> -Original Message-
> From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:21 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Krishna Sankar; Sandeep Kumar
> Subject: Re: Revised OpenSAML proposal
>
>
> CC'ing Sandeep and Krishna - the co-leads f
> > "A" license? What does this mean, that Apache has a license but all
> > users of it need to ask for one too? %-|
>
> i think you'd need to ask an IPR lawyer this.
The RSA position up to this point is that vendors of toolkits not only need to get a
license, but also notify their customers t
Does any one have contacts at RSA? I sent an email to Robert (see
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200204/msg00110.html), but he is
out-of-office till moday. Found him via the IPR section @
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/security/
Thanks,
dims
--- robert burrell donkin
On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 07:08 PM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
we've see numerous cases recently about companies sitting on IPR and
then suddenly demanding money as soon as the technology has been widely
adopted.
these murky waters are muddied even furt
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 10:18 PM, RL 'Bob' Morgan wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Blockers?
---
"Are there IPR-related concerns with SAML (patents held by RSA but
offered royalty free)?"
Can you please elaborate more o
On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 10:18 PM, RL 'Bob' Morgan wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Blockers?
---
"Are there IPR-related concerns with SAML (patents held by RSA but
offered royalty free)?"
Can you please elaborate more on this?
You never know, but t
CC'ing Sandeep and Krishna - the co-leads for JSR 155.
Thanks,
dims
--- Scott Cantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A revised proposal with the references to WS-Sec removed by general consent of the
>parties
> involved.
>
> --- Scott
>
> ---
>
> Proposal for OpenSAML, A Web Services Subprojec
RL 'Bob' Morgan wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Synergy
-
I cannot fail to remember that we have another possible candidate in
line (Wyona) that uses saml already and has his implementation in Java.
I have already asked them about spinning off some of their code
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Synergy
> -
>
> I cannot fail to remember that we have another possible candidate in
> line (Wyona) that uses saml already and has his implementation in Java.
> I have already asked them about spinning off some of their code to other
> proj
> Points to watch
>
> One active committer is not much... this will be our main point to
> watch, and see that it gains momentum.
As the committer in question, I more than agree. My focus is and will be for a while
on Shibboleth, so our goal has been to get to a
stable state so
Nicola,
WS PMC has not voted on it yet. i privately pinged a few folks who seemed receptive. I
will let
scott and his team answer the rest of the queries/concerns. As soon as we setup our
mailing lists
and archives etc (this weekend), i can initiate a vote.
Thanks,
dims
--- Nicola Ken Barozzi
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Incubator Folks,
We have a proposal, an initial code base, identified committers, a willing web services
pmcWhat's the next step? Please advise.
We are walking on new ground here, so I'll step up to reply, but please
take this as my personal opinions except on thos
12 matches
Mail list logo
