sebb wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> >> It is the case that Initial Committers are eligible to serve on the PPMC,
> >> though not all choose to do so.
> >>
> >> Also, it is apparently a recommendation that invited committers be invited
> >> to the PPMC, but it doesn
gt; -Original Message-
>> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 03:52
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: incubator is a single group
>>
>> [ ... ]
>>
>> Is this an alternative?
>> Aren
ssible while keeping it simple.
-David
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 03:52
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: incubator is a single group
>
> [ ... ]
>
> Is this an alternative?
&g
ve on the PPMC.
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 03:52
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: incubator is a single group
[ ... ]
Is this an alternative?
Aren't podling committers the same as PP
On 12 November 2011 06:54, David Crossley wrote:
> William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>> >
>> >I *suggest* that incubator change the procedure such that all
>> >committers (or at least all committers within a single LDAP
>> >group) have access to all incubator areas and that new
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> >
> >I *suggest* that incubator change the procedure such that all
> >committers (or at least all committers within a single LDAP
> >group) have access to all incubator areas and that new people
> >simply be requested to only commit within areas
On 11/11/2011 1:58 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I *suggest* that incubator change the procedure such that all
committers (or at least all committers within a single LDAP
group) have access to all incubator areas and that new people
simply be requested to only commit within areas for which they
hav
same here, big +1.
Tommaso
2011/11/11 Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Hi guys,
>
> I second Chris on that point.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 11/11/2011 04:37 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>
>> Hi Roy,
>>
>> I would be super +1 for this. I think it would really help people out, and
>> let those mentor
Hi guys,
I second Chris on that point.
Regards
JB
On 11/11/2011 04:37 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Roy,
I would be super +1 for this. I think it would really help people out, and
let those mentoring the podlings and those doing the work manage
the addition/removal of people to their
Hi Roy,
I would be super +1 for this. I think it would really help people out, and
let those mentoring the podlings and those doing the work manage
the addition/removal of people to their PPMCs. It would also hopefully
ease the burden on the PMC chairs and (hopefully) simplify infra.
Thanks fo
incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: incubator is a single group
On 11 November 2011 07:58, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> It has come to my attention that we are wasting resources and
> time trying to manage separate committer lists within infra for
> every podling. That i
On 11 November 2011 07:58, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> It has come to my attention that we are wasting resources and
> time trying to manage separate committer lists within infra for
> every podling. That is something that we can effectively manage
> once a TLP has become self-governin
12 matches
Mail list logo
