+1 (binding)
Willem Jiang
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 2:56 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling
The vote passes with 17 +1's.
I will work with the podling to do the actual retirement.
John
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 1:56 PM John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling.
>
> The podling has positively voted to retire [1].
+1 (binding)
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 16.01.2018 um 12:22 schrieb Stian Soiland-Reyes :
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On 8 January 2018 at 18:56, John D. Ament wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling.
>>
>> The podli
+1 (binding)
On 8 January 2018 at 18:56, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling.
>
> The podling has positively voted to retire [1]. I now call upon the IPMC
> to confirm this retirement.
>
> [ ] +1 to retire
> [
+1
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:56 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> All,
>
> This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling.
>
> The podling has positively voted to retire [1]. I now call upon the IPMC
> to confirm this retirement.
>
> [ ] +1 to retire
> [
+1 (binding)
> On Jan 8, 2018, at 1:56 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> All,
>
> This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling.
>
> The podling has positively voted to retire [1]. I now call upon the IPMC
> to confirm this retirement.
>
> [ ] +1 t
+1 to retire (binding)
Jacques
Le 08/01/2018 à 19:56, John D. Ament a écrit :
All,
This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling.
The podling has positively voted to retire [1]. I now call upon the IPMC
to confirm this retirement.
[ ] +1 to retire
[ ] +/- 0 to retire
+1 (binding)
On Jan 8, 2018 19:57, "John D. Ament" wrote:
> All,
>
> This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling.
>
> The podling has positively voted to retire [1]. I now call upon the IPMC
> to confirm this retirement.
>
> [ ] +1 to ret
+1 to retire (binding)
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 12:56 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> All,
>
> This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling.
>
> The podling has positively voted to retire [1]. I now call upon the IPMC
> to confirm this retirement.
>
> [ ] +1
+1 (binding)
-Gon
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 3:56 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling.
>
> The podling has positively voted to retire [1]. I now call upon the IPMC
> to confirm this retirement.
>
> [ ] +1
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:56 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling.
>
> The podling has positively voted to retire [1]. I now call upon the IPMC
> to confirm this retirement.
>
> [ ] +1 to retire
> [ ] +/-
+1 for retirement (binding)
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 8:34 PM, Danese Cooper wrote:
> +1 to retire (binding)
>
> Danese
>
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 6:56 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling.
>&
+1
Best regards,
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
V.P. Apache Trafodion
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 8:48 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> -Taylor
>
> > On Jan 8, 2018, at 1:56 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > This is a call to v
+1 (binding)
-Taylor
> On Jan 8, 2018, at 1:56 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> All,
>
> This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling.
>
> The podling has positively voted to retire [1]. I now call upon the IPMC
> to confirm this retirement.
>
> [
+1 binding(ish)
On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, at 7:46 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> +1. (Binding)
>
> > On Jan 8, 2018, at 10:56 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling.
> >
> > The podling
+1. (Binding)
> On Jan 8, 2018, at 10:56 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> All,
>
> This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling.
>
> The podling has positively voted to retire [1]. I now call upon the IPMC
> to confirm this retirement.
>
> [ ] +1 t
+1 to retire (binding)
Danese
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 6:56 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling.
>
> The podling has positively voted to retire [1]. I now call upon the IPMC
> to confirm this retirement.
&g
+1 (binding)
On 8 January 2018 at 10:56, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling.
>
> The podling has positively voted to retire [1]. I now call upon the IPMC
> to confirm this retirement.
>
> [ ] +1 to retire
> [
All,
This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling.
The podling has positively voted to retire [1]. I now call upon the IPMC
to confirm this retirement.
[ ] +1 to retire
[ ] +/- 0 to retire
[ ] -1 don't retire because...
The podling is working on a migration plan, it
The Apache Wave community is pleased to announce 0.4.0-incubating release.
The source and binary release can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/wave/0.4.0-incubating/
<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/wave/0.4.0-incubating/>
Changes:
;m really careful now on this file, so, I'm 100%
> sure ;))
> DISCLAIMER exists
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 02/01/2016 11:32 PM, Andreas Kotes wrote:
> > Hello esteemed PPMCs,
> >
> > is there something you need for Apache Wave to get some more traction on
> &
+1 (binding)
LICENSE is OK
NOTICE looks good (I'm really careful now on this file, so, I'm 100%
sure ;))
DISCLAIMER exists
Regards
JB
On 02/01/2016 11:32 PM, Andreas Kotes wrote:
Hello esteemed PPMCs,
is there something you need for Apache Wave to get some more traction on
this m
MCs,
>
> is there something you need for Apache Wave to get some more traction on
> this mailinglist?
