Leo Simons wrote:
> I have also posted detailed instructions to the geronimo list
> describing how to get the geronimo site built and committed
>
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pache.org&msgNo=4475
> I maintain that its best if the geronimo people manage their
> own site
Ag
I have also posted detailed instructions to the geronimo list
describing how to get the geronimo site built and committed in
the appropriate location:
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=4475
None of the committers felt like answering at the time :/
I maintain that its best
> One of the things that happened when we updated the main incubator
> site is that it blew away the project site(s).
OK, the README file in the incubator CVS has the instructions:
Do not use the "incubator" CVS module for project docs,
but the module of the specific project.
Check-in the
Looks like Leo posted instructions to CVS while I was away. Reading now ...
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One of the things that happened when we updated the main incubator
site is
that it blew away the project site(s). What do we want to tell a
project to
do about its site. How should Geronimo link a project site into what
is now
their STATUS page?
Obviously, they can just "do it", but is there
Nicola Ken,
>From Geronimo:
> I remember when the Geronimo project had a web site at Apache.
> What are the chances that we're going to get that thing back
> up and running before ApacheCon?
> If, for example, we stirred up a lot of attention to the project
> at the Con, I can imagine the frustr
