Jim and I discussed it a bit since it came in "right around" the 48
hour limit (and the huge Incubator report is definitely sensitive to
that timing restriction). Since the report will effectively have a
couple days for people to review it, then it seemed fine, and I told
Jim that I'd accept it (as
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 9/17/07, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This was past our 48hour cutoff and, as is usually the case
>> for the Incubator reports, pretty long. You are the shep for
>> the Incubator this month. I am leaning towards not accepting
>> this but if, as shepherd,
On 9/17/07, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This was past our 48hour cutoff and, as is usually the case
> for the Incubator reports, pretty long. You are the shep for
> the Incubator this month. I am leaning towards not accepting
> this but if, as shepherd, you feel comfortable with it
>
Ben Hyde wrote:
> On Sep 17, 2007, at 7:31 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> Why on the private list? Why wouldn't a discussion like that be part
>> of the public dev list?
>
> My choice, possibly wrong. That said, I'd be surprised if any choice to
> redouble or shelf would be made without a round of disc
On Sep 17, 2007, at 7:31 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
Why on the private list? Why wouldn't a discussion like that be part
of the public dev list?
My choice, possibly wrong. That said, I'd be surprised if any choice
to redouble or shelf would be made without a round of discussion in
the public li
Why on the private list? Why wouldn't a discussion like that be part
of the public dev list?
On 9/17/07, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 17, 2007, at 9:31 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > === TripleSoup ===
> >
> > Did not report.
>
> Ouch, sorry. .
>
> > TripleSoup entered Incubation
On Sep 17, 2007, at 9:31 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
=== TripleSoup ===
Did not report.
Ouch, sorry. .
TripleSoup entered Incubation in February 2007.
TripleSoup is intended to provide an RDF store, tooling to work
with that
database, and a REST web interface to talk to that database using
Greg,
This was past our 48hour cutoff and, as is usually the case
for the Incubator reports, pretty long. You are the shep for
the Incubator this month. I am leaning towards not accepting
this but if, as shepherd, you feel comfortable with it
being added, I will defer to your judgement.
On Sep 1
The Incubator enjoyed another nice quiet month. Busy, but no confliects or
problems. A few more new PMC Members were added, and a more couple people
stepped up as Mentors. The recommendation to have at least 3 Mentors per
project, although not universally implemented, appears to be having the
de
