On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Brian Behlendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
>> In particular, log4net is built using GPL-licensed Nant, is that a
>> problem from the foundation's point of view?
>
> It's not a problem. (An aside - let me get this straight - someone
> to
> > what is the foundation's position on distributing code
> which depends
> > on the following environments?
>
> > - Mono 1.0 (GPL)
> > - Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 & 1.1 & Compact Framework 1.0 (Closed
> Source)
> > - Microsoft SSCLI 1.0 (Shared Source)
>
> How does that differ from code
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Nicko Cadell wrote:
The release package includes project files for Microsoft
Visual Studio
.NET, however this is not a dependency.
Does this mean these are files copied from (perhaps modified,
perhaps not) the Microsoft product, which originally carried
a Microsoft copyright?
> > The release package includes project files for Microsoft
> Visual Studio
> > .NET, however this is not a dependency.
>
> Does this mean these are files copied from (perhaps modified,
> perhaps not) the Microsoft product, which originally carried
> a Microsoft copyright? Or are these fre
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote:
I am quite embarrassed to ask but what is the foundation's position on
distributing code which depends on the following environments?
- Mono 1.0 (GPL)
- Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 & 1.1 & Compact Framework 1.0 (Closed Source)
- Microsoft SSCLI
> what is the foundation's position on distributing code
> which depends on the following environments?
> - Mono 1.0 (GPL)
> - Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 & 1.1 & Compact Framework 1.0 (Closed
Source)
> - Microsoft SSCLI 1.0 (Shared Source)
How does that differ from code that depends upon Java,
Ceki,
Am not assuming "higher authority"...as a peer, i don't see any
problems, as you don't have their code in our CVS/SVN and release
artifacts.
-- dims
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 15:22:51 +0100, Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am quite embarrassed to ask but what is the foundation's p
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
Nicko Cadell has compiled a list [1] of additional log4net dependencies.
Could someone of a higher authority confirm that they are OK? In
particular, log4net is built using GPL-licensed Nant, is that a problem
from the foundation's point of view?
I obviously don't speak with an
I am quite embarrassed to ask but what is the foundation's position on
distributing code which depends on the following environments?
- Mono 1.0 (GPL)
- Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 & 1.1 & Compact Framework 1.0 (Closed Source)
- Microsoft SSCLI 1.0 (Shared Source)
It seems very similar to the si
