Re: please follow through to publish doc changes

2013-10-30 Thread Kevin Minder
This was apparently caused by me trying to clean up the Knox status. I will review the procedures. I was nievly expecting a svnpubsub to publish the site and I was wondering why it wasn't. I see now that I missed step #9 here http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html Apologies On 10/2

Re: please follow through to publish doc changes

2013-10-29 Thread Larry McCay
Jake, thank you for taking care of that! I didn't see anything on the Knox mailing list - should I have? Can you tell me exactly what was fixed and where? We will be sure to investigate what went wrong and document the proper procedure going forward. Is there anything that is outstanding that is

Re: please follow through to publish doc changes

2013-10-29 Thread Jake Farrell
I went ahead and fixed the missing tag Knox had and this should resolve the issue you saw David. I also have cleaned up some of the issues seen on the voter status page and I just saw that Olivier Lamy committed the batchee.xml missing project status page (Thanks Olivier). All changes are publishe

Re: please follow through to publish doc changes

2013-10-29 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 5:12 PM, David Crossley wrote: > This continues to be a problem. It is now exacerbated > because someone has made source content errors (knox) > but because people do not bother to try to publish > changes, these errors are not noticed or attended to. > > It is preventing

Re: please follow through to publish doc changes

2013-10-29 Thread David Crossley
David Crossley wrote: > > The problem seems to be getting worse. Some people make > source changes to docs, but then do not follow through > to publish those changes via the CMS. Then other changes > bank up behind the logjam. > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html This continues to

Re: please follow through to publish doc changes

2013-06-20 Thread David Crossley
Mattmann, Chris A (398J) wrote: > Hi David, > > That's my bad. Having not published the site using the CMS since we > switched over, I knew I had to read the docs again but hadn't. I > fully intended to though. Not only you. It is a common holdup. There are various routes for editing, as explain

Re: please follow through to publish doc changes

2013-06-20 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
Hi David, That's my bad. Having not published the site using the CMS since we switched over, I knew I had to read the docs again but hadn't. I fully intended to though. Anyways, sorry. Cheers, Chris ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior