On 9/5/05, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > David Crossley wrote:
> >
> > > I suggest that we go further and make it a requirement
> > > of graduation from the Incubator that the project
> > > already has some people helping at infra@
> >
> > That can only appl
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 10:30:20AM +1000, David Crossley wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > David Crossley wrote:
> >
> > > I suggest that we go further and make it a requirement
> > > of graduation from the Incubator that the project
> > > already has some people helping at infra@
> >
> > That
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
>
> > I suggest that we go further and make it a requirement
> > of graduation from the Incubator that the project
> > already has some people helping at infra@
>
> That can only apply if there are ASF Members willing to do it, because we
> don't giv
David Crossley wrote:
> I suggest that we go further and make it a requirement
> of graduation from the Incubator that the project
> already has some people helping at infra@
That can only apply if there are ASF Members willing to do it, because we
don't give apmail or root access to non-Members.
On Saturday 03 September 2005 02:56, Leo Simons wrote:
> What *is* your intention? Are you helping us out here? How?
In 2003, I was signing up for the infra@ list, on the basis of "I think I
should really try to help out there, since it is what makes ASF tick."
The message was essentially, hang a
Niclas,
On 02-09-2005 17:25, "Niclas Hedhman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I honestly don't feel like "fueling" this thread, so please don't hesitate to
> say I am outright stupid and don't know what I am talking about, and I'll
> shut up as a good citizen... My intention is not to "whine".
In th
--On September 2, 2005 7:24:54 PM +0200 Erik Abele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Yes, infra could say 'no' more often or could simply shut down the
services they don't want to administer. To be honest, I'd be fine with
this (and its consequences (people/projects leaving, flamewars,
what-have-you)
On 02.09.2005, at 17:25, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Friday 02 September 2005 20:23, Erik Abele wrote:
I honestly don't feel like "fueling" this thread, so please don't
hesitate to
say I am outright stupid and don't know what I am talking about,
and I'll
shut up as a good citizen... My intent
On Friday 02 September 2005 20:23, Erik Abele wrote:
I honestly don't feel like "fueling" this thread, so please don't hesitate to
say I am outright stupid and don't know what I am talking about, and I'll
shut up as a good citizen... My intention is not to "whine".
> Why isn't that working for
I understand compeltely. that's how i got (earned?) my wings. Let's
make this explicit about what we are looking for from a newbie :)
+1 to opening up repo.
thanks,
dims
On 9/2/05, Erik Abele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 02.09.2005, at 14:45, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
> > Sal and Ian from HP
On 02.09.2005, at 14:45, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Sal and Ian from HP expressed interest on [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=webservices-
general&m=111901932102075&w=2
Quoting: "What are the steps for me to get set up w/ admin
rights for SVN? Once I get set up, I'll read up o
Sal and Ian from HP expressed interest on [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=webservices-general&m=111901932102075&w=2
I gave them the pointers:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=webservices-general&m=111901966108282&w=2
They started a thread in infra@ mailing list:
<[EMAIL PROTECTE
On 02.09.2005, at 14:07, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Leo,
Specifically 2 people asked read persmissions on the files. they were
told that's not possible. Am NOT talking about root privs.
Which files? Why? Who?
Cheers,
Erik
-- dims
On 9/2/05, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 02-09-20
On 02.09.2005, at 13:03, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Friday 02 September 2005 17:42, Leo Simons wrote:
By all means, please help make it happen! Step 1 is subscribing to
infrastructure _at_ apache _dot_ org, if you haven't already.
After almost 2 years of trying to find angles of helping out,
Leo,
Specifically 2 people asked read persmissions on the files. they were
told that's not possible. Am NOT talking about root privs.
-- dims
On 9/2/05, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 02-09-2005 04:28, "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Several people on WS-PMC offered
On Friday 02 September 2005 17:42, Leo Simons wrote:
> By all means, please help make it happen! Step 1 is subscribing to
> infrastructure _at_ apache _dot_ org, if you haven't already.
After almost 2 years of trying to find angles of helping out, I finally gave
up and unsubscribed a few weeks ba
On 02-09-2005 10:55, "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leo's been behind a lot of design plans for that, and there's a CA
> tool looming on the horizon. An improvement here would be for someone
> (Leo?) to give us a better overall plan of what's requested and where
> it fits.
(...)
> But
On 02-09-2005 08:27, "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 14:19 +0800, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>> Now, I have suggested before, and still do, that infra starts/becomes a
>> standard ASF project, source code, site, jira, wiki, dev mailing list and all
>> the normal
On 02-09-2005 04:28, "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Several people on WS-PMC offered to help infra. They were turned down
> as they are not members.
NACK. There are lots of ways to help. I remember writing several e-mails
detailing how. There are several non-members actively helpi
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > > Several people on WS-PMC offered to help infra. They were turned down
> > > as they are not members.
> >
> > This has been my impression as well.
> >
> > infra@ is begging for help, but seems to have problem with;
> >
On 9/2/05, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 02 September 2005 10:28, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > Several people on WS-PMC offered to help infra. They were turned down
> > as they are not members.
>
> This has been my impression as well.
>
> infra@ is begging for help, but see
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 14:19 +0800, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>
> Now, I have suggested before, and still do, that infra starts/becomes a
> standard ASF project, source code, site, jira, wiki, dev mailing list and all
> the normal setup, including ordinary committers and contributors. Infra
> places
On Friday 02 September 2005 10:28, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Several people on WS-PMC offered to help infra. They were turned down
> as they are not members.
This has been my impression as well.
infra@ is begging for help, but seems to have problem with;
a. only members allowed in for the stuff
i know :( it's disappointing too.
-- dims
On 9/1/05, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> >
> > Several people on WS-PMC offered to help infra. They were turned down
> > as they are not members.
>
> I find that surprising. We are actively encouraging
> *committer
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
> Several people on WS-PMC offered to help infra. They were turned down
> as they are not members.
I find that surprising. We are actively encouraging
*committers* to be involved.
http://www.apache.org/dev/infra-volunteer.html
There is plenty that they can do. I am not
David,
Several people on WS-PMC offered to help infra. They were turned down
as they are not members.
-- dims
On 9/1/05, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leo Simons wrote:
> >
> > Finally, new project communities need to "get" more than they seem to do
> > now on average, that our inf
Leo Simons wrote:
>
> Finally, new project communities need to "get" more than they seem to do
> now on average, that our infrastructure is run by volunteers and that
> basically they should do a "fair share" of the infrastructural work. In
> other words, we want (nay need!) some of the new people
27 matches
Mail list logo
