Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 09:02:59 +0200
Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm the moderator there, and I didn't see your mail.
I apologise for missing it, it was not intentional. Sorry.
Okay, then can the config of the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
be changed? When? Who? How
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 09:02:59 +0200
Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm the moderator there, and I didn't see your mail.
> I apologise for missing it, it was not intentional. Sorry.
Okay, then can the config of the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
be changed? When? Who? How?
---
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Roy,
Please note that "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
list is suffering the same disease.
I said this before at that mailing list. Noone responded.
It (nonfeasance) really humiliated me.
I'm the moderator there, and I didn't see your mail.
I apologise for missing it, it was not intent
> Lists without "Reply-To" Header ...
If the PMC wants the list properties changed, perhaps because of requests
from the list users, they can submit a request to have the list
reconfigured.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:44:05 -0400
(Subject: RE: technology sucks)
"Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your comment
> (http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=41)
> was about a Reply-To header.
Oh, yes. yes.
*** NOTE *** Lists witho
> Please note that "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> list is suffering the same disease.
It looks to me that projects@ has both an owner and a moderator (although it
could use more moderators).
Your comment
(http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
he.org&msgNo=41) was about a Reply-To header.
Roy,
Please note that "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
list is suffering the same disease.
I said this before at that mailing list. Noone responded.
It (nonfeasance) really humiliated me.
__ Tetsuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 16:50:26 -0700
(Subject: technology sucks)
"Roy T. Fielding" <[EM