>
> Right now this is kinda blocking here, while we're toiling along inside
> the project ;)
>
> Please consider investing a modest amount of time to get this through
Hello esteemed PPMCs,
is there something you need for Apache Wave to get some more traction on
this mailinglist?
Right now this is kinda blocking here, while we're toiling along inside
the project ;)
Please consider investing a modest amount of time to get this through
the door.
The r
x27;s heart a little :-)
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Release contents look good, with the notes from Justin.
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM Ali Lown wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Wave has just completed its
n your master
> branch, so (to break Marvin's heart a little :-)
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Release contents look good, with the notes from Justin.
>
> John
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM Ali Lown wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Wave has just com
nding)
Release contents look good, with the notes from Justin.
John
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM Ali Lown wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wave has just completed its first passing vote, and would like to make
> its first release since joining the incubator in 2010.
>
> The Wave PPMC has vot
Apache Wave release on general@apache?
>
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 3:25 AM Ali Lown wrote:
>
>> Hi Ian,
>>
>> I am not sure about the best way to import this into eclipse, I
>> have always used the CLI tools directly. I have CC'd the dev-list
>> in
Hi Ian
Are there any more issues that hold you from voting on the Apache Wave
release on general@apache?
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 3:25 AM Ali Lown wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> I am not sure about the best way to import this into eclipse, I have
> always used the CLI tools directly. I have
Hi
We still can use one more vote.
Hi,
Can any other IPMC member help out here?
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
gt; from Christian Grobmeier that can be forwarded from the wave-dev list.
>
> My understanding is that I require at least 3 binding +1's from IPMC.
>
> Thanks,
> Ali
>
> On 3 November 2015 at 16:09, Ali Lown wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Wave has just completed its f
Hi all,
I could still do with someone else taking a look at these artifacts.
Currently there is one +1 vote from Justin Mclean, and one +1 vote
from Christian Grobmeier that can be forwarded from the wave-dev list.
My understanding is that I require at least 3 binding +1's from IPMC.
T
Removing them seems reasonable. They are only used as part of a
test-case, which is only accessed if someone is developing using the
hosted editor.
I shall do this as part of the next release.
Ali
On 10 November 2015 at 23:44, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> Do you have the authors permission
Hi,
>> Do you have the authors permission to use and distribute them?
>
> I have no information on the original taker of the photo.
Perhaps these were missed as part of the IP clearance step? [1] As the
provenance is a little unclear I’d suggest they be replaced, but up to you.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi Justin,
>> Are you referring to the screenshots under war/static/? Those are
>> untouched since the migration from Google, so fall under the license
>> from them.
>
> Not the screen shots no but the photos found in here:
> ./src/org/waveprotocol/wave/client/editor/
Hi,
> Are you referring to the screenshots under war/static/? Those are
> untouched since the migration from Google, so fall under the license
> from them.
Not the screen shots no but the photos found in here:
./src/org/waveprotocol/wave/client/editor/harness/public/pics/
Do you
Hi Justin,
Thanks for taking a look at the RC, we will fix these minor points for
the next release.
> I notice there’s a couple of photographs in the source release, I assume you
> have permission from the person who took them to use these? IF so you may
> want to put that in the LICENSE.
Are
Hi Ian,
Perhaps you could provide some more information on exactly what steps
you took to the wave-dev list, where we can try to help you with
getting this to work on your machine, I doubt everyone else on
incubator-general is quite as interested...
Using a different Java version on Windows
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I did try to use the CLI to build it but ran into java issues since
windows seems determined to use java 8 and i can only get java 7 to
run inside eclipse. Getting windows to use an older version of java
seems like a fairly difficult or poorly
Typically speaking, releases should compile. If there are steps required
to make it compile they should be shared.
On Nov 8, 2015 14:33, "Upayavira" wrote:
> Ian,
>
> Please bear in mind that this release vote is to validate the legal
> aspects of the release, not its technical merits. Technical
Ian,
Please bear in mind that this release vote is to validate the legal
aspects of the release, not its technical merits. Technical merits can
be resolved in subsequent releases.
