Ok, just wanted to make sure...
Why isn't my memory updated with "svn commit" ?? Yeah, the CCLA was updated
in 2005 with the appendix to make the grant specific.
Never mind...
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Craig Russell
wrote:
> Hi Niclas,
>
> The CCLA is sufficient as a code grant for new
In my experience, the CCLA is too 'strong' for many corporate types since
it delegates decision making waaay down in the pecking order with no
recourse.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Craig Russell
wrote:
> Hi Niclas,
>
> The CCLA is sufficient as a code grant for new code bases coming into
Hi Niclas,
The CCLA is sufficient as a code grant for new code bases coming into Apache.
Of course, committers must submit their own ICLA as well.
Why do you consider the CCLA a ‘weak’ agreement?
Craig
> On Nov 29, 2016, at 8:04 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>
> I am seeing on
> http://incubator
Hi Niclas,
> On Nov 29, 2016, at 8:04 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>
> I am seeing on
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-import-code-dump
> that the CCLA is adequate for new codebases coming in via the Incubator. Is
> that really the case? It seems to me to be a rather 'weak'
I am seeing on
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-import-code-dump
that the CCLA is adequate for new codebases coming in via the Incubator. Is
that really the case? It seems to me to be a rather 'weak' agreement for
something that substantial.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Softwa
