On 7/31/06, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/31/06, sophitia que <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/31/06, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Is it intended that either of the two mentions (specifically just
> > the URL) satisfy this requirement? I.e., that somet
On 7/31/06, sophitia que <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/31/06, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Is it intended that either of the two mentions (specifically just
> the URL) satisfy this requirement? I.e., that something like this
> be sufficient on a third party web page that disc
On 7/31/06, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it intended that either of the two mentions (specifically just
the URL) satisfy this requirement? I.e., that something like this
be sufficient on a third party web page that discusses the project:
http://incubator.apache.org/podling-n
On Jul 31, 2006, at 2:00 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Is it intended that either of the two mentions (specifically just
the URL) satisfy this requirement? I.e., that something like this
be sufficient on a third party web page that discusses the project:
http://incubator.apache.org/podling-name"
The Naming section of the Branding Guidelines states (among other
things) that
...podling MUST be referred to as Apache "Podling-Name" AND mention
that the project is under Incubation. Suitable mentions include:
* Inclusion of the http://incubator.apache.org/"podling-name"; URL
* Apache
