On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 6:31 PM, jan i wrote:
> ...So accepting a podling is a procedural vote, maybe that the word we should
> add to http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#vote...
Yeah or maybe you can be even more precise and add "procedural as per
http://www.apache.org/foundation/vot
On 3 December 2014 at 18:25, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 6:17 PM, jan i wrote:
> > ...Personally I see it as any number of +1 and no -1, but again I still
> cannot
> > find the documentation...
>
> It's at http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>
So accepting a pod
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 6:17 PM, jan i wrote:
> ...Personally I see it as any number of +1 and no -1, but again I still cannot
> find the documentation...
It's at http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
-Bertrand
-
To unsub
On 2 December 2014 at 18:32, Matt Franklin wrote:
> On Tue Dec 02 2014 at 12:25:33 PM Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>
> > Apache PMCs, including the incubator PMC, operate by consensus except
> > in a very small number of enumerated exceptional cases. So, the vote,
> > I think, is a test of consensu
On 2 December 2014 at 18:24, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Apache PMCs, including the incubator PMC, operate by consensus except
> in a very small number of enumerated exceptional cases. So, the vote,
> I think, is a test of consensus. -1 votes block consensus until
> discussed to 0. There's no minim
On Tue Dec 02 2014 at 12:25:33 PM Benson Margulies
wrote:
> Apache PMCs, including the incubator PMC, operate by consensus except
> in a very small number of enumerated exceptional cases. So, the vote,
> I think, is a test of consensus. -1 votes block consensus until
> discussed to 0. There's no
Apache PMCs, including the incubator PMC, operate by consensus except
in a very small number of enumerated exceptional cases. So, the vote,
I think, is a test of consensus. -1 votes block consensus until
discussed to 0. There's no minimum number of +1 votes.
I am always prepared to be corrected.
On 12 August 2014 08:52, jan i wrote:
> On 12 August 2014 08:53, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>
> Documents are source code written in a natural language :-)
>
>
and without any tests.
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it
On 12 August 2014 08:53, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:32 AM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> >> ...if a podling/TLP were to receive a donation of
> >> documentation from a third party, should that go
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:32 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>> ...if a podling/TLP were to receive a donation of
>> documentation from a third party, should that go through the same reviews
>> as source code donations?...
>
> IMO ye
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:32 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> ...if a podling/TLP were to receive a donation of
> documentation from a third party, should that go through the same reviews
> as source code donations?...
IMO yes.
Flex did something like that in
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearan
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 23:30, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> ant elder wrote:
>
>> See:
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Approval+of+Pr
> oposal+by+Sponsor
>
> There is an uncorrected defect in that process document. It says, in part,
> that the sponsoring PMC must provide
thanks
On Aug 25, 2006, at 6:11 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 8/24/06, Susanne Lefvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,
hi Susanne
I've been looking at the apache ftp server as a solution for one of
my projects. It looks really promising but I would like to get my
hands on more
On 8/24/06, Susanne Lefvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,
hi Susanne
I've been looking at the apache ftp server as a solution for one of
my projects. It looks really promising but I would like to get my
hands on more documentation. Do you know if there's more info out
there apart from
On 7/5/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
what i came to pull together the material for the proposal template, i
found that it didn't really fit into the annotation template format
originally conceived. so, here is a first draft of a guide for proposals
containing a template. i
15 matches
Mail list logo
