On Jun 25, 2007, at 4:53 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
I just finished
a sweep through our sources and updated those that still needed
it. The record of the changes is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-457
So, does this mean that there's files in any of the tarballs
Hi,
On 6/22/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Even issues raised by board/IPMC have been addressed quickly and
sufficiently. (The issue with two-classes of CTR and RTC committers is
resolved, while The "Committers in italics do not have a signed Contributor
License Agreement o
Leo Simons wrote:
On Jun 23, 2007, at 10:06 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
I also believe/hope the status file might need an update or perhaps two:
In progress
Check and make sure that the files that have been donated have
been updated to reflect the new ASF copyrig
On Jun 23, 2007, at 10:06 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
I also believe/hope the status file might need an update or
perhaps two:
In progress
Check and make sure that the files that have been donated have
been updated to reflect the new ASF copyright.
I'd hope that
Leo Simons wrote:
On Jun 22, 2007, at 9:55 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I think the community, as-is, can manage itself for now.
...
I believe stdcxx is a nice, small,
healthy little community doing what the committers are interested in -
producing a world-class STL implementation under the AL
On Jun 22, 2007, at 9:55 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I think the community, as-is, can manage itself for now.
...
I believe stdcxx is a nice, small,
healthy little community doing what the committers are interested in -
producing a world-class STL implementation under the ALv2 with our
communi
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[...]
things are as quiet as expected for a mature implementation of
a reference standard.
Any concern that because of the maturity, it could stagnate and lose community?
Not at this time. Because it is widely d
On 6/21/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What effect do you believe GPLv3 will have, now that the FSF is acknowledging
that GPL projects may freely take advantage of Apache Licensed code?
If any, it might spur some people who would have considered libstdc++
to now look at what we
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
>> diversity is increasing (we wish it were broader, but I suspect this
>> project with the visibility of full ASF status will attract additional
>> committers who might have been hedging their bets on whether or not
>> the project would survi
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> diversity is increasing (we wish it were broader, but I suspect this
> project with the visibility of full ASF status will attract additional
> committers who might have been hedging their bets on whether or not
> the project would survive incubation.)
What effect do
[How's that for optimism? please not corrected stdcxx-dev list address]
I'm including general in this thread to give the incubator community
some small insight into stdcxx's efforts and next steps to graduate.
As far as I can see there are no remaining obstacles.
http://incubator.apache.org/s
I'm including general in this thread to give the incubator community
some small insight into stdcxx's efforts and next steps to graduate.
As far as I can see there are no remaining obstacles.
http://incubator.apache.org/stdcxx/
is of a caliber higher than expected in open source efforts, the
12 matches
Mail list logo
