And this issue brought up that both podling.a.o and podling.i.a.o started
working at some point and a large unrelated branding issue.
I've responded to the infra ticket, my hope is that they move forward on it
at this point.
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 8:14 AM Daniel Dekany wrote:
> I'm managing mo
I'm managing most of the transition to the ASF infrastructure on
FreeMarker's side, so let me answer. My intent was that until the
project manages to graduate, freemarker.org will continue to be the
"official" and only FreeMarker homepage (as it is for 10 years or so),
only the content comes from t
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 6:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> ...Can we move freemarker forward to not impede them?..
I'm not sure what you are asking, can you clarify?
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@inc
I saw no response to this. Can we move freemarker forward to not impede
them?
On Jan 7, 2016 07:44, "John D. Ament" wrote:
> So... I stumbled upon this as every time I send someone a link to
> freemarker, we get bounced all over the place (I've been a long time
> freemarker user).
>
> Where do t
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:18 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>
> >> > Attached a patch to:
> >> > 1. change from poding.i.a.o to poding.a.o
> >> > 2. Require the incubator logo and that it be prominent
>
> Thanks, Niall.
>
> For the time being
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
>> > Attached a patch to:
>> > 1. change from poding.i.a.o to poding.a.o
>> > 2. Require the incubator logo and that it be prominent
Thanks, Niall.
For the time being, I'm -1 and going to play devil's advocate, but I'm willing
to be persuad
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>
> > Attached a patch to:
> > 1. change from poding.i.a.o to poding.a.o
> > 2. Require the incubator logo and that it be prominent
>
> Thanks, Niall. However, the general@incubato
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> Attached a patch to:
> 1. change from poding.i.a.o to poding.a.o
> 2. Require the incubator logo and that it be prominent
Thanks, Niall. However, the general@incubator list is configured to
strip attachments, so the patch didn't arrive.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>
> > As Rob said, if they're following the other branding requirements, then
> do
> > we need to continue enforcing the subdomain requirement?
>
> Well, I just looked[1] and many p
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> As Rob said, if they're following the other branding requirements, then do
> we need to continue enforcing the subdomain requirement?
Well, I just looked[1] and many podling websites aren't following the branding
requirements. And some b
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Sergio Fernández
> wrote:
> > Well, the transition is not that hard if:
> >
> > a) during incubation podling.a.o redirects (302/307) to podling.i.a.o
> >
> > b) after graduation podling.i.a.o redirects (301)
+1
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Sergio Fernández
> wrote:
> > Well, the transition is not that hard if:
> >
> > a) during incubation podling.a.o redirects (302/307) to podling.i.a.o
> >
> > b) after graduation podling.i.a.o redirects (
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> Well, the transition is not that hard if:
>
> a) during incubation podling.a.o redirects (302/307) to podling.i.a.o
>
> b) after graduation podling.i.a.o redirects (301) to podling.a.o
>
> right?
Discussion has quieted down. I plan to cla
Yes, INFRA arguments are completely valid. But rather than the DNS
resolution of the domains, I think Marvin was asking how domains are
handled at the HTTP level.
Niall
Thanks for digging up the reference
I knew INFRA had made the change for a reason but couldn't remember the
reasoning
Rob
On 0
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Rob Vesse wrote:
> I seem to remember that INFRA used to do redirects but decided to stop
> doing them because it made the transition to TLP easier for podlings post
> graduation because their "final" URL was active from as soon as they start
> (assuming they don't
Niall
Thanks for digging up the reference
I knew INFRA had made the change for a reason but couldn't remember the
reasoning
Rob
On 01/12/2015 16:18, "Niall Pemberton" wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey
>wrote:
>
>> Greets,
>>
>> It seems that podling websites are availab
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> Greets,
>
> It seems that podling websites are available at both these URL patterns:
>
> http://podling.incubator.apache.org
> http://podling.apache.org
>
> See for example:
>
> http://systemml.apache.org/
> http://systemml.incubato
Well, the transition is not that hard if:
a) during incubation podling.a.o redirects (302/307) to podling.i.a.o
b) after graduation podling.i.a.o redirects (301) to podling.a.o
right?
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Rob Vesse wrote:
> I seem to remember that INFRA used to do redirects but d
I seem to remember that INFRA used to do redirects but decided to stop
doing them because it made the transition to TLP easier for podlings post
graduation because their "final" URL was active from as soon as they start
(assuming they don't name change during incubation)
Pretty much any of the cur
They used to have a redirects. But you' re right, looks like not anymore...
So we should ask INFRA to get a 307 resolving the TLP domains.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> Greets,
>
> It seems that podling websites are available at both these URL patterns:
>
> http://po
20 matches
Mail list logo