Upayavira
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015, at 02:51 PM, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
Hi Ian,
I am not sure about the best way to import this into eclipse, I have
always used the CLI tools directly. I have CC'd the dev-list in case
they have a better answer for you.
The inability to find ${build.classpath.path}, ${build.macros.path}
suggests that you are missing/failed-to-import/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello,
I'll give it at 0 the moment since I encountered a build issue. I
downloaded the src zip and imported the code into Eclipse Mars (4.50)
with jdk 1.7.0_79 & ANT 1.9.4 but found the following issues:
1)
BUILD FAILED
C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\
e.
>>
>> This could discuss providing feedback on release candidates etc, and
>> point to a separate page describing how to get nightly builds (and the
>> caveats of using them).
>> [That page should not be linked from the main menus]
>>
>> I think that w
these builds are not for the
> general public.
>
> BTW that page has a typo: "Requriements Discussion"
>
>
>> Ali
>>
>> On 3 November 2015 at 11:32, Upayavira wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015, at 11:15 AM, sebb wrote:
&g
Hi,
+1 binding.
Could you please fix the LICENCE Appendix in the next release. The text should
be "Copyright [] [name of copyright owner]” not "Copyright 2013 The Apache
Software Foundation”.
I checked:
- artefact has incubating in name
- signatures and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LI
gt;
> On 3 November 2015 at 11:32, Upayavira wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015, at 11:15 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> The Wave download page
>>>
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/wave/downloads.html
>>>
>>> specifically says that there have
Hi,
Wave has just completed its first passing vote, and would like to make
its first release since joining the incubator in 2010.
The Wave PPMC has voted in favour with 6 binding votes, and 4
non-binding votes from the community.
PPMC vote call:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox
me know if you think it still needs changing.
Ali
On 3 November 2015 at 11:32, Upayavira wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015, at 11:15 AM, sebb wrote:
>> The Wave download page
>>
>> http://incubator.apache.org/wave/downloads.html
>>
>> specificall
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015, at 11:15 AM, sebb wrote:
> The Wave download page
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/wave/downloads.html
>
> specifically says that there have been no releases
>
> However it links to automated builds and an RC in a home directory on
> minotaur.
>
The Wave download page
http://incubator.apache.org/wave/downloads.html
specifically says that there have been no releases
However it links to automated builds and an RC in a home directory on minotaur.
That does not seem right
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:39 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
> > Hi Roman,
> >
> > you might have noticed, that one of the mentors (me) were actively
> > asking for this report. I simply forgot to sign it, which does not
> > happen oft
are always welcome; but its not this podling is out on his
> own. From mentoring activities, I even joined a Google Hangout to
> clarify questions, and releases were reviewed.
>
> When it comes to the situation of this podling, it hasn't changed much.
> I wonder why you think
Agreed.
First speak to wave-dev.
We have had that kind of discussion several times. It did not change to
date, so we should pick it up again.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015, at 21:44, Upayavira wrote:
> Although, I should also make this point directly on wave-dev. I have
> long been quiet there,
; On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Ted Dunning
> > wrote:
> > > Upayavira,
> > >
> > > Mind if I add your comment to the wave report?
> >
> > The report for March has been filed already. I've initialized the wiki
> > template for our April repo
Although, I should also make this point directly on wave-dev. I have
long been quiet there, and it would be unfair for this to arise without
their prior warning.
Upayavira
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015, at 08:42 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> Please do.
>
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015, at 06:54 PM, Ted Dunn
Right.
Brain not functioning apparently. Yes. Adding this to the incubator
report is what I mean.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Ted Dunning
> wrote:
> > Upayavira,
> >
> > Mind if I add your comment to
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Upayavira,
>
> Mind if I add your comment to the wave report?
The report for March has been filed already. I've initialized the wiki
template for our April report.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2015
Wave is not assi
Upayavira,
Mind if I add your comment to the wave report?
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> Apologies for missing the report.
>
> My impression also is that Wave will not, ever, make graduation, and
> should seek an alternative home.
>
> There’s still s
Apologies for missing the report.
My impression also is that Wave will not, ever, make graduation, and
should seek an alternative home.
There’s still some benefit to the project in being associated with
Apache, but I don’t see how it will ever reach a stronger position. From
the discussions
meier<mailto:grobme...@apache.org>
Sent: 3/12/2015 11:39 PM
To: Roman Shaposhnik<mailto:r...@apache.org>;
general@incubator.apache.org<mailto:general@incubator.apache.org>
Cc: Upayavira<mailto:u...@odoko.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Wave community may need our help
Hi Roman,
you might
mentoring activities, I even joined a Google Hangout to
clarify questions, and releases were reviewed.
