Re: cvs commit: incubator-altrmi/lib/optional excalibur-lifecycle-1.0.jar

2003-03-19 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Paul Hammant wrote, On 19/03/2003 18.16: Do jars in CVS suck? They do. Does downloading all that stuff suck. Sure it does. [EMAIL PROTECTED] already has working codebases that give a solution to this problem to choose from. What we need is to set up the infrastructure. Or switch to Maven. Or use

Re: cvs commit: incubator-altrmi/lib/optional excalibur-lifecycle-1.0.jar

2003-03-19 Thread Paul Hammant
> Do jars in CVS suck? They do. > Does downloading all that stuff suck. Sure it does. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] already has working codebases that give a solution > to this problem to choose from. What we need is to set up the > infrastructure. Or switch to Maven. - Paul _

Re: cvs commit: incubator-altrmi/lib/optional excalibur-lifecycle-1.0.jar

2003-03-19 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Aaron Bannert wrote, On 19/03/2003 16.31: On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 11:47 PM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: If they are the product of another project, then the developer would just download and build/install that other project. Hmmm, so here start the problems. A Java project can have a lot of

Re: cvs commit: incubator-altrmi/lib/optional excalibur-lifecycle-1.0.jar

2003-03-19 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 11:47 PM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: If they are the product of another project, then the developer would just download and build/install that other project. Hmmm, so here start the problems. A Java project can have a lot of dependencies, and making all developers dow

Re: cvs commit: incubator-altrmi/lib/optional excalibur-lifecycle-1.0.jar

2003-03-18 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Aaron Bannert wrote, On 17/03/2003 8.25: On Saturday, March 15, 2003, at 02:50 PM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Anyway, I'm curious: since I develop only java and I don't use other languages since the universtity (so take this question with the same grain of salt ;-) , what would have you thought

Re: cvs commit: incubator-altrmi/lib/optional excalibur-lifecycle-1.0.jar

2003-03-18 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Scott Cantor wrote, On 16/03/2003 2.20: ... Not having /usr/lib, library versioning, etc. is among the most obnoxious things about Java, IMHO. *sigh* But we're getting there :-D -- Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussion

Re: cvs commit: incubator-altrmi/lib/optional excalibur-lifecycle-1.0.jar

2003-03-16 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Saturday, March 15, 2003, at 02:50 PM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Anyway, I'm curious: since I develop only java and I don't use other languages since the universtity (so take this question with the same grain of salt ;-) , what would have you thought could have been done instead of putting t

Re: cvs commit: incubator-altrmi/lib/optional excalibur-lifecycle-1.0.jar

2003-03-15 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Aaron Bannert wrote, On 15/03/2003 22.37: I don't claim to be a Java expert, so take what I say with a grain of salt, but why are jars being checked into CVS? *sigh* this is a thing that is haunting java for quite some time now. The fact is that for compilation we need these libraries to be presen

Re: cvs commit: incubator-altrmi/lib/optional excalibur-lifecycle-1.0.jar

2003-03-15 Thread Aaron Bannert
I don't claim to be a Java expert, so take what I say with a grain of salt, but why are jars being checked into CVS? -aaron On Friday, March 14, 2003, at 06:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: leif2003/03/14 18:36:31 Added: lib/optional excalibur-lifecycle-1.0.jar Log: Updated t