourceforge.net/projects/nakedobjects/forums/forum/544071/topic/3742184
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incu
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
wrote:
> Hi Tim...
>
> From this link - http://sourceforge.net/projects/nakedobjects -
> project details section, it is stated that the code of this project is
> licensed under (Apache License v2.0), and hence it is the
>
hanism for performing the oversight role they're
responsible for.
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
thing is that they come up with a name that they
can rally around. Assuming they've done the mark searches, it's not
clear why we have much of a stake in this other than friendly
advice
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Dan Haywood wrote:
> On 30/08/2010 07:26, Tim Williams wrote:
>>
>> Your proposal caused me to poke around the NO site and the first forum
>> topic I came upon[1] had someone providing a [simple] patch. This has
>> me curious about the
so copied below.
>
> Please, cast your vote.
>
> [ ] +1, please indicate whether binding
> [ ] =0
> [ ] -1, please indicate your reason
+1, binding...
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apac
don't personally like the name but not sure what the basis would
possibly be that the IPMC wouldn't just Ack this
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
things seems counter-productive to grooming
self-sustaining projects to me. So, is this normal - why does the
IPMC really get anything more than an "advising" role in these sorts
of matters (and why is that healthy)?
Thanks,
--tim
[1] -
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Role
to
think through these things... in other words, the basis for us
challenging the vote is "trademark concern" rather than "I don't like
that name, it's too broad"...
... but I haven't seen a mark concern brought up...
--tim
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Ti
ojects to do the right thing, ask for an ack, and
then only challenge the project on the basis of a
legal/release/trademark/etc issue.
If we tell the projects that you have to re-vote with the peanut
gallery, then the peanut gallery effect is predictable. Those votes,
for example, are because they d
I might be missing it, but is there a link to the existing GPL project/code?
Thanks
--tim
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Urs Lerch wrote:
> Hi
>
> Since the first call a few weeks ago didn't suceed (more mentors were
> asked), I would like to call a second vote for accep
ion. I am
unsure what would cause us to say no. My vote here is now binding so
I thought it better to watch and learn how more experienced folk
rationalize this. Anyway, that's bordering on too much information
but that's why *I* ignored it:)
--tim
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:06 PM
+1
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Sander W G van der Waal
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Sander
>
>> From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@apache.org]
>> Sent: 08 November 2010 23:37
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: [Proposal] Accept Jena into the Incubator
>>
>> I am pleased to of
te over at ComDev (along with
> the modification suggested by Craig).
Hi Ross,
These look familiar, where in svn can I look for these improved
versions? and, are they accessible to all committers?
Thanks,
--tim
-
To unsub
ts and give us the feedback.
Hi Roman,
Is there a KEYS file? I'm getting a "public key not found" and I
don't see a KEYS file to import them from?
Thanks,
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@
esday of that month" (Wed, Dec 14th in
this case).
I reckon the board's recent decision of 1 week notice has caused some
docs to be out of sync and I've probably missed the discussion. What
is the correct due date?
Thanks,
--tim
[1] - http:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 2 December 2011 13:11, Tim Williams wrote:
>> Marvin says... "supply board reports 2 weeks before the above date
>> (Wed, Dec 7th)."
>
> That's Incubator Marvin, who requires podlings to provide an extra week&#x
+1
--tim
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Marcel Offermans
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> As the discussion about the resolution [1] offered no further feedback, it is
> time for the Apache ACE community to request that the IPMC vote on
> recommending this resolution [2] to the ASF bo
Wrong year:)
--tim
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Apache Wiki wrote:
> Dear Wiki user,
>
> You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Incubator Wiki" for
> change notification.
>
> The "February2011" page has been changed by brianlero
wn somewhere but it'd
sure be nice to have some framework to agree on our desired
organizational/cultural properties, then reason about what real
constraints are in place and how/why they evoke those desired
properties. I forget what motivated me then, I think it was a round
of debate over some pha
ary. What's not to like?
>>
>
> I'd still like a definitive list of who is running and a "real"
> vote that includes all candidates. Is the presumption that Jukka
> is the only candidate valid??
gt;
> [ ] +1 Recommend Jukka Zitting for the IPMC chair position.
> [ ] +0 Don't care.
> [ ] -1 Don't recommend Jukka Zitting for the IPMC chair position because...
+1
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsub
't care
> -1: do not accept CloudStack into Incubator (please explain the objection)
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours from now (until at least 19:00 US-PST
> on April 12, 2012).
+1
Thanks,
--tim
-
To
+1
--tim
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are proposing Allura to be admitted to the Apache Incubator, and would
> like to request that the IPMC votes on this issue. The requisite 72 hours has
> passed since the initial proposal.
>
> The pro
Apache membership that allows that to happen:)
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
; 12:12:43 2012
>> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
>>
>>
>>
>> - The road to graduation pretty clear: depending on wether
>> your
>> + The road to gradua
Incubation is unnecessary process in this case. I don't see any reason
this should go through incubation.
--tim
On Saturday, June 30, 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> For those not following board@, the board is proposing the creation
> of a new TLP (tentatively called Apache Steve)
rongly encourage a more passive board-style
role (e.g. stepping in only when a problem exists).
The "burstiness", btw, is likely a result of this being a true
volunteer effort - AFAIK, no one's being paid to hack on it.
Thanks,
--tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
to subtickets does not concern
> me, but the lack of detail in these requests is strikingly bad
> and needs to be addressed by the IPMC. Thanks.
Hi Joe,
Can you point to a ticket [or tickets] from a graduating podling that
got it right?
Thanks,
--tim
--
inkedhashmap - Apache 2.0 License -
> http://code.google.com/p/concurrentlinkedhashmap/
>
> == Cryptography ==
> none
>
> == Required Resources ==
> * Mailing Lists
>* blur-private
> * blur-dev
>* blur-commits
>* blur-user
> * Subversion Directory
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