When it comes to the situation of this podling, it hasn't changed much.
I wonder why you think Wave would turn the corner.
>From time to time I start the retirement discussion at the podl
Hi!
all throughout my tenure I was keeping an eye
on Wave trying to figure out how we can help
that community. The poddling has been incubating
close to 5 years and for a long time they've struggled
with the basics of producing the release and growing
the community beyond its core.
Clean this up from the voting monitor.
This has been superseded by RC4 at the project level anyway...
Sorry for leaving it open for so long. (I may have forgotten it)
Ali
On 15 June 2013 23:24, Ali Lown wrote:
> The Wave community has voted on and approved the proposal to release
> Apach
Hello folks,
I am around the wave project for quite a while. Upayavira is the only
active mentor there and does a great job. Recently there was a lot of
new people showing up and I helped out. Now I asked the project if
they would like me to join as a mentor and they said yes.
Therefore i would
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Michael MacFadden
wrote:
> Joe,
>
> Thanks for your comments. Can you clarify for us the PPMC comment. I think we
> are a bit confused between the concepts of a top level project PMC, the
> incubator IPMC, the PPMC you have mentioned, and piddling mentors. I don'
as a PMC in training, their votes are considered important.
In Wave so far, all committers are also PPMC members, so Ali could have
just labelled folks 'PPMC' instead of 'committer' and Joe's concern
would have been addressed.
Upayavira
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013, at 01:14 AM
On 21 June 2013 00:59, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hi Ali,
>
> Comments inline.
>
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013, at 05:24 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
>
>> The result from the wave-dev vote can be found at:
>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/2
Just one quick question. I notice that you include the bouncy-castle jar in the
distribution.
Have you looked into the need to file an ECCN for crypto?
Regards,
Craig
On Jun 20, 2013, at 5:00 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
>> The Wave
t;> Comments inline.
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013, at 05:24 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
>>
>>> The result from the wave-dev vote can be found at:
>>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201306.mbox/%3CCABRGrVfPOwN3E8N-uScruYbxdezpfZzAJHMp8dN%2BUf
; Hi Ali,
>
> Comments inline.
>
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013, at 05:24 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
>
> > The result from the wave-dev vote can be found at:
> > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201306.mbox/%3CCABRGrVfPOwN3E8N-uScruYbxdezpfZzAJHMp8dN%2BUfpF
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> The Wave community has voted on and approved the proposal to release
> Apache Wave 0.4 (incubating) based on RC3.
>
> This will be the initial incubator release for Wave.
>
> The proposal for release can be found
Hi Ali,
Comments inline.
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013, at 05:24 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> The result from the wave-dev vote can be found at:
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201306.mbox/%3CCABRGrVfPOwN3E8N-uScruYbxdezpfZzAJHMp8dN%2BUfpF6s%2BDGw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
Hi Ali,
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013, at 03:06 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> The voting period has now passed, and we have received no votes from
> anyone
> here :(
Sorry, folks are too busy debating the problems of the Incubator to take
time to review Incubator releases. ;-)
I'll try to take a look tonight a
, since it
> will dictate how Wave's releases look in the future.
>
> Thanks,
> Ali
> On 15 Jun 2013 23:24, "Ali Lown" wrote:
>
>> The Wave community has voted on and approved the proposal to release
>> Apache Wave 0.4 (incubating) based on RC3.
>>
&g
e.
Thanks,
Ali
On 15 Jun 2013 23:24, "Ali Lown" wrote:
> The Wave community has voted on and approved the proposal to release
> Apache Wave 0.4 (incubating) based on RC3.
>
> This will be the initial incubator release for Wave.
>
> The proposal for release can be fou
The Wave community has voted on and approved the proposal to release
Apache Wave 0.4 (incubating) based on RC3.
This will be the initial incubator release for Wave.
The proposal for release can be found at:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201306.mbox
Wave is scheduled to report this month; but, there is no report
completed in the wiki. If possible, please add your report to the
wiki [1] before the end of Friday.
[1]: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2013
-
To
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> I have been pointing out that the ability to release correctly is what
> the incubator PMC wants to see, rather than a technically valid or
> useful release. That said, a release that is full of holes might
> actually have the counter-intuit
This is precisely what is currently being discussed. In fact, we have a
new volunteer (Angus Turner) who is helping get things in order, with
large header correcting patches.
