This has been discussed on various lists, most recently on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] under the subject "Short Apache license for
source files".
In short: using the short license has never been authorized
by the board, and as every other ASF project has always
done, put the entire license on the top of eve
The problem is rather that there are still people who think that the
short licence is ok. What I long for is a definitive statement (or a
reference to it) from an Apache member with his Apache hat on about this
topic. I have followed a lot of discussions but never found such a
statement. Maybe I ju
Send a patch! :)
-aaron
On Monday, February 17, 2003, at 06:40 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I wonder when this is finally going to be hammered into stone somewhere
on the Apache website. Sorry, couldn't resist.
On 17.02.2003 15:29:41 Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 07:58
I wonder when this is finally going to be hammered into stone somewhere
on the Apache website. Sorry, couldn't resist.
On 17.02.2003 15:29:41 Aaron Bannert wrote:
>
> On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 07:58 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Index: BCELProxyGeneratorTestCase.java
> > ==
On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 07:58 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Index: BCELProxyGeneratorTestCase.java
===
/*
* Copyright (C) The Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved.
*
* This software is published und
