>
>
> What I don't get is why would anyone want to keep the name if there
> are potential overlaps or troubles ahead?
My thoughts exactly.
>
> I mean, there are probably better (coding) and harder (releasing,
> graduating) things to do than getting stuck about the name.
> Why don't you (as a pod
El mié, 13-05-2009 a las 00:33 +0200, Emmanuel Lecharny escribió:
> Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> >> JSecurity was deemed as a potential naming conflict risk (much in the same
> >> way Ki is now), so we dropped it, and finally came to a vote to change the
> >> name to Ki. But this resolution took over
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
> ...if the Incubator says "the Ki podling
> must change its name", then fine, we'll be happy to do so, but most of us
> didn't want to spend the effort worrying about it unless necessary
If that can help, I'm happy to start a vote here s
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
JSecurity was deemed as a potential naming conflict risk (much in the same
way Ki is now), so we dropped it, and finally came to a vote to change the
name to Ki. But this resolution took over 4 or 5 months to finally come to
a favorable vote, so we didn't want to go throu
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
> How do you check to ensure that the name is actually usable? We did a lot
> of due diligence on Ki, checked USPTO searches for patents/trademarks on Ki
> and found not a single result, and performed lots of google searching and
> still we'r
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 22:58, Les Hazlewood wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Bernd Fondermann <
> bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> What I don't get is why would anyone want to keep the name if there
>> are potential overlaps or troubles ahead?
>> I mean, there are probably bet
How do you check to ensure that the name is actually usable? We did a lot
of due diligence on Ki, checked USPTO searches for patents/trademarks on Ki
and found not a single result, and performed lots of google searching and
still we're in the current predicament. How does one ever rest assured th
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
> But this resolution took over 4 or 5 months to finally come to
> a favorable vote, so we didn't want to go through that painful process all
> over again,
Suggestion; Allow people to submit suggestions for 1 week, then vote
for 72 hours on t
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Bernd Fondermann <
bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
What I don't get is why would anyone want to keep the name if there
> are potential overlaps or troubles ahead?
> I mean, there are probably better (coding) and harder (releasing,
> graduating) things to do
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> The main point is that you and I disagree on whether FixFlyer Ki and Apache
> Ki are in the same domain.
>
> I have neither broad nor deep experience with securities trading systems,
> but I do know what financial securities are. And I cla
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 21:46, Craig L Russell wrote:
>
> On May 12, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 12, 2009, at 11:12 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On May 12, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>
On May 12, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
On May 12, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 11:12 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera > wrote:
...I'd like so
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera
wrote:
> ...I'd like someone to come up with a concise argument that would allow
> me to
> let this go other than "nope, it's not the same". Otherwise, I feel
> tha
On May 12, 2009, at 11:12 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera > wrote:
...I'd like someone to come up with a concise argument that would
al
On May 12, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera > wrote:
...I'd like someone to come up with a concise argument that would
allow me to
let this go other than "nope, it's not the sam
On May 12, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera
wrote:
...I'd like someone to come up with a concise argument that would
allow me to
let this go other than "nope, it's not the same". Otherwise, I
feel that I
need to bring up a vot
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
...I'd like someone to come up with a concise argument that would allow me to
let this go other than "nope, it's not the same". Otherwise, I feel that I
need to bring up a vote to put the issue to bed once an
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> ...I'd like someone to come up with a concise argument that would allow me to
> let this go other than "nope, it's not the same". Otherwise, I feel that I
> need to bring up a vote to put the issue to bed once and for all
The only thi
18 matches
Mail list logo