I have been pointing out that the ability to release correctly is what
the incubator PMC wants to see, rather than a techni
Is there anything that could be released, even in alpha/beta form? Code
completeness or maturity is not a barrier to graduation so long as the
community can demonstrate an understanding of the Apache release process. IMO,
it is best to get early, alpha releases out on a regular basis. You don
checked and signed off now.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
> From: Dan Haywood
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: isis-...@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 9:31 AM
> Subject: Re: Etch, Isis, NPanday and Wave missing reports
>
>
Hi Jukka,
I've just added a report for Isis this morning. Still needs signing off by
one of our mentors.
Thx
Dan
~~~
On 8 September 2012 09:50, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please report ASAP so there's enough time for review.
>
> If you won't have the report ready by tomorrow, let us
Taking a look at it
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Dan Haywood
wrote:
> Hi Jukka,
> I've just added a report for Isis this morning. Still needs signing off by
> one of our mentors.
> Thx
> Dan
> ~~~
>
> On 8 September 2012 09:50, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please report ASAP
Sorry for the delay. I added the report to
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2012 and hope it is still in
time for the September board meeting. As some of us was on vacation we
could't create the report.
Thanks
Michael
2012/9/9 Martijn Dashorst :
> I don't think a report for Etch is comin
On 08/09/2012, at 6:50 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> NPanday, since you missed already the August report, it would be
> really good if we could have a status update now.
I've added something now, sorry about that.
Was there something wrong with Marvin this month? I had a note to follow up
once I
I don't think a report for Etch is coming this month. Please
reschedule for next month.
Martijn
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please report ASAP so there's enough time for review.
>
> If you won't have the report ready by tomorrow, let us know so we can
> postpo
Hi,
Please report ASAP so there's enough time for review.
If you won't have the report ready by tomorrow, let us know so we can
postpone the report to next month.
NPanday, since you missed already the August report, it would be
really good if we could have a status update now. From the list
arch
We have discussed these two topics (committers and releases) around the
time of this report, but did not update the report to note this.
I hope the conversation will continue, and that wave will have more to
report for its next report.
Upayavira
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012, at 01:32 PM, Ross Gardler
The Wave project, in the main, seems to be doing OK. Mailing list
traffic is healthy, commits are happening and there seems to be good
diversity.
What is missing is new committers (none voted in since entering the
incubator) and a release (none made yet). However the report does not
address these
r 10, 2012, at 03:25 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [sending to general@. Wave people, feel free to forward to wave-dev@]
>
> The only podling report still missing from the wiki page [1] is the
> one from Wave. It would be great if the Wave PPMC could come up with a
> repor
Hi,
[sending to general@. Wave people, feel free to forward to wave-dev@]
The only podling report still missing from the wiki page [1] is the
one from Wave. It would be great if the Wave PPMC could come up with a
report latest on Monday (so we still have some time for review).
Otherwise please
here is no harm done
>
> I agree, just one minor thing, they say "we will commit all patches
> into the main tree" but it's the Wave PMC who's in control of
> accepting those patches or not. "We will submit all patch
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
>...This is now the site:
>
> http://www.fundwiab.com
>
> I think this is pretty fine and there is no harm done
I agree, just one minor thing, they say "we will commit all patches
into the main tree" but i
Weird ... that was posted to my output queue on Monday. :-( No big deal.
Just a clarification that Wave wasn't missing.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For addit
Most of the general discussion on the Incubator list over the past month was
how to improve the usability of the Incubator web-site.
S4 (Simple Scalable Streaming System) -- a general-purpose, distributed,
scalable, partially fault-tolerant, pluggable platform that allows
programmers to easily dev
I would say it does not mean anything.
Projects mailinglist after incubation are for example:
d...@wave.apache.org
While incubation it might be:
wave-...@incubator.apache.org
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> So what does it mean when a committers userid - mine i
So what does it mean when a committers userid - mine is w...@apache.org == a
project name Apache Wave?
Not that I have noticed any spam coming to me.
Regards,
Dave
On Aug 19, 2011, at 8:42 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> thanks. I have updated the status page for wave t
were
>> present. So there's something else going on.
>
> I found it. In the svn asf-authorization-template
> the wave entry was missing one part of its config:
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Set+Up+Repository
> it was missing the third entry.
>
> Not
1 - 100 of 342 matches
Mail list logo
