On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 08:00:43AM -0800, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Mar 6, 2013, at 7:09 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> >I believe the change represents current IPMC consensus but it'd be
> >nice
> >if the change documented the rationale for the policy as well (at
> >least
> >in th
Hi Daniel,
On Mar 6, 2013, at 7:09 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
I believe the change represents current IPMC consensus but it'd be
nice
if the change documented the rationale for the policy as well (at
least
in the log message).
There is no change to the process, policy, or consensus. The onl
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:24:20PM +0100, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > ...After spamming the private@i.a.o list, and being asked to stop it, I'd
> > like to suggest the following changes to the PPMC guide...
>
> +1, and +1 to Daniels com
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> ...After spamming the private@i.a.o list, and being asked to stop it, I'd
> like to suggest the following changes to the PPMC guide...
+1, and +1 to Daniels comment, you could point to the private@ thread
where this was discussed, by Message-
I believe the change represents current IPMC consensus but it'd be nice
if the change documented the rationale for the policy as well (at least
in the log message).
Daniel
(last week I ran into a 10 years old change that didn't have any
justification anywhere)
Chip Childers wrote on Wed, Mar 06,
Hi all,
After spamming the private@i.a.o list, and being asked to stop it, I'd
like to suggest the following changes to the PPMC guide:
Index: content/guides/ppmc.xml
===
--- content/guides/ppmc.xml (revision 1453351)
+++ content/gu
